The Effect of Sleeping Environment and Sleeping Location Change on Positive Airway Pressure Adherence.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Poor adherence undermines the effectiveness of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for sleep apnea. Disparities exist in PAP adherence by race/ethnicity and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES), but the etiology of these differences is poorly understood. We investigated whether home environmental factors contribute to PAP adherence and whether identified factors explain disparities in adherence by SES. METHODS: Adult patients with sleep apnea were surveyed at clinic visits about their sleep environment. Medical records were abstracted for demographic data, sleep apnea severity, comorbidities, and objective PAP adherence. We evaluated the association between aspects of home sleep environment with PAP adherence using multivariate linear and logistic regression, and assessed effect modification by SES factors. RESULTS: Participants (n = 119) were diverse, with 44% nonwhite and 35% uninsured/Medicaid. After adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, neighborhood SES, education, and marital status, participants who endorsed changing sleeping location once per month or more (18%, n = 21) had 77% lower odds of meeting PAP adherence criteria (> 4 h/night for 70% of nights) and less PAP use (median -11 d/mo, 95% confidence intervals -15.3, -6.5). Frequency of sleeping location change was the only environmental factor surveyed associated with PAP adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent change in sleeping location is associated with reduced PAP adherence, independent of sociodemographic factors. This novel finding has implications for physician-patient dialogue. PAP portability considerations in device selection and design may modify adherence and potentially improve treatment outcomes. Prospective investigation is needed to confirm this finding and inform design of possible interventions.

Analysis of energy utilization and body composition in kidney, bladder, and adrenal cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate resting energy expenditure (REE) and body composition and the relationship between substrate utilization and energy expenditure in urologic cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Measured resting energy expenditure (mREE) was detected by indirect calorimetry in 122 urologic cancer patients and 131 control subjects. Extracellular fluid (ECF), intracellular fluid (ICF), and total water (TW) were measured by bioelectrical impedance appliance. Fat oxidation rate (F-O), carbohydrate oxidation rate, fat mass (FM), and fat free mass (FFM) were further determined. RESULTS: Compared with the controls, cancer patients showed significantly elevated mREE and mREE/FFM (P = 0.049; P < 0.001). Of all the cancer patients, 50% (n = 61) were hypermetabolic, 43.4% (n = 53) normometabolic, and 6.6% (n = 8) hypometabolic, whereas 35.1% (n = 46) of the controls were hypermetabolic, 56.5% (n = 74) normometabolic, and 8.4% (n = 11) hypometabolic. REE was correlated to substrate oxidation rate (R(2) = 0.710). Cancer patients exhibited no significant difference in FM, FM/body weight (BW) and FFM, compared with controls. Cancer patients presented no significant difference in TW compared with controls (P = 0.791), but they had increased ECF (P < 0.001) and decreased ICF (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Aberrations in substrate utilization may contribute to the elevated energy expenditure in urologic cancer patients. Cancer type and pathologic stage are influential factors of REE.