Primary Outcomes for Adults Receiving the Unified Protocol after Hurricane Harvey in an Integrated Healthcare Setting.

The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) has demonstrated efficacy for treating anxiety and depression. However, there are limited effectiveness data when conducted in real-world settings with diverse populations, including those with trauma. We evaluated treatment outcomes in a naturalistic, community setting among 279 adults who received UP following Hurricane Harvey. We examined change in overall clinical severity, depression and anxiety symptoms, functional impairment, and baseline outcome predictors (i.e., demographic characteristics, impact from Hurricane Harvey, co-occurrence of depression and anxiety symptoms). Global clinical severity, depression and anxiety symptoms, and functional impairment decreased by end-of-treatment. Participants experienced global symptom improvement to a lesser degree than demonstrated in efficacy trials. Participants who experienced greater storm impact reported larger reductions in anxiety symptoms than those less impacted by Harvey. Further studies evaluating the effectiveness of the UP post-disaster and with diverse samples are needed.

Serious negative consequences associated with exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A survey of therapist attitudes and experiences.

OBJECTIVE: Many therapists are reluctant to conduct exposure and response prevention (ERP) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Negative beliefs about the safety and tolerability of ERP are common, especially for harm-related OCD symptoms. The study examined the nature and frequency of ERP-related serious negative consequences (SNC) and therapist attitudes and experiences providing ERP for harm-related OCD. METHODS: An anonymous survey was completed by 277 therapists with experience treating OCD using ERP. Questions assessed clinical experiences of harm-related exposures, the nature of SNC, and concerns and clinical considerations regarding ERP. RESULTS: Therapist's willingness to treat harm-related OCD was high. SNCs were reported for 6 clients (per-client risk: adults 0.05%, youth 0.01%) and 13 therapists (per therapist risk 4.73%, therapist per-year risk 0.004%). Qualitative analysis identified themes relating to the conduct of treatment, specific exposure types, professional issues, and negative perceptions of ERP. CONCLUSION: SNC associated with ERP for OCD are rare and primarily represent unintended secondary consequences of OCD or misunderstandings regarding the process and rationale behind ERP. Improving access to ERP will require good communication with clients, families, and other professionals regarding the rationale and safety of ERP.