Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids: United States, 2022: What dentists need to know.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published the Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain-United States, 2022 (CDCCPG) to replace the 2016 guideline. This guideline was designed to serve as a clinical tool to improve communication between clinicians and patients and empower them to make informed, person-centered decisions regarding pain management and the prescribing of opioids. It is intended for primary care and other clinicians, including dentists, who provide pain management for adults with acute, subacute, and chronic pain. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: This article summarizes the CDCCPG, with an emphasis on information of relevance to dentistry. RESULTS: For dentists, the most important recommendations for pain management are that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications are first-line medications for acute dental pain, interdisciplinary care for chronic orofacial pain is indicated, and opioids should only be prescribed for acute dental pain for a maximum of 3 days after risk assessment. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The CDCCPG contains a great deal of relevant information that can help dentists and dental specialists make safe, effective, and evidence-based decisions in providing pain control for their patients.

Burnout in oral medicine and orofacial pain residents.

BACKGROUND: The authors sought to identify the prevalence of burnout in oral medicine (OM) and orofacial pain (OFP) residents and investigate potential contributing factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted. An anonymous 22-item online survey was emailed to the residents of all Commission on Dental Accreditation-accredited OM and OFP residency programs in the United States. Abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory was included to gauge the following details of burnout: emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP), and personal accomplishment. Questions also addressed the impact of residency program characteristics, work-life balance, and possible discrimination or abuse on burnout. RESULTS: Six OM and 12 OFP programs (72 residents) were contacted, and 46 residents responded (response rate, 64%). Overall prevalence of burnout was 35% (29% in OM residents, 40% in OFP residents). High EE burnout was noted in 57% of residents, high DP burnout in 11% of residents, and high personal accomplishment burnout in 59% of residents. Working for fewer than 40 hours per week was significantly associated with low DP burnout (P < .05). Moderate to high DP burnout was more prevalent in men and unmarried residents (whether in a relationship or not) were more likely to experience moderate to high EE burnout (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Burnout among OM and OFP residents is an emerging concern due to its detrimental effect on the physical and mental well-being of the residents. To the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to report burnout prevalence in the 2 most recent dental specialties recognized by the American Dental Association in 2020. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Early detection of signs of burnout among residents would allow program faculty and administrators to provide required support and resources.

Pathology Mimicking Orofacial Pain.

A case of a 64-year-old woman is reported, who developed new-onset pain over a preexisting area of right mandibular fullness. Clinical examination, MRI, and fine-needle aspiration cytology confirmed the diagnosis of a benign parotid gland tumor-pleomorphic adenoma, which was treated by total parotidectomy with complete removal of the tumor. When evaluating a patient with orofacial pain, oral health care providers should be cognizant of all potential differential diagnoses, especially in the setting of red flags such as persistent or enlarging facial swelling/fullness.

Are There Identifiable Risk Factors Associated With Heterotopic Ossification of the Temporomandibular Joint?

PURPOSE: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is defined as bone where it does not belong and as the abnormal presence of calcifications within soft tissues or joints. The purpose of this study was to answer the following clinical question: Are there identifiable risk factors associated with HO in and around the temporomandibular joint (TMJ)? METHODS: We designed a retrospective review of patients seen at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, between January 1985 and December 2019 and diagnosed with HO involving the TMJ. Variables studied included demographic factors, medical history including hereditary conditions, and specific TMJ history including past interventions. The primary outcome variable was the diagnosis of HO based on radiographic findings using the classification system described by Turlington and Durr. Inclusion criterion was clinical or radiographic evidence of TMJ HO. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 48 females and 19 males (2.5:1) with an average age of 44.1 ± 16.7 years (range, 5-76 years). Risk factors associated with TMJ HO included musculoskeletal disease, psychiatric illness, history of trauma or previous TMJ surgeries, and congenital conditions. Of these, a history of nonsurgical TMJ therapy (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; P < .00) was most closely associated with HO. This was followed by male sex (OR, 3.1; P = .001), other craniofacial or musculoskeletal surgeries (OR, 2.4; P = .004), TMJ surgeries (OR, 1.9; P = .012), and neurogenic injury (OR, 1.8; P = .018). The results also demonstrated that patients diagnosed with TMJ HO were medically complex, with 86.6% presenting with other systemic conditions. CONCLUSION: This study identifies several risk factors which differ from those reported in the orthopedic literature. The Turlington and Durr classification is only partially helpful in clinical decision-making and needs to include HO associated with TMJ alloplasts and autogenous bone grafts (eg, costochondral grafts).

The utility of telemedicine in orofacial pain: Guidelines for examination and a retrospective review at a hospital-based practice.

BACKGROUND: Following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has become rapidly implemented into both medical and dental practices. While guidelines for examination through telemedicine have been described in similar fields of oral medicine and neurology, the framework for a comprehensive telemedicine examination for a patient with symptoms of orofacial pain has not yet been described. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to introduce the format of a telemedicine examination for a new patient with orofacial pain as well as describe the success and utility of a telemedicine consultation in a hospital-based orofacial pain practice. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all new telemedicine consults from April 2, 2020, to March 29, 2021. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics as well as details of the initial telemedicine consult and in-office follow up. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy new patients were seen. The most common diagnoses were myofascial pain of the masticatory muscles (37%), an articular disc disorder of the TMJ (21%), and TMJ arthralgia (16%), followed by obstructive sleep apnea (9%) and neuropathic orofacial pain (6%). 146 patients returned to the clinic for an in-office follow up, 78.8% of which had an accurate telemedicine diagnosis. Difficulty discerning between masticatory myofascial pain and TMJ arthralgia was the most common reason for inaccuracy during the telemedicine diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine consultation for patients with orofacial pain can help facilitate an accurate diagnosis and expedite treatment for patients who face challenges presenting for an in-office consultation.

Oromandibular dystonia and temporomandibular disorders.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize clinical features of patients with oromandibular dystonia (OMD) who had temporomandibular disorder (TMD) symptoms. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients seeking treatment at a tertiary-level orofacial pain clinic from January 2015 through December 2020 was undertaken. The inclusionary criteria consisted of a diagnosis of OMD (International Classification of Diseases, Revision 10 code G24.4), which had been confirmed by a neurologist. RESULTS: Eleven patients met the inclusion criteria. Focal dystonia and jaw deviation OMD were the most frequent diagnoses. A dental procedure was a triggering or aggravating factor in 36.4% of patients. All but 2 patients had a sensory trick, or tactile stimulus to a particular body part, and approximately one-half of the patients used an oral appliance as a sensory trick device. All but 1 patient had received a diagnosis of TMD, with myofascial pain of the masticatory muscles being the most prevalent diagnosis. Four patients had received a recommendation for orthodontic treatment. About one-half of the patients had undergone 1 or more invasive dental or maxillofacial surgical interventions to address their dystonia. Anxiety was the most common psychological comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Because patients with OMD commonly experience TMD symptoms, they can receive a misdiagnosis of TMD while the OMD is overlooked. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Owing to concomitant TMD symptoms, patients most often seek dental consultations and undergo treatments such as orthodontic interventions and temporomandibular joint surgeries. A dentist's competency in recognizing these patients can prevent unnecessary procedures and facilitate appropriate patient care.

First Bite Syndrome - An Underrecognized and Underdiagnosed Pain Complication After Temporomandibular Joint Surgery.

PURPOSE: First bite syndrome (FBS) can develop after head and neck surgical procedures. The aim of this study is to identify patients diagnosed with FSB after temporomandibular joint (TMJ) surgery, including their pain characteristics and risk factors for FBS. METHODS: Using a retrospective study design, a cohort of 24 patients with confirmed diagnosis of FBS were identified from the oral and maxillofacial surgery and orofacial pain (OFP) practices at Massachusetts General Hospital and Research Patient Data Registry (RPDR) between 1975 and 2019. The inclusion criteria were facial pain that was triggered by taste stimulus only and followed by a refractory period until the next gustatory stimulus. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients identified, 19 had undergone TMJ surgery, 3 patients had idiopathic FBS, 1 had a parapharyngeal space tumor and 1 developed FBS after facial burns. In the surgical patients, the median duration of onset was 2.75 months post-surgery. Most patients reported pain in the parotid region. Pain was only triggered by a taste stimulus and subsided with subsequent bites of food. 2 patients underwent spontaneous resolution of their symptoms and 1 reported complete resolution with onabotulinum toxin A (BTX) injections. Anxiety and depression were the most common comorbid conditions. CONCLUSION: FBS is an underrecognized pain complication in TMJ surgery patients. A precise history and accurate description of the pain is necessary for correct diagnosis which is important for improved treatment outcomes.

Neuropathic orofacial pain: Characterization of different patient groups using the ICOP first edition, in a tertiary level Orofacial Pain Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients with chronic neuropathic orofacial pain in accordance with the International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP first edition) criteria. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of 108 patients was conducted. The most common categories observed were trigeminal neuralgia (TN) (25.9%), burning mouth syndrome (BMS) (11.1%), persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP) (26.9%), and posttraumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain (PTTNP) (26.9%); 9.3% of patients could not be categorized. RESULTS: TN and BMS was more prevalent in the sixth decade, and PIFP and PTTN were more prevalent in the fifth decade. All categories showed female predilection. The pain in TN was predominantly episodic, described as "sharp shooting" and like an "electric shock," unilateral and affecting the V2 division, and with trigger zones in 50% of patients. Pain in BMS was predominantly constant and described as "burning," with the tongue being the most common site. Pain in PIFP and PTTNP was as follows: varied from constant to episodic; described as "burning," "sharp shooting," "throbbing," or "dull aching"; intraoral or extraoral; and mostly involving the V2 or V3 division. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to characterize patients with neuropathic orofacial pain using the new ICOP criteria. PIFP and PTTNP were most commonly misdiagnosed categories. Using diagnostic criteria will increase the understanding of this patient group.

Results of a Team Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in a Patient with Pain.

PURPOSE: As rates of chronic pain and opioid use disorder continue to rise, improved pain education is essential. Using an interprofessional team objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) simulation, this study evaluates whether prior exposure to a case-based learning module improves students' assessment and treatment planning of a standardized patient prescribed chronic opioids presenting with acute pain. METHODS: A quasi-experimental mixed method approach using convenience sampling was employed to evaluate student performance and the impact of the educational intervention. RESULTS: Fourteen (intervention) and 16 (control) nurse practitioner, physician assistant, medical, pharmacy, and dental students in the final pre-licensure program years completed the team OSCE. Demographics, OSCE learning scores, Interprofessional Attitudes Scale scores, and pain management plans did not differ between groups. All students evaluated the activity highly. Qualitative analysis did not demonstrate differences between groups, but did identify similar themes: students missed opportunities to establish patient-provider rapport and educate across disciplines; opioid use disorder was assumed with chronic opioid therapy; team discussions improved treatment plans; moderators variably influenced team discussion. CONCLUSIONS: This novel approach to interprofessional training in pain management using a team OSCE is promising, with modifications suggested. A case-based learning module without structured education prior to the OSCE did not improve students' assessment and pain management skills compared to a control group. Nonetheless, important themes emerged including biases towards the standardized patient. Additional research is needed to develop effective curricular initiatives to foster and improve interprofessional collaboration in assessing and managing a standardized patient with acute and chronic pain.

Pain Management for Dental Medicine in 2021: Opioids, Coronavirus and Beyond.

Over the past year our attention has inevitably been on the coronavirus pandemic, the health and welfare of our families, patients, and office staffs as well as the re-opening of our dental practices. In addition, the opioid crisis continues, is very likely to worsen as a result of the pandemic and continues to be a challenge to Dentistry. National public health issues and healthcare disparities continue and have created a global concern for providing evidence-based, adequate pain management in the dental setting. We have brought together a group of national thought leaders and experts in this field who will share their insights on the current state of opioid prescribing in Dentistry and describe some of the exciting work being done in advancing pain management. The learning objectives for this conference proceedings were: Describing the implications of current public health concerns for safe and effective pain management in dental medicine.Identifying risk factors and understanding the current guidelines for the use of opioid and non-opioid medications in dental medicine.Analyzing the interprofessional collaborations necessary for effective pain management in dental medicine.Recognizing the challenges and opportunities brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic for the dental profession.Applying evidence-based strategies for managing the complex pain patient in the dental setting.Appraising new and future modalities for the assessment and management of orofacial pain.