Presence of flavoured electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) products in US ENDS advertisements, 2015-2020: a content analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) products come in a variety of flavours (eg, fruit, dessert, menthol). Tobacco advertising has historically used flavours as an advertising tactic, but little is known about flavour type and prevalence in ENDS advertisements. We assess the presence of flavoured ENDS in ads over time, by media outlet (eg, magazines, online) and brand. METHODS: We acquired ENDS ads (N=4546) that first ran between 2015-2017 (n=1685; study 1) and 2018-2020 (n=2861; study 2) in outlets including opt-in emails, direct-to-consumer mail (study 1 only), video (TV and online), radio (study 2 only), static online/mobile (ie, ads without video or moving graphics), social media, outdoor (eg, billboards; study 2 only) and consumer magazines. We coded for presence of flavoured ENDS products and flavour type (eg, fruit, tobacco, menthol) and merged this information with metadata on ad year, outlet and manufacturer/retailer brand. RESULTS: Overall, nearly half (45.5%; n=2067) of ads in our sample featured a flavoured product. Tobacco (59.1%; n=1221), menthol (42.9%; n=887) and fruit (38.6%; n=797) were the most advertised flavours. Over time, the proportion of ads containing tobacco-flavoured and menthol-flavoured ENDS generally decreased before menthol rebounded in 2020. The proportion of ads containing fruit, mint and dessert flavours generally increased over time, with a substantive drop in 2020. We found notable differences in flavoured ENDS advertising by outlet and brand. CONCLUSIONS: The overall presence of flavoured ENDS in our sample of ads remained relatively consistent, with tobacco flavour decreasing over time and some non-tobacco flavours increasing over time until 2020 when the presence decreased.

Nicotine-related content in English language ENDS advertisements in the US: 2018-2020.

There is no standard way to communicate to consumers how much nicotine is present in electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). This study assessed the inclusion of nicotine-related content, including nicotine strength, in a sample of English language ENDS advertisements that appeared in consumer and business-to-business outlets in the US during 2018-2020. The sample, provided by a media surveillance company, included ads from television, radio, newspapers, magazines (consumer and business-to-business), online platforms, outdoor/billboards, and direct-to-consumer emails. We coded for the presence of nicotine-related content (excluding FDA-required warnings) including nicotine strength presentation, such as mg, mg/ml and percent. The sample included 2966 unique ads, of which 33% (n = 979) featured nicotine-related content. The proportion of ads in the entire sample with nicotine-related content differed by manufacturer/retailer. Ads for Logic e-cigarettes had the highest proportion of nicotine content (62%, n = 258), while ads for JUUL and Vapor4Life had the lowest proportion (13.0% (n = 95) and 19.8% (n = 65), respectively). The proportion of ads with nicotine-related content also differed by media outlet: B2B magazines: 64.8% (n = 68); emails: 41% (n = 529); consumer magazines: 30.4% (n = 41); online: 25.3% (n = 227); television: 20% (n = 6); radio: 19.1% (n = 89); and outdoor (0%, n = 0). Across the sample of ads, 15% reported nicotine strength in mg or mg/ml (n = 444), and 9% reported nicotine strength in percent (n = 260). Most ENDS ads do not include nicotine-related content. There is substantial variation in presentation of nicotine strength, which may present challenges for consumer understanding of absolute and relative nicotine-related content.