Development of a transparent and flexible patient-specific bolus for total scalp irradiation.

A commercially available flat bolus (commercial bolus) would not fully fit the irregular surfaces of the scalp. We developed a transparent and flexible material with good fitting properties, analyzed its physical characteristics, and evaluated the clinical feasibility of the bolus fabricated using a three-dimensional (3D) printer (3D bolus). To evaluate the physical characteristics of the new material, treatment plans with virtual, 3D, and commercial boluses were created for water-equivalent phantoms using a radiation treatment planning system (RTPS). Using a head phantom and the dose volume histogram calculated with RTPS, dose distributions for total scalp irradiation were compared between the three treatment plans. To evaluate the clinical feasibility, the fitness and reproducibility of the 3D bolus were compared with the head phantom and clinical cases using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) measurements. A good agreement was observed between the percentage depth dose (PDD) curves for the virtual, 3D, and commercial boluses. The homogeneity indexes of the planning target volume (PTV) for the 3D and commercial boluses were 0.083 and 0.153, respectively, proving that the former achieved a better dose uniformity of PTV than the latter. Good fitness and reproducibility with the 3D bolus were observed in both the head phantom and two clinical cases, with mean DSC values of 0.854, 0.829, and 0.843, respectively. These results successfully demonstrated and verified the utility of the 3D bolus for total scalp irradiation.

Wedged field using the half-field method with a flattening filter-free photon beam.

In this study, we propose a novel wedged field using a half-field flattening filter-free beam without a metallic filter or a moving jaw, and investigate the characteristics of the proposed technique. Dose distributions of the proposed method were first determined in virtual-water or anthropomorphic phantom using a radiotherapy planning system. We evaluated the wedge angle as a function of the field size, collimator rotation, and depth. The wedge angle at 10 MV was observed to be greater than that at 6 MV. The minimum angles at 6 and 10 MV were 17.7° and 40.4°, respectively, while the maximum angles were 33.9° and 48.4°, respectively. We determined that the wedge angle depended on the nominal beam energy and field size, and we verified that the proposed method is capable of delivering a gradient dose distribution and reducing treatment time.

Comparison of the effects of high-energy photon beam irradiation (10 and 18 MV) on 2 types of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy for cancer may be required for patients with implantable cardiac devices. However, the influence of secondary neutrons or scattered irradiation from high-energy photons (≥10 MV) on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is unclear. This study was performed to examine this issue in 2 ICD models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: ICDs were positioned around a water phantom under conditions simulating clinical radiation therapy. The ICDs were not irradiated directly. A control ICD was positioned 140 cm from the irradiation isocenter. Fractional irradiation was performed with 18-MV and 10-MV photon beams to give cumulative in-field doses of 600 Gy and 1600 Gy, respectively. Errors were checked after each fraction. Soft errors were defined as severe (change to safety back-up mode), moderate (memory interference, no changes in device parameters), and minor (slight memory change, undetectable by computer). RESULTS: Hard errors were not observed. For the older ICD model, the incidences of severe, moderate, and minor soft errors at 18 MV were 0.75, 0.5, and 0.83/50 Gy at the isocenter. The corresponding data for 10 MV were 0.094, 0.063, and 0 /50 Gy. For the newer ICD model at 18 MV, these data were 0.083, 2.3, and 5.8 /50 Gy. Moderate and minor errors occurred at 18 MV in control ICDs placed 140 cm from the isocenter. The error incidences were 0, 1, and 0 /600 Gy at the isocenter for the newer model, and 0, 1, and 6 /600Gy for the older model. At 10 MV, no errors occurred in control ICDs. CONCLUSIONS: ICD errors occurred more frequently at 18 MV irradiation, which suggests that the errors were mainly caused by secondary neutrons. Soft errors of ICDs were observed with high energy photon beams, but most were not critical in the newer model. These errors may occur even when the device is far from the irradiation field.