Perceived exertion and dyspnea while cycling during a hypoxic and hyperoxic placebo.

Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is used to subjectively quantify the perception of physical activity, breathlessness or dyspnea, and leg discomfort (RPElegs) during exercise. However, it is unknown how dyspnea or RPElegs can be influenced by expectations. Thirty healthy, active participants (19 males, 11 females) completed five, 5-minute submaximal cycling trials at 60% peak work rate. We deceived participants by telling them they were inspiring different hypoxic and hyperoxic gases, when in fact they breathed room air. Cardiorespiratory variables were similar between the trials, however, dyspnea and RPElegs evaluated with a Borg scale changed in a dose-response manner. When participants believed they were breathing 15% O2, they significantly increased dyspnea +0.70 ± 0.2 units (p = 0.03) compared to room air, whereas RPElegs was unchanged +0.35 ± 0.1 units (p = 0.70). When participants believed they were breathing 15% O2, they significantly increased dyspnea +1.05 ± 0.4 units (p = 0.003) compared to 23% hyperoxic condition, whereas RPElegs was unchanged +0.35 ± 0.1 units (p = 0.70). We found that dyspnea during exercise is susceptible to expectancy, without any accompanying physiological changes. Given coaches and clinicians use perceived exertion to prescribe exercise intensity and evaluate treatments, our findings show that the effect of expectations must be considered when interpreting sensations of breathlessness.

Partitioning the work of breathing during running and cycling using optoelectronic plethysmography.

Work of breathing ([Formula: see text]) derived from a single lung volume and pleural pressure is limited and does not fully characterize the mechanical work done by the respiratory musculature. It has long been known that abdominal activation increases with increasing exercise intensity, yet the mechanical work done by these muscles is not reflected in [Formula: see text]. Using optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP), we sought to show first that the volumes obtained from OEP (VCW) were comparable to volumes obtained from flow integration (Vt) during cycling and running, and second, to show that partitioned volume from OEP could be utilized to quantify the mechanical work done by the rib cage ([Formula: see text]RC) and abdomen ([Formula: see text]AB) during exercise. We fit 11 subjects (6 males/5 females) with reflective markers and balloon catheters. Subjects completed an incremental ramp cycling test to exhaustion and a series of submaximal running trials. We found good agreement between VCW versus Vt during cycling (bias = 0.002; P > 0.05) and running (bias = 0.016; P > 0.05). From rest to maximal exercise,[Formula: see text]AB increased by 84% (range: 30%-99%; [Formula: see text]AB: 1 ± 1 J/min to 61 ± 52 J/min). The relative contribution of the abdomen increased from 17 ± 9% at rest to 26 ± 16% during maximal exercise. Our study highlights and provides a quantitative measure of the role of the abdominal muscles during exercise. Incorporating the work done by the abdomen allows for a greater understanding of the mechanical tasks required by the respiratory muscles and could provide further insight into how the respiratory system functions during disease and injury.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrated that optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) is a reliable tool to determine ventilatory volume changes during cycling and running, without restricting natural upper arm movements. Second, using OEP volumes coupled with pressure-derived measures, we calculated the work done by the rib cage and abdomen, respectively, during exercise. Collectively, our findings indicate that pulmonary mechanics can be accurately quantified using OEP, and abdominal work performed during ventilation contributes substantially to the overall work of the respiratory musculature.