RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Varicocele embolization is an effective, minimally invasive treatment option, with a symptom improvement rate of around 90%. However, anatomical variations and post-embolization recurrences pose challenges to its efficacy. This article discusses the antegrade embolization technique as a viable alternative for cases in which retrograde embolization fails, offering a broader spectrum of treatment options for varicocele. CASE PRESENTATION: This case report details the treatment of a 27-year-old male with a left varicocele, diagnosed during infertility assessment, using an alternative embolization technique. Despite initial failed attempts at retrograde catheterization via the femoral vein, a direct inguinal puncture of the left testicular vein was successfully performed under ultrasound guidance. A mixture of Glubran® and Lipiodol® was used for embolization, achieving varicocele embolization without complications. The patient was discharged 2 hours post-procedure, with follow-up confirming the procedure's effectiveness and safety. CONCLUSION: This article introduces a less invasive, ultrasound-guided technique for varicocele embolization, presenting a viable alternative to surgery when conventional retrograde methods fail.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To identify clinical, radiological, and angiographic characteristics associated with recurrent hemoptysis after bronchial artery embolization (BAE) in patients with lung cancer and severe hemoptysis admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 144 consecutive patients with lung cancer who underwent BAE for life-threatening hemoptysis admitted in the ICU between 2014 and 2022 were retrospectively included. Demographics, laboratory values, clinical course, and radiological/angiographic features were compared between those with and without recurrent hemoptysis within 1 month after embolization. RESULTS: Of the 144 patients (mean age, 60.2 years [SD ± 10.9]; females, 15.3%), 34.7% (50/144) experienced clinically relevant recurrent hemoptysis within 1 month; among them, 29 of 50 (58.0%) cases necessitated a second embolization. Massive hemoptysis was observed in 54.2%, with 16.7% receiving the vasopressin analog terlipressin. The mean volume of hemoptysis and simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II) were 235 mL (SD ± 214.3) and 31.2 (SD ± 18.6), respectively. Computed tomography (CT) angiography revealed pulmonary artery (PA) injury (11.5%) and necrosis/cavitation (25.8%), and PA embolization was performed in 15.3% of cases. Technical success rate was 92%. SAPS II (P = .01), massive hemoptysis (P < .001), terlipressin use (P = .01), necrosis/cavitation (P = .01), and PA injury on CT angiography (P < .001) were associated with recurrent hemoptysis. Independent predictors on multivariate analysis were massive hemoptysis (P = .016) and PA injury on CT angiography (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with lung cancer and life-threatening hemoptysis treated by BAE, massive hemoptysis and PA injury identified on CT angiography are independent predictors of recurrent hemoptysis.
