Clinical utility of portable electrophysiology to measure fatigue in treatment-naïve non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) biology remains poorly understood. Responsible mechanisms may be central or peripheral and originate anywhere from the brain to muscle fiber. Objective measurement is complex and previously limited to specialized laboratories. Portable electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) may enhance objective measurement. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of portable EMG-EEG in CRF assessment. METHODS: A prospective observational feasibility study compared ten outpatients with inoperable, treatment-naïve non-small cell lung cancer and CRF to ten healthy volunteers. All completed a sustained isometric hand-grip contraction at 30% maximal level until self-perceived exhaustion. 128-channel EEG and 2-channel EMG signals of forearm muscles were recorded. Device acceptability was evaluated by questionnaire. RESULTS: The task was evaluated in two stages; first and last 20 s. CRF cohort perceived exhaustion earlier than volunteers (mean 137 ± 76 s vs 208 ± 51 s). As fatigue progressed, EMG amplitude increased significantly (CRF p = 0.02; volunteers: p = 0.04) in both groups as did EMG beta band power (CRF p = 0.008; volunteers: p = 0.006). The increase was significantly less in CRF (amplitude p = 0.032; beta power: p = 0.014). EEG beta band power in the contralateral motor cortex increased significantly (CRF p = 0.03; volunteers: p = 0.019) in both cohorts but to greater extent (p = 0.024) in CRF. One hundred percent device acceptability was reported. CONCLUSIONS: A laboratory-based evaluation was successfully adapted to the outpatient setting during routine visits. High acceptability supports clinical utility. In CRF, a higher degree of cortical activation was required to drive a much lower level of muscle performance. This suggests impairment of both central and peripheral mechanisms in CRF.

Low number of examined lymph nodes in node-negative breast cancer patients is an adverse prognostic factor.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to determine whether the number of lymph nodes removed at axillary dissection is associated with recurrence and survival in node-negative breast cancer (NNBC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1606 women with pathologically node-negative T1-T3 invasive breast cancer. Median follow-up was 61 months (range 2-251). Potential prognostic factors assessed included: number of axillary lymph nodes examined, age, menopausal status, tumor size, histological type, tumor grade, estrogen receptor(ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2. RESULTS: At 5 years, relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was 85% and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rate was 94%. In univariate analysis, factors significantly associated with lower RFS and BCSS were: fewer than six lymph nodes examined (RFS, P = 0.01; BCSS, P = 0.007), tumor size >2 cm, grade III, negative ER or PR. Statistically significant factors for lower RFS and BCSS in multivariate analysis were: fewer than six lymph nodes examined [RFS, hazard ratio (HR) 1.36, P = 0.029; BCSS, HR 1.87, P = 0.005], tumor size >2 cm, tumor grade III and negative PR. CONCLUSIONS: Examination of fewer than six lymph nodes is an adverse prognostic factor in NNBC because it could lead to understaging. Six or more nodes need to be examined at axillary dissection to be confident of a node-negative status. This may be useful, in conjunction with other prognostic factors, in the assessment of NNBC patients for adjuvant systemic therapy.

Chemotherapy options for the elderly patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Combination chemotherapy has been shown to improve overall survival compared with best supportive care in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The survival advantage is modest and was initially demonstrated with cisplatin-containing regimens in a large meta-analysis of randomized trials reported in 1995. Newer chemotherapy combinations have been shown to be better tolerated than older cisplatin-based combinations, and some trials have also shown greater efficacy and survival benefits with these newer combinations. Combination chemotherapy is, therefore, the currently accepted standard of care for patients with good performance statuses aged less than 70 years with advanced NSCLC. However, there are limited data from clinical trials to support the use of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients over 70 years of age with advanced NSCLC. Subgroup analyses of large randomized phase III trials suggest that elderly patients with good performance statuses do as well as younger patients treated with combination chemotherapy. There are few randomized trials reported that evaluate chemotherapy in patients aged greater than 70 years only. Based on data from trials performed by an Italian group, single-agent vinorelbine has been shown to have significant activity in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC and to be well tolerated by those patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statuses of two or less, with associated improvements in measures of global health.