Exploring bias in incident investigations: An empirical examination using construction case studies.

INTRODUCTION: Incident investigation is a foundational tool of safety management. Determining the causal factors of any incident underpins organizational learning and subsequent positive change to processes and practices. Research of incident investigation has largely focused on what information to collect, how to analyze it, and how to optimize resultant conclusions and organizational learning. However, much less attention has been paid to the process of information collection, and specifically that of subjective information obtained through interviews. Yet, as all humans are biased and can't help being so, the information collection process is inevitably vulnerable to bias. METHOD: Simulated investigation interviews with 34 experienced investigators were conducted within the construction industry. RESULTS: Common biases were revealed including confirmation bias, anchoring bias, and fundamental attribution error. Analysis was also able to unpack when and how these biases most often emerged in the interview process, and the potential consequences for organizational learning. CONCLUSIONS: Being biased to a certain degree will remain inevitable for any individual, and therefore, efforts to mitigate the effects of biases is necessary. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Increased awareness and insights can support the development of processes and training for investigators to mitigate its effects and thus enhance learning from incidents in the field prevent reoccurrence.

Clinical Impact of a Standardized Risk-Stratified Thromboprophylaxis Protocol for Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical impact of an institutional thromboprophylaxis protocol in patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), who are at increased risk for thromboembolism (TE). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of children less than 18 years between March 2020 and December 2021. Eligible patients were confirmed with MIS-C and were managed with a standardized multidisciplinary treatment approach that included a thromboprophylaxis protocol to guide and unify clinical practice. For high-risk patients, prophylactic dose enoxaparin (target anti-Factor Xa 0.1-0.3 U/mL) was added. In high-risk patients with TE risk factors persistent at hospital discharge, thromboprophylaxis was prescribed for an additional 30 days. RESULTS: Of 135 patients with MIS-C, 124 (92%) required intensive care unit stay and 64 (47%) required a central venous catheter for a median duration of 5 days (IQR, 4-7). Prophylactic dose enoxaparin was initiated in 116 out of 121 patients (96%) deemed high-risk per our protocol at a median of 1 day after admission [IQR, 0-3] achieving target levels at a median of 1 day [IQR, 1-2]. The median initial anti-Factor Xa level was 0.13 u/mL [IQR, 0.05-0.19]. One patient (0.7%) developed symptomatic noncatheter related superficial vein thrombosis requiring therapeutic anticoagulation. Thromboprophylaxis was extended for 30 days after discharge in 108 out of 135 patients (80%). Bleeding events occurred in 5 patients during hospitalization (4.2%). All bleeding events were clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. There were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an institutional standardized thromboprophylaxis protocol in MIS-C was feasible and led to timely initiation of prophylactic anticoagulation and low rates of TEs and bleeding complications.

Is the age of cervical cancer diagnosis changing over time?

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine if there has been an increase in the age of diagnosis of cervical cancer over time, specifically in the proportion of patients over 65 years old, given decreasing rates of hysterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a single institution was conducted including cervical cancer patients seen between 1986 and 2016. Data included demographic variables including age of diagnosis, last cervical cancer screening, and cancer information. Cochran-Armitage test was used to assess temporal trends in the proportion of patients diagnosed over 65. RESULTS: A total of 1,019 patients with cervical cancer were reviewed, of whom 116 were over the age of 65. The age of diagnosis increased by 0.2 years per calendar year, with an average age of diagnosis of 43.7 years old in 1986 versus 49.5 years old in 2016 (p<0.01). The proportion of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer over the age of 65 did not significantly differ over time (17.2 % in 1986 vs. 14.8 % in 2016, p=0.39). 19.0 % of women diagnosed with cervical cancer over the age of 65 developed cancer despite exiting screening appropriately. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, the age of diagnosis of cervical cancer increased over time, however, there was no significant difference in the percentage of women diagnosed over the age of 65.

An Unmet Need in Healthcare Leadership: A Survey of Practicing Physicians' Perspectives on Healthcare Delivery Science Education.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare delivery science education (HDSE) is increasingly needed by physicians balancing clinical care, practice management, and leadership responsibilities in their daily lives. However, most practicing physicians have received little HDSE in undergraduate through residency training. The purpose of this study is to 1) quantify the perception of the need for HDSE and interest in HDSE among a diverse sample of physicians, and 2) determine if perspectives on HDSE vary by specialty, rurality, and years in practice. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional, single state, mailed questionnaire, we surveyed 170 physicians about their perspectives on HDSE and interest in an HDSE program. Descriptive statistics and a multivariable logistic regression are presented. RESULTS: Among the 70.5% of responding eligible physicians, 75% of physicians had less HDSE than they would like and 90% were interested in obtaining more HDSE. Thirty-five percent of physicians were interested in joining the described HDSE program. The most prevalent barriers to obtaining HDSE were a lack of time and existing programs. Physician perspectives were similar across specialties, years in practice, and rurality. CONCLUSION: There is a high unmet need for HDSE among physicians. Diverse and innovative HDSE programming needs to be developed to meet this need. Programming should be developed not only for physicians but also for undergraduate through residency training programs.

Effect of Obesity on Cervical Cancer Screening and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to identify whether obese women are less appropriately screened for cervical cancer before diagnosis and to explore related cancer outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cervical cancer patients at a single institution between 1986 and 2016 and collected demographic information including age, cancer stage, body mass index (BMI), screening information, and cancer outcomes. Morbid obesity was defined as BMI of 40 kg/m or greater, obesity as BMI of 30 to less than 40 kg/m, and nonobese as BMI of less than 30 kg/m. χ, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare variables between BMI categories. Cox regression models were used to evaluate recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 1,080 patients were reviewed, of whom 311 (29.4%) were obese and 107 (10.1%) morbidly obese. A significant association between BMI and cytology screening was evidenced with morbidly obese women having the highest incorrect rate (64.4%), followed by obese (51.5%) and nonobese women (46.0%, p < .01). There was no significant difference in presence of symptoms at presentation (p = .12) or stage (p = .06) between BMI categories. In multivariable analysis of cancer outcomes, higher BMI was associated with worse OS (p < .01) with a hazard ratio of 1.25 (95% CI = 0.92-1.69) for obese women and hazard ratio 2.27 (95% CI = 1.56-3.31) for morbidly obese women relative to normal weight but recurrence-free survival did not differ between BMI groups (p = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Our study strengthens evidence that obese and morbidly obese women have disproportionate inappropriate screening before cervical cancer diagnosis, and morbidly obese women have worse OS than their counterparts.