Patients With and Without Double Crush Syndrome Achieve Similar Rates of Clinical Improvement Following Carpal Tunnel Release.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) in patients with and without double crush syndrome (DCS), defined as concurrent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and cervical radiculopathy at C5-T1 on preoperative nerve conduction studies. METHODS: Patients with preoperative nerve conduction studies who underwent unilateral, isolated CTR were retrospectively identified. All patients completed preoperative and 3-month postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) and pain interference (PI), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires, and responded to the anchor question: "Since your treatment, how would you rate your overall function?" (much worse, worse, slightly worse, no change, slightly improved, improved, much improved). Preoperative, postoperative, and changes in scores for UE, PI, and QuickDASH were compared, as were the anchor question responses and rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). RESULTS: Sixty-three patients with DCS and 115 patients with CTS only were included. At 3- to 4-month follow-up, absolute and change in UE, PI, and QuickDASH scores were not statistically different between patients with DCS and CTS. Rates of anchor question response and MCID achievement were comparable for patients with CTS only and DCS on each questionnaire. The MCID achievement ranged from 48.4% to 68.8% in the unmatched cohort and 48.4% to 60% in the matched group. CONCLUSIONS: At 3 to 4 months, patients with DCS experience similar patient-reported symptomatic and functional improvement, and achieve MCID of outcome measures at comparable rates to patients with CTS only. For patients with nerve compression at the carpal tunnel and cervical spine, CTR is a reasonable first step prior to proceeding with cervical spine decompression.

Clinical Y-view versus 3-dimensional assessments of intramuscular fat in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Recent evidence suggests an inhomogeneous distribution of intramuscular rotator cuff fat infiltration (FI) in a small sample of individuals with rotator cuff tears, yet clinically just a few slices at the scapular Y-view are used to evaluate FI in patients with rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this study was to determine if assessment of FI using the scapular Y-view is representative of the entire muscle in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears, and whether this varies by tear size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 25) diagnosed with full-thickness rotator cuff tear and confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. Fat-water sequences were used to objectively quantify mean FI (%) in the entire 3D muscle and the mean from 3 slices at the Y-view. Mixed-model 2 × 2 ANOVAs were used to assess for differences between methods, and if results vary by tear-size. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between mean amount of FI of the entire 3D muscle and mean Y-view in the supraspinatus or infraspinatus muscles (p > 0.05). Additionally, this did not differ across tear size groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Results of this study suggest FI assessed in the Y-view is not different (mean difference < 1.0%) from FI of the entire 3D muscle in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Therefore, the clinical utility of evaluating rotator cuff intramuscular fat infiltration with the Y-view is further supported in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears across tear sizes.

The Potential Value of Performing Preoperative Urinalysis Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although the practice of checking a urinalysis prior to elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is relatively common, very little has been reported on the association between a preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) and adverse events in primary TKA. The goal of this study is to investigate the risk of postoperative complication following TKA as it relates to preoperative UTI. METHODS: Patients undergoing TKA were queried in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Morbid events were classified as minor (transfusion, pneumonia, wound dehiscence, UTI, and renal insufficiency) and serious (wound infection, thromboembolic event, renal failure, myocardial infarction, prolonged ventilation, unplanned intubation, sepsis, and death). Risk factors for adverse events were analyzed in both univariate and multivariate fashion. RESULTS: A total of 203,851 patients undergoing TKA met inclusion criteria and 507 patients had a UTI present at time of surgery (UTI PATOS). A propensity matched analysis controlling for age, gender, body mass index, operative year, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score identified 507 patients without a UTI PATOS to serve as the control group. Following adjustment for baseline characteristics, operative year, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score, UTI PATOS was associated with increased risk for serious adverse events (odds ratio [OR] 2.746, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.546-4.878, P = .0006), occurrence of any morbid event (OR 1.894, 95% CI 1.299-2.761, P = .0009), and reoperation (OR 4, 95% CI 2.592-6.169, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a UTI present at time of TKA increases the risk of multiple postoperative complications and reoperation.