Intravenous sotalol for the termination of supraventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation and flutter: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Sotalol Multicenter Study Group.

Sotalol is an antiarrhythmic agent with combined beta-blocking and class III antiarrhythmic properties. This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of sotalol in terminating supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), atrial fibrillation (AFib), and atrial flutter (AFl). Ninety-three patients with spontaneous or induced SVT (n = 45) or AF (AFib or AFl; n = 48) with a ventricular rate of > or = 120 beats/min were studied. In the first phase, the double-blind phase, patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or intravenous (i.v.) sotalol, 1.0 or 1.5 mg/kg. If SVT or AF did not convert to sinus rhythm or if the ventricular rate did not slow to < 100 beats/min within 30 minutes, patients then entered the second phase, the open-label phase, which also lasted 30 minutes, and were given 1.5 mg/kg iv sotalol. In the SVT group, during the double-blind phase conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 2 (14%) of 14 of patients who received placebo, 10 (67%) of 15 who received sotalol, 1.0 mg/kg (p < 0.05 vs placebo), and 10 (67%) of 15 who received 1.5 mg/kg sotalol (p < 0.05 vs placebo); during the open-label phase, 1.5 mg/kg i.v. sotalol converted 7 (41%) of 17 of patients. In the AF group, during the double-blind phase conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 2 (14%) of 14 of patients who received placebo, 2 (11%) of 18 who received 1.0 mg/kg sotalol (p not significant [NS] vs placebo), and 2 (13%) of 16 who received 1.5 mg/kg sotalol (p = NS vs placebo); in these groups, a > 20% reduction of ventricular rate without conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 0 (0%) of 14, 13 (72%) of 18 (p < 0.05 vs placebo), and 12 (75%) of 16 of patients (p < 0.05 vs placebo), respectively; during the open-label phase, 1.5 mg/kg i.v. sotalol converted 7 (30%) of 23 of patients. The most common adverse events were hypotension and dyspnea. During the double-blind phase they occurred in 10% of patients who received placebo, 9% of those who received 1.0 mg/kg i.v. sotalol (p = NS vs placebo), and 10% of those who received 1.5 mg/kg i.v. sotalol (p = NS vs placebo). Most of these events were mild to moderate, but all were transient and clinically manageable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Clinical pharmacokinetics of sotalol.

Sotalol is an antiarrhythmic agent with combined class II and III properties. It is nearly completely absorbed after oral administration and undergoes essentially no first-pass hepatic metabolism. As a result, its absolute bioavailability is 90-100%. Peak plasma concentrations are reached 2-4 hours after an oral dose. Administering sotalol with food reduces its bioavailability by approximately 20%. A 2-compartment model adequately describes the decline of sotalol plasma concentrations after intravenous or oral administration. The drug has an apparent volume of distribution of 1.2-2.4 liters/kg. Results of animal studies indicate that sotalol distributes into a number of tissues, including those of the heart, liver, and kidney, but it is hydrophilic and thus penetrates the central nervous system poorly. Sotalol does not bind to plasma proteins. No significant biotransformation of sotalol takes place in humans. Sotalol is primarily eliminated by renal excretion, with approximately 80-90% of a dose being excreted unchanged in the urine; a small amount is excreted unchanged in the feces. In subjects with normal renal function, total body clearance of sotalol averages 150 mL/min and the terminal elimination half-life is 10-20 hours. Long-term administration of sotalol does not alter its kinetics, and plasma concentrations following single or multiple doses are proportional to the dose. Sotalol is a racemic mixture of the d- and l-stereoisomers. d,l-Sotalol is excreted in the urine equally as d- and l-sotalol, and there is no evidence of racemization. The clearance of sotalol is reduced and its elimination half-life is prolonged in patients with renal insufficiency; as a result, dosage adjustment is necessary.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Diltiazem improves resuscitation from experimental ventricular fibrillation in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of diltiazem on survival immediately after cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in dogs. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, randomized trial. SETTING: Laboratory at a large, university-affiliated medical center. SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight mongrel dogs, weighing 12 to 16 kg. INTERVENTIONS: After the administration of anesthesia, catheters were placed in the pulmonary artery, aortic arch, left ventricle, right ventricle, and great cardiac vein (12 dogs) for sample collection, pressure determinations, and induction of ventricular fibrillation. Dogs were randomized to receive either diltiazem, calcium chloride, or placebo (saline) either before or early during CPR. Dogs underwent 3 mins of unassisted fibrillatory arrest followed by 10 mins of standard CPR using a pneumatic device. After 13 mins of ventricular fibrillation, defibrillation was attempted repeatedly for less than or equal to 10 mins. Successful resuscitation was defined as an organized rhythm with an unassisted systolic BP of greater than 60 mm Hg for greater than or equal to 2 mins. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The resuscitation rate was significantly greater in diltiazem-treated animals (100%) than in those dogs receiving calcium (57%) or placebo (29%). Diltiazem-treated animals were resuscitated faster and required fewer defibrillation attempts than did dogs in the other groups. During CPR, coronary artery perfusion pressure and blood gases (arterial, venous, and myocardial) were similar among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Diltiazem improves the resuscitation from experimentally induced ventricular fibrillation when administered before or early during CPR. This response may have important clinical implications in the treatment of patients undergoing cardiac arrest and CPR.

The effect of CPR on plasma diltiazem concentrations in dogs.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of cardiac arrest with CPR on diltiazem concentrations in dogs. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, randomized trial. SETTING: Laboratory at a large university-affiliated medical center. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: Twenty mongrel dogs. INTERVENTIONS: Following administration of anesthesia, catheters were placed in the pulmonary artery, aortic arch, left ventricle, and right ventricle. Dogs were randomized to receive diltiazem (0.5 mg/kg) either 60 minutes before or during cardiac arrest with CPR. After 13 minutes of cardiac arrest, defibrillation was attempted. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Frequent blood samples for diltiazem concentrations were obtained before, during, and after cardiac arrest. The mean diltiazem concentration rose 70% during CPR in the group that received diltiazem before cardiac arrest. The group that received diltiazem during CPR had concentrations five times greater than expected during sinus rhythm. CONCLUSION: Increased diltiazem concentrations are observed during CPR and are probably related to altered distribution encountered during CPR.

Intravenous 3-methoxy-O-desmethyl-encainide in reentrant supraventricular tachycardia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in patients undergoing EP study.

Encainide is an agent effective in atrioventricular and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. The metabolites O-desmethyl encainide and 3-methoxy-O-desmethyl encainide (MODE) are responsible for the clinical effects of encainide in most patients. In this study, intravenous MODE was evaluated in eight patients with reentrant supraventricular tachycardia undergoing electrophysiological testing. After tachycardia was induced at least twice to ensure reproducibility, MODE (30 micrograms/kg/min x 15 min, then 7.5 micrograms/kg/min) or placebo was administered in a double-blind fashion. If tachycardia remained inducible, the infusion was unblinded; in nonresponding subjects who received placebo, MODE was then administered. Placebo was ineffective in 3/3 patients. MODE prevented tachycardia induction in 5/8 patients and increased the tachycardia cycle length from 302 +/- 38 to 413 +/- 67 msec in the other three. At a mean concentration of 774 +/- 229 ng/ml, MODE prolonged PR, AH, HV, QRS, and QT intervals, right ventricular and accessory pathway effective refractory periods, and slowed or blocked antegrade accessory pathway conduction. Changes in intracardiac conduction were rate independent between cycle lengths 400 to 600 msec, while changes in ventricular effective refractory periods were most pronounced at rapid pacing rates. No adverse effects, hemodynamic changes, or conduction disturbances occurred. Thus, MODE can modify or suppress induction of reentrant atrioventricular or atrioventricular nodal tachycardia. The study design used here is well suited for the evaluation of newer antiarrhythmic agents by electrophysiological testing.

Sotalol versus class I and II antiarrhythmic agents.

In two separate, double-blind, multicenter antiarrhythmic studies, sotalol was compared with propranolol or quinidine using placebo for baseline and/or washout periods. The comparison with quinidine was a crossover study. To be enrolled in these studies, patients were required to have a premature ventricular contraction (PVC) rate of at least 30/hr on a baseline 24-hour ambulatory ECG. At doses calculated to produce equivalent degrees of beta blockade, sotalol was more effective than propranolol in reducing the frequency of PVCs, and the two drugs produced similar reductions in ventricular tachycardia (VT) events. The side effects for sotalol and propranolol were mainly due to beta blockade, and the incidence of side effects with the two drugs was similar. Sotalol was comparable with quinidine in reducing PVCs and VT events. The side effects on sotalol were primarily related to beta-adrenergic blockade, while those on quinidine were predominantly gastrointestinal or neurologic in nature.

An evaluation of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and dialyzability of verapamil in chronic hemodialysis patients.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of verapamil were investigated in six chronic hemodialysis patients. A single oral 120-mg dose was administered both on a non-hemodialysis day and a hemodialysis day separated by greater than or equal to 7 days. Blood pressure and PR interval were measured simultaneously with each blood sample. Plasma verapamil and norverapamil concentrations were analyzed by high pressure liquid chromatography. The mean Cmax, tmax, AUC, apparent plasma clearance, and terminal t 1/2 were 190 +/- 108 ng/mL, 0.6 +/- 0.2 hour, 676 +/- 443 ng.hr/mL, 3926 +/- 1933 mL/min, and 11.4 +/- 4.0 hr, respectively, on the nonhemodialysis day. The dialysis clearance of verapamil and norverapamil was negligible. The t 1/2 during hemodialysis was 3.6 +/- 1.1 hr, compared with 3.4 +/- 0.7 hr during the same period of time postdose on the nonhemodialysis day (NS, P greater than .05). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased for up to 4 hours postdose, whereas the PR interval tended to increase. Conclusions include: (1) the single oral-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of verapamil in chronic hemodialysis patients are similar to published data in normal subjects and cardiac patients and (2) verapamil and norverapamil are not significantly removed by hemodialysis, so that supplemental doses are not necessary.

Antifibrillatory effects of high dose bretylium and a lidocaine-bretylium combination during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Previous CPR studies from our laboratory have shown that a standard iv dose of lidocaine (2 mg/kg) has a rapid antifibrillatory effect, while a standard dose of bretylium (5 mg/kg) produces a delayed but more pronounced effect. In order to determine the optimal doses, we investigated the antifibrillatory effects of a) high dose bretylium (10 mg/kg) and b) a combination of lidocaine (2 mg/kg) and bretylium (5 mg/kg) during CPR in two groups of anesthetized dogs. Ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) was determined using a train method and CPR was performed by a pneumatic device. During both a control and drug phase, the VFT was determined in each dog before CPR, and after each of three consecutive 3-min CPR periods. The combination of lidocaine and bretylium (11 dogs) caused a significant increase in VFT compared to the control phase after each of the 3-min CPR periods and maintained this effect for greater than 2 h. Bretylium 10 mg/kg (eight dogs) significantly elevated the VFT only after the third 3-min CPR period. We conclude that the combination of standard doses of lidocaine and bretylium produces a rapid and prolonged antifibrillatory effect and may be the optimal regimen in the CPR setting. High dose bretylium has a delayed onset of effect and appears to produce no greater effect than standard doses of the drug.

Lorcainide for the treatment of refractory ventricular tachycardia: clinical and electrophysiologic results.

The electrophysiologic effects and antiarrhythmic efficacy of lorcainide were evaluated using programmed electrical stimulation (PES) in 14 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to conventional drug therapy. Lorcainide was administered orally (200-400 mg/d, eight patients), intravenously (150 mg/d, one patient), or by both routes (250-380 mg/d, five patients) prior to PES. In 13 patients undergoing both control and lorcainide PES, lorcainide increased the QRS duration (102 +/- 28 to 125 +/- 28 ms, P less than .001) and the QTc interval (430 +/- 39 to 471 +/- 32 ms, P less than .01) but had no effect on the RR interval (786 +/- 156 to 780 +/- 172 ms, P greater than .2). The right ventricular effective refractory period increased from 258 +/- 8 to 285 +/- 22 ms (P less than .001). Lorcainide prevented VT induction or resulted in induction of only well-tolerated, nonsustained VT in six of 14 patients (43%). The cycle length of induced VT increased from 264 +/- 32 to 306 +/- 34 ms (P less than .01). Of six patients started on chronic therapy, four still receive lorcainide after 18 +/- 7 months. Adverse effects have consisted mainly of sleep disturbances. Thus, it can be stated that lorcainide is effective in certain patients with VT refractory to conventional therapy.