Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
ACS Omega ; 7(13): 11293-11304, 2022 Apr 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35415324

RESUMO

According to numerous laboratory experiments and field applications, polymer flooding can effectively modify the liquid absorption profile and increase the sweep efficiency, thereby enhancing the oil recovery. However, long-term injection of polymers decreases the effective permeability of the reservoir and plugs the formation pores, resulting in irreversible reservoir damage. In the development process, polymer types and concentrations must be selected according to the reservoir to avoid problems such as plugging of the formation pores. This study was aimed at clarifying the degree of plugging and the injection limit of the reservoir when a salt-resistant polymer (SRP) is used in production processes of the Daqing Oilfield. To this end, oil displacement experiments, dynamic and static adsorption experiments, and SEM observations were performed using representative reservoir fluid and core samples. The static adsorption of "medium-molecular" SRP reached equilibrium after 36 h, and the saturated adsorption capacity was 3.56 mg/g, which was approximately 2-5 times the dynamic adsorption capacity. For medium-molecular SRP, with a molecular mass of 7 million, the lower limit of the core permeability was 20-40 mD. When the permeability was less than 100 mD, the SRP concentration injected into the core could not exceed 900 mg/L. The oil displacement capacity of SRP decreased owing to the macromolecular hydration radius and the strong aggregation effect of SRP. Polymer adsorption and the retention of sand-carrying critically decreased water permeability. This study provides insights into SRP flooding under different geological conditions in the Daqing Oilfield and can help clarify the molecular mass and concentration of polymers with changes in the reservoir conditions.

2.
ACS Omega ; 6(1): 623-632, 2021 Jan 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33458514

RESUMO

Heavy oil emulsions such as water in oil (W/O), oil in water (O/W), and water in oil in water (W/O/W) would be formed during the development of heavy oil reservoirs. The key to the efficient development of heavy oil reservoirs is to clarify the fluidity of heavy oil emulsions in formation pores medium. In this study, the main factors that determine the fluidity of heavy oil emulsion were analyzed under the condition of simulating the formation pores medium. The reasons for the difference between the viscosity of heavy oil emulsions in formation pores medium and the viscosity measured by laboratory rheometer were analyzed. Then, experiments have confirmed the shortcomings of the current screening and evaluation method of emulsified viscosity reducer. Finally, through experimental research and mechanism analysis, the mechanism of the emulsified viscosity reducer was studied and suggestions were made to improve the effect of emulsified viscosity reducer in the oil field. When heavy emulsions flow in a formation pores medium, since the size of the droplets would be larger than the size of the pores medium, when the heavy emulsion passes through the pores medium, it would receive additional resistance brought by the Jiamin effect. But when a rheometer is used for viscosity testing, this additional resistance is almost nonexistent. Therefore, the current method of viscosity test using rheometer cannot fully reflect the actual flow state of heavy oil emulsion in formation pores medium. The research in this paper proves that the larger the droplets of the emulsion, the less accurate the rheometer test results. Temperature, permeability, oil-water ratio, and the type of emulsified viscosity reducer all have a certain effect on the flow of heavy oil emulsion in formation pores medium. This article evaluated four types of emulsified viscosity reducers. When the viscosity test was performed by a rheometer, the results showed excellent viscosity-reducing effects. However, when simulating formation pores medium conditions, the effects of some types of emulsified viscosity reducers are not so good. It is no longer accurate to judge the effect of emulsified viscosity reducer by the way of measuring viscosity with a rheometer. It should be screened by the flow capacity of the heavy oil emulsions in formation pores medium. In oil field development, the contact area of heavy oil and emulsified viscosity reducer solution should be increased as much as possible and provide more time for the substitution effect of emulsified viscosity reducer molecules.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...