Intraoperative electroencephalogram features related to frailty in older patients: an exploratory prospective observational study.

Frailty is an independent risk factor for the increased incidence of postoperative delirium (POD). To date, the effect of frailty on intraoperative electroencephalogram (EEG) changes remains unexplored. The present study, an exploratory analysis of a prospective cohort study, aimed to investigate the differences in EEG characteristics between frail and robust patients. This prospective observational study was conducted between December 2020 and November 2021. The preoperative frailty status was assessed using the FRAIL scale. The patients' baseline (before anesthesia) and intraoperative EEG data were collected using a brain function monitor. Finally, 20 robust and 26 frail older patients scheduled for elective spinal surgery or transurethral prostatectomy under propofol-based general anesthesia were included in the final analysis. Baseline and intraoperative EEG spectrogram and power spectra were compared between the frail and robust groups. No differences were observed in baseline EEG between the frail and robust groups. When the intraoperative EEG spectral parameters were compared, the alpha peak frequency (10.56 ± 0.49 vs. 10.14 ± 0.36 Hz, P = 0.002) and alpha peak, delta, theta, alpha, and beta powers were lower in the frail group. After adjusting for age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score, the FRAIL score was still negatively associated with total, delta, theta, alpha, and beta powers. Frail patients had reduced EEG (0-30 Hz) power after the induction of propofol-based general anesthesia. After adjusting for age, CCI, and MMSE score, frail patients still showed evidence of reduced δ, θ, α, and ß power.

EEG-derived pain threshold index-guided versus standard care during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: The pain threshold index (PTI), a novel index of nociception based on spontaneous EEG wavelet analysis, has been reported to provide reliable accuracy for predicting postoperative pain and hemodynamic reactivity. The present study is aimed to investigate whether PTI-guided analgesia reduces the pain intensity and rate of remedial analgesia in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Methods: A total of 122 females undergoing elective gynecologic surgeries had been randomized to receive either PTI-guided analgesia (PTI group) or standard clinical care (control group). Remifentanil administration in the PTI group was guided by PTI to maintain the value between 40 and 65, while that in the control group was guided by hemodynamic changes. The primary outcome was remedial analgesia rate in the PACU. The postoperative pain scores, intraoperative remifentanil requirements, opioid-related adverse events and perioperative serum stress hormone concentrations between the two groups were also compared. Findings: It was found that 23 of 58 patients (40%) in the control group and 8 of 58 patients (14%) in the PTI group needed remedial analgesia. The relative risk of receiving remedial analgesia was 2.88 (95% CI, 1.40-5.89, P = 0.002) in the control group. Sufentanil consumption in the PACU (µg) was lower in the PTI group (P = 0.002) than in the control group. Remifentanil and propofol consumption, opioid-related adverse events between these two groups were comparable. Implications: PTI-guided analgesia during gynaecologic operations resulted in 25.87% less remedial analgesia. However, studies with different PTI thresholds and larger, more diverse populations should be conducted to further demonstrate the clinical effectiveness of PTI.