A CT-based radiomics nomogram for prediction of lung adenocarcinomas and granulomatous lesions in patient with solitary sub-centimeter solid nodules.

PURPOSE: To develop a radiomics nomogram based on computed tomography (CT) images that can help differentiate lung adenocarcinomas and granulomatous lesions appearing as sub-centimeter solid nodules (SCSNs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 214 consecutive patients with SCSNs that were surgically resected and histologically confirmed as lung adenocarcinomas (n = 112) and granulomatous lesions (n = 102) from 2 medical institutions between October 2011 and June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients from center 1 ware enrolled as training cohort (n = 150) and patients from center 2 were included as external validation cohort (n = 64), respectively. Radiomics features were extracted from non-contrast chest CT images preoperatively. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was used for radiomics feature extraction and radiomics signature construction. Clinical characteristics, subjective CT findings, and radiomics signature were used to develop a predictive radiomics nomogram. The performance was examined by assessment of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Lung adenocarcinoma was significantly associated with an irregular margin and lobulated shape in the training set (p = 0.001, < 0.001) and external validation set (p = 0.016, = 0.018), respectively. The radiomics signature consisting of 22 features was significantly associated with lung adenocarcinomas of SCSNs (p < 0.001). The radiomics nomogram incorporated the radiomics signature, gender and lobulated shape. The AUCs of combined model in the training and external validation dataset were 0.885 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.823-0.931), 0.808 (95% CI: 0.690-0.896), respectively. Decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated that the radiomics nomogram was clinically useful. CONCLUSION: A radiomics signature based on non-enhanced CT has the potential to differentiate between lung adenocarcinomas and granulomatous lesions. The radiomics nomogram incorporating the radiomics signature and subjective findings may facilitate the individualized, preoperative treatment in patients with SCSNs.

Solitary solid pulmonary nodules: a CT-based deep learning nomogram helps differentiate tuberculosis granulomas from lung adenocarcinomas.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the differential diagnostic performance of a computed tomography (CT)-based deep learning nomogram (DLN) in identifying tuberculous granuloma (TBG) and lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) presenting as solitary solid pulmonary nodules (SSPNs). METHODS: Routine CT images of 550 patients with SSPNs were retrospectively obtained from two centers. A convolutional neural network was used to extract deep learning features from all lesions. The training set consisted of data for 218 patients. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression was used to create a deep learning signature (DLS). Clinical factors and CT-based subjective findings were combined in a clinical model. An individualized DLN incorporating DLS, clinical factors, and CT-based subjective findings was constructed to validate the diagnostic ability. The performance of the DLN was assessed by discrimination and calibration using internal (n = 140) and external validation cohorts (n = 192). RESULTS: DLS, gender, age, and lobulated shape were found to be independent predictors and were used to build the DLN. The combination showed better diagnostic accuracy than any single model evaluated using the net reclassification improvement method (p < 0.05). The areas under the curve in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts were 0.889 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.839-0.927), 0.879 (95% CI, 0.813-0.928), and 0.809 (95% CI, 0.746-0.862), respectively. Decision curve analysis and stratification analysis showed that the DLN has potential generalization ability. CONCLUSIONS: The CT-based DLN can preoperatively distinguish between LAC and TBG in patients presenting with SSPNs. KEY POINTS: • The deep learning nomogram was developed to preoperatively differentiate TBG from LAC in patients with SSPNs. • The performance of the deep learning feature was superior to that of the radiomics feature. • The deep learning nomogram achieved superior performance compared to the deep learning signature, the radiomics signature, or the clinical model alone.

Whole-Lesion Computed Tomography-Based Entropy Parameters for the Differentiation of Minimally Invasive and Invasive Adenocarcinomas Appearing as Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the differentiation of computed tomography (CT)-based entropy parameters between minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) lesions appearing as pulmonary subsolid nodules (SSNs). METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board in our hospital. From July 2015 to November 2018, 186 consecutive patients with solitary peripheral pulmonary SSNs that were pathologically confirmed as pulmonary adenocarcinomas (74 MIA and 112 IAC lesions) were included and subdivided into the training data set and the validation data set. Chest CT scans without contrast enhancement were performed in all patients preoperatively. The subjective CT features of the SSNs were reviewed and compared between the MIA and IAC groups. Each SSN was semisegmented with our in-house software, and entropy-related parameters were quantitatively extracted using another in-house software developed in the MATLAB platform. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performances. Three diagnostic models including subjective model, entropy model, and combined model were built and analyzed using area under the curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS: There were 119 nonsolid nodules and 67 part-solid nodules. Significant differences were found in the subjective CT features among nodule type, lesion size, lobulated shape, and irregular margin between the MIA and IAC groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that part-solid type and lobulated shape were significant independent factors for IAC (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Three entropy parameters including Entropy-0.8, Entropy-2.0-32, and Entropy-2.0-64 were identified as independent risk factors for the differentiation of MIA and IAC lesions. The median entropy model value of the MIA group was 0.266 (range, 0.174-0.590), which was significantly lower than the IAC group with value 0.815 (range, 0.623-0.901) (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the combined model had an excellent diagnostic performance with sensitivity of 88.2%, specificity of 73.0%, and accuracy of 82.1%. The AUC value of the combined model was significantly higher (AUC, 0.869) than that of the subjective model (AUC, 0.809) or the entropy model alone (AUC, 0.836) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The CT-based entropy parameters could help assess the aggressiveness of pulmonary adenocarcinoma via quantitative analysis of intratumoral heterogeneity. The MIA can be differentiated from IAC accurately by using entropy-related parameters in peripheral pulmonary SSNs.