Clinical features and associated factors of intraocular inflammation following intravitreal brolucizumab as switching therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to explore the clinical features and associated factors of intraocular inflammation (IOI) following intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) administration for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: This retrospective study included 87 eyes from 87 Japanese patients with nAMD who were followed up for 5 months after the initial administration of IVBr as switching therapy. Clinical pictures of IOI post-IVBr and changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 5 months were evaluated between eyes with and without IOI (non-IOI). The association between IOI and baseline factors (age, sex, BCVA, hypertension, and/or arteriosclerotic changes in the fundus, subretinal hyperreflective material [SHRM], and macular atrophy) was evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 87 eyes, 18 (20.6%) developed IOI and 2 (2.3%) developed retinal artery occlusion. There were 9 (50%) cases of posterior or pan-uveitis among eyes with IOI. The mean interval from initial IVBr administration to IOI was 2 months. The mean changes in logMAR BCVA at 5 months were significantly worse in IOI eyes than in non-IOI eyes (0.09 ± 0.22 vs. - 0.01 ± 0.15, P = 0.03). There were 8 (44.4%) and 7 (10.1%) cases of macular atrophy and 11 (61.1%) and 13 (18.8%) cases of SHRM in the IOI and non-IOI groups, respectively. SHRM and macular atrophy were significantly associated with IOI (P = 0.0008 and P = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: In IVBr therapy for nAMD, eyes with SHRM and/or macular atrophy should be observed more meticulously, given the increased risk of developing IOI, which is associated with insufficient BCVA gain.

Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome following BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.

Purpose: To report a case with multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) following BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Observations: Case: A 67-year-old Japanese female presented with central visual field loss and photopsia in the right eye (OD) for 5 days. She was complaining blurred vision with bright spots in vision in OD, but denied any ocular symptoms in left eye (OS). She had received the second dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) one day before the onset of visual symptoms; flu-like symptoms such as mild fever and general fatigue also developed along with ocular symptoms such as decreased vision and hypersensitivity to light in OD following the second COVID-19 vaccine. The first dose of vaccine was administrated followed three weeks later by the second dose and was not associated with any ocular or systemic symptoms besides mild pain at the injection site. She had not been followed by any ophthalmologist before the initial visit. At the initial visit, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in decimal points was 0.2 in OD and 1.0 in OS. Ophthalmic examination showed multifocal white dots in the posterior retina with moderate vitritis (1+ haze and 2+ cells) in OD. Multimodal imaging in OD showed diffuse disruption of ellipsoid zone with variable punctate hyperreflective lesions at macula on optical coherence tomography, punctate hyperfluorescence in a wreath-like pattern and late staining on fluorescein angiography, and multiple hypofluorescent spots of various sizes in the late phases on indocyanine green angiography. Both multiple hypofluorescent spots and scattered hyperfluorescent spots corresponding to white dots in OD were also seen on fundus autofluorescence. Her laboratory and systemic evaluations were negative for syphilis, tuberculosis, or toxoplasma, and selected autoimmune diseases like sarcoidosis, Behcet's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. No active intraocular inflammation or abnormality were seen in OS. One week later, the multifocal white dots disappeared in OD, and were almost invisible on fundus photography. At that time, multifocal electroretinogram showed decreased response with low amplitude density across the entire field in OD. The BCVA in OD spontaneously improved to 0.8 without any treatment. Collectively, these clinical course and findings were suggestive of a diagnosis of MEWDS after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Conclusions and importance: In this present case, BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination might have been associated with MEWDS-like entity with vision loss. It is important for physicians to monitor the ocular status carefully in patients with visual disturbance after COVID-19 vaccination.

Refined Internal Limiting Membrane Inverted Flap Technique for Intractable Macular Detachment with Optic Disc Pit.

PURPOSE: To report a surgical technique for retinal detachment associated with optic disc pit (ODP) by using an internal limiting membrane (ILM) inverted flap as an obstacle between the vitreous cavity and subretinal space. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old man presented with decreased visual acuity in the right eye for 1 week due to macular detachment associated with ODP. After 2 unsuccessful surgeries, the retina was reattached by vitrectomy with an ILM inverted flap onto the ODP. CONCLUSION: Covering the pit with an inverted ILM flap is a reliable method for intercepting fluid from the vitreous cavity. Immediate absorption of subretinal fluid may lead to early macular attachment. This technique would be effective in managing ODP.

The Comparison of the Surgical Outcome for the Full-Thickness Macular Hole with/without Lamellar Hole-Associated Epiretinal Proliferation.

AIMS: To compare the surgical outcome of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) with and without lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP). METHODS: This retrospective study included 158 eyes of 158 patients with FTMH treated with PPV. The following variables were analyzed: sex, age, preoperative best corrected visual acuity (pre-BCVA), BCVA 6 months after the surgery (6M-BCVA), the axial length of eye, the minimum diameter of FTMH, the diameter of basal side of FTMH, postoperative continuity of subfoveal ellipsoid zone (EZ) and external limiting membrane (ELM), and the preoperative presence of LHEP. RESULTS: Twenty-eight eyes had FTMH with LHEP and 130 without LHEP. The mean ± SD age (years) was 72.6 ± 7.9 and 68.6 ± 8.7, respectively (p = 0.02). 6M-BCVA was 0.38 ± 0.30 and 0.26 ± 0.25, respectively (p = 0.03). The diameter of basal side of FTMH (µm) was 901.5 ± 404.9 and 658.9 ± 288.1, respectively (p = 0.00027). EZ was disrupted in 24 eyes and 63 eyes, respectively (p = 0.00071). ELM was disrupted in 15 eyes and 23 eyes, respectively (p = 0.00015). The FTMH diameters and the presence of LHEP were inversely correlated with the continuity of EZ and ELM. CONCLUSION: The preoperative appearance of LHEP could be one of the prognostic factor for the treatment of FTMH.