Outcomes in obese kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation (KT) in obese patients is controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate patient and graft survival and post-transplantation complications between obese and nonobese recipients. METHODS: Patients (n = 3,054) receiving a KT from 1998 to 2008 were divided according to body mass index (BMI) into 3 groups for analysis: group I: BMI <30 kg/m(2) (nonobese); group II: ≥30-34.9 kg/m(2) (class I obese); and group III: ≥35 kg/m(2) (class II and III obese). RESULTS: Mean BMIs were: group I (n = 2,822): 22.6 ± 3.3 kg/m(2); group II (n = 185): 31.9 ± 1.3 kg/m(2); and group III (n = 47): 36.8 ± 1.7 kg/m(2). There were no differences among the 3 groups in patient demographic variables regarding race, sex, or organ source. One-year (I, 98%; II, 98%; III, 95%) and 5-year (I, 90%; II, 92%; III, 89%) patient survival rates were similar among groups. Graft survival rates at 1 year were 96% for groups I and II and 91.5% for group III. Five-year graft survivals were: I, 81%; II, 96%; and III, 79%. The most common cause of graft loss was death, and the main cause of death was infection in all groups. Obese patients were more likely to experience wound dehiscence (I, 1.9%; II, 7.6%; III, 19.1%; P < .001), develop new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT; I, 16.2%; II, 27%; III, 36%; P < .001), and have a prolonged length of hospital stay (I, 11.3 ± 11.4 d; II, 14.5 ± 14.3 d; III, 15.9 ± 16.7 d; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Obese recipients demonstrated outcomes similar to nonobese patients regarding patient and graft survival. However, they had higher rates of prolonged length of hospital stay, wound dehiscence, and NODAT.

Risk factors associated with graft loss and patient survival after kidney transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of traditional risk factors on major kidney transplantation outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from kidney transplantation procedures performed between 2003 and 2006 were retrospectively analyzed for the influence of traditional risk factors on transplantation outcome. Of 2364 transplants, 67% were from living donors, 27% were from donors who met standard criteria, and 6% were from donor who met expanded criteria. Two hundred thirty-nine procedures (10%) were performed in pediatric patients. Immunosuppression was selected on the basis of subgroup population. RESULTS: At 1 year posttransplantation, cumulative freedom from a treated acute rejection episode (ARE) was 76.7%, with no difference between black vs nonblack recipients (75.0% vs 73.4%; P = .79). At 2 years, survival for patients (95.3% vs 88.3% vs 82.1%; P < .001) and grafts 92.3% vs 80.3% vs 70.9%; P < .001) was better in recipients of living donor grafts compared with donors who met standard or expanded criteria, respectively. Moreover, graft survival was poorer in black vs nonblack patients (83.6% vs 88.7%; P < .05) because of high mortality (13% vs 7%; P<.001). Risk factors associated with death included cadaveric donor organ (odds ratio [OR], 2.4) and black race (OR, 1.8), and risk factors associated with graft loss included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.1), extended-criteria criteria donor organ (OR, 2.0), delayed graft function (OR, 1.8), and any ARE (OR, 3.5). At 6 months posttransplantation, risk factors associated with death included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.5) or ARE (OR, 2.4), and risk factors associated with graft loss included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.0), extended-criteria donor organ (OR, 2.6), ARE (OR, 9.5), and impaired graft function (creatinine concentration >1.5 mg/dL; OR, 2.1). CONCLUSION: Traditional risk factors are still associated with transplantation outcome. Poorer graft survival in black vs nonblack recipients was due to higher mortality rather than graft loss.