RESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVES: To review the main published current neuroprotection research trends and results in spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: This paper is the result of a collaboration between a group of European scientists. METHODS: Recent studies, especially in genetic, immune, histochemical and bio (nano)-technological fields, have provided new insight into the cellular and molecular mechanisms occurring within the central nervous system (NS), including SCIs. As a consequence, a new spectrum of therapies aiming to antagonize the 'secondary injury' pathways (that is, to provide neuroprotection) and also to repair such classically irreparable structures is emerging. We reviewed the most significant published works related to such novel, but not yet entirely validated, clinical practice therapies. RESULTS: There have been identified many molecules, primarily expressed by heterogenous glial and neural subpopulations of cells, which are directly or indirectly critical for tissue damaging/sparing/re-growth inhibiting, angiogenesis and neural plasticity, and also various substances/energy vectors with regenerative properties, such as MAG (myelin-associated glycoprotein), Omgp (oligodendrocyte myelin glycoprotein), KDI (synthetic: Lysine-Asparagine-Isoleucine 'gamma-1 of Laminin Kainat Domain'), Nogo (Neurite outgrowth inhibitor), NgR (Nogo protein Receptor), the Rho signaling pathway (superfamily of 'Rho-dopsin gene-including neurotransmitter-receptors'), EphA4 (Ephrine), GFAP (Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein), different subtypes of serotonergic and glutamatergic receptors, antigens, antibodies, immune modulators, adhesion molecules, scavengers, neurotrophic factors, enzymes, hormones, collagen scar inhibitors, remyelinating agents and neurogenetic/plasticity inducers, all aiming to preserve/re-establish the morphology and functional connections across the lesion site. Accordingly, modern research and experimental SCI therapies focus on several intricate, rather overlapping, therapeutic objectives and means, such as neuroprotective, neurotrophic, neurorestorative, neuroreparative, neuroregenerative, neuro(re)constructive and neurogenetic interventions. CONCLUSION: The first three of these therapeutical directions are generically assimilated as neuroprotective, and are synthetically presented and commented in this paper in an attempt to conceptually systematize them; thus, the aim of this article is, by emphasizing the state-of-the art in the domain, to optimize theoretical support in selecting the most effective pharmacological and physical interventions for preventing, as much as possible, paralysis, and for maximizing recovery chances after SCI.