Comparison of different methods of inter-eye asymmetry of rim area and disc area analysis.

PURPOSE: To describe different methods of inter-eye asymmetry of rim area (RA) to disc area (DA) asymmetry ratio (RADAAR) analysis. METHODS: This was an observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study. Both the eyes of all participants underwent confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT 3)), frequency-doubling technology perimetry (FDT), and complete ophthalmological examination. Based on ophthalmological clinical examination and FDT results of the worse eye, subjects were classified as either normal, possible glaucoma, and probable glaucoma or definitive glaucoma. RADAAR values were calculated based on stereometric HRT 3 values using different mathematical formulae. RADAAR-1 was calculated as a relative difference of rim and DAs between the eyes. RADAAR-2 was calculated by subtracting the value of rim to DA ratio of the smaller disc from the value of rim to DA ratio of the larger disc. RADAAR-3 was calculated by dividing the previous two values. Statistical analyses included ANOVA as well as Student t-tests. RESULTS: Data of 334 participants were analysed, 78 of which were classified as definitive glaucoma. RADAAR-1 values were significantly different between the four different groups of diagnosis (F=5.82; P<0.001). The 1st and 99th percentile limits of normality for RADAAR-1, RADAAR-2, and RADAAR-3 in normal group were, respectively, -10.64 and 8.4; -0.32 and 0.22; and 0.58 and 1.32. CONCLUSIONS: RADAAR-1 seems to best distinguish between the diagnostic groups. Knowledge of RADAAR distribution in various diagnostic groups may aid in clinical diagnosis of asymmetric glaucomatous damage.

Intraocular pressure adjusted for central corneal thickness as a screening tool for open-angle glaucoma in an at-risk population.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of intraocular pressure (IOP) adjusted for central corneal thickness (CCT) screening for open-angle glaucoma (OAG) in an at-risk population. STUDY DESIGN: Community-based screening clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and forty-nine persons of black race, or >50 years of age, or with a positive family history of glaucoma. METHODS: Ophthalmological examination including Goldmann applanation tonometry, ultrasonographic corneal pachymetry, and visual field testing. Glaucomatous optic nerve damage with visual field loss was the gold standard. IOP was adjusted for CCT based on 3 nomograms. Results were compared with screening using unadjusted IOP. Outcome measures included sensitivity, specificity, areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs), as well as positive and negative likelihood ratios. RESULTS: No significant difference in CCT was found between those with glaucoma (560 [SD 37] microm, n = 31) and those without (557 [SD 35] microm, n = 233). Screening adjusted IOPs for glaucoma with an IOP > 21 mm Hg resulted in PPVs of 23.8% to 25% and NPVs of 89.3% to 89.6%, similar to preadjustment values. Areas under the ROC curves varied from 0.544 to 0.571 post adjustment from the initial value of 0.574. CONCLUSIONS: IOP adjusted for CCT is unlikely to improve tonometry as a screening tool for OAG in an at-risk population.

Comparison between confocal scanning laser tomography, scanning laser polarimetry and optical coherence tomography on the ability to detect localised retinal nerve fibre layer defects in glaucoma patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare the ability of confocal scanning laser tomography (CSLT), scanning laser polarimetry (SLP) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in recognising localised retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) defects. METHODS: 51 eyes from 43 patients with glaucoma were identified by two observers as having RNFL defects visible on optic disc photographs. 51 eyes of 32 normal subjects were used as controls. Three masked observers evaluated CSLT, SLP and OCT images to determine subjectively the presence of localised RNFL defects. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was highest with OCT, followed by SLP and CSLT (mean kappa: 0.83, 0.69 and 0.64, respectively). RNFL defects were identified in 58.8% of CSLT, 66.7% of SLP and 54.9% of OCT (p = 0.02 between SLP and OCT) by at least two observers. In the controls, 94.1% of CSLT, 84.3% of SLP and 94.1% of OCT scans, respectively, were rated as normal (p = 0.02 between CSLT and SLP, and SLP and OCT). CONCLUSION: Approximately 20-40% of localised RNFL defects identified by colour optic disc photographs are not detected by CSLT, SPL or OCT. SLP showed a higher number of false-positive results than the other techniques, but also had a higher proportion of correctly identified RNFL defects in the glaucoma population.

Comparison of the 20-MHz ultrasound probe with ultrasound biomicroscopy in glaucoma.

The 20-MHz ultrasound probe was compared with ultrasound biomicroscopy to determine its usefulness in imaging various glaucomatous conditions. Ten patients with glaucoma underwent anterior segment imaging with both the 20-MHz probe, which attaches to the I3 B-scan (Innovative Imaging Inc., Sacramento, CA), and the Ultrasonic BioMicroscope (UBM; Paradigm Medical Industries, Salt Lake City, UT). All pathology was easily demonstrable using the 20-MHz probe, in one case showing a retinal detachment not seen with the UBM. However, anterior findings such as fluid in the suprachoroidal space and sclerostomy sites in postoperative trabeculectomy cases were more difficult to view with the 20-MHz probe. The use of coupling enhanced the quality of the latter images. The 20-MHz ultrasound probe may be a viable aid in diagnosis and follow-up of certain glaucomatous conditions, and the use of a coupling device enhances its images.