RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The study investigated the repeatability of brain diffusion-based stiffness prediction (DWIstiff) in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Thirty-one healthy volunteers were examined with DWIstiff using two different sets of b-values: b200-1500 s/mm2 (DWIstiff, 1500) and b200-1000 s/mm2 (DWIstiff, 1000). Each b-value set was scanned twice per imaging session without repositioning the participants. DWIstiff images were reconstructed from each set. Two observers delineated regions of interest (ROIs) on each DWIstiff image. The repeatability coefficient (RC), coefficient of variation (CV), inter- and intraobserver agreement were calculated. RESULTS: After excluding three participants due to image artifacts, the study included twenty-eight volunteers (mean age (range)) 37 years (24-62), 10 males, 18 females). For DWIstiff, 1500, the lowest and the highest RCs were in the parietal lobe (0.52) and respectively the brain stem (1.17). The lowest RC for DWIstiff, 1000 was in the frontal lobe (0.42) and the highest in the brain stem (1.58). The CV for whole brain measurements was 3.83 % for DWIstiff, 1500 and 4.93 % for DWIstiff, 1000. The BlandâAltman (BA) limits of agreement (LoA) for the intraobserver agreement of DWIstiff, 1500 were -0.90 to 1.06 and respectively -0.78 to 0.88 for DWIstiff, 1000. Regarding interobserver agreement, the LoA were -0.85 to 0.94 for DWIstiff, 1500 and -0.61 to 0.66 for DWIstiff, 1000. CONCLUSION: DWIstiff is a precise technique with some observer dependence. Repeatability is higher for DWIstiff, 1000 s/mm2 than for DWIstiff 1500 s/mm2. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Our findings suggest that DWIstiff can reliably detect stiffness changes larger than 4.93 % in healthy volunteers. Further studies should investigate whether the repeatability of DWIstiff may be affected by the presence of pathology such as a brain tumor.
