Omitting repetitive clerking does not disadvantage cardiology patients and reduces duplication.

Nottingham University Hospital's cardiology department receives an average of 320 admissions via the emergency department (ED) monthly. The majority are out-of-hours. In ED, admissions are clerked by ED doctors as well as the specialist cardiology advanced nursing team (CATS). Upon transfer to cardiology, they are then re-clerked by an on-call junior doctor (JD). Our aim in this quality improvement project was to investigate the benefit of re-clerking cardiology patients by the JD. The CATS team clerking and plan were directly compared to the JD's plan across 100 patients by two reviewers. Data were also collected on the time spent performing a clerking by nine JDs. An alternative form of reviewing patients, which involved the JD reviewing the CATS clerking, bloods, observations and discussing with nursing staff, was performed in 29 cases. In 5% of cases a JD changed the management plan. Three cases were flagged to doctors by nursing staff, and two cases involved starting oral antibiotics. The average time spent clerking patients previously was 49.5 +/212 minutes (mean+/2SD). In the new method, this was 12.5 +/23 minutes. We conclude that 0mitting repetitive clerking does not disadvantage patients, while saving time for on-call JDs. Patients are also not woken up unnecessarily overnight, which may reduce the risk of delirium. We plan to rationalise our admission system.

One-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Hybrid CTO Revascularization Strategy After Hospital Discharge: A Subanalysis of the Multicenter RECHARGE Registry.

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO) has historically been associated with higher event rates during follow-up. The hybrid algorithm and contemporary wiring and dissection re-entry (DR) techniques can potentially improve long-term outcomes after CTO-PCI. This study assessed the long-term clinical outcomes of the hybrid CTO practice, when applied by operators with varying experience levels. METHODS: We examined the 1-year clinical events after hospital discharge of the RECHARGE population, according to technical outcome and final technique. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate. Centers that provided ≥90% complete 12-month follow-up were included. RESULTS: Follow-up data of 1067 out of 1165 patients (92%) were provided by 13 centers. Mean follow-up duration was 362.8 ± 0.9 days. One-year MACE-free survival rate was 91.3% (974/1067). MACE included death (1.9%; n = 20), myocardial infarction (1.4%; n = 15), target-vessel failure (5.9%; n = 63), and target-vessel revascularization (TVR) (5.5%; n = 59). Non-TVR was performed in 6.7% (n = 71). MACE was significantly in favor of successful CTO-PCI (8.0% vs 13%; P=.04), even after adjusting for baseline differences (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.98; P=.04). Other events, including individual MACE components, were comparable with respect to technical outcome and final technique (DR vs non-DR techniques). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the hybrid algorithm with contemporary techniques by moderate to highly experienced operators for CTO-PCI is safe and associated with a low 1-year event rate. Successful procedures are associated with a better MACE rate. DR techniques can be used as first-line strategies alongside intimal wiring techniques without compromising clinical outcomes.

The Hybrid Algorithm for Treating Chronic Total Occlusions in Europe: The RECHARGE Registry.

BACKGROUND: The hybrid algorithm for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was developed to improve procedural outcomes. Large, prospective studies validating the algorithm in a broad multicenter setting with operators of different experience levels are lacking. OBJECTIVES: The RECHARGE (REgistry of Crossboss and Hybrid procedures in FrAnce, the NetheRlands, BelGium and UnitEd Kingdom) registry aims to report achievable results using the hybrid algorithm. METHODS: Between January 2014 and October 2015, consecutive patients undergoing hybrid CTO-PCI were prospectively enrolled in 17 centers. Procedural techniques, outcomes, and in-hospital complications were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1,253 CTO-PCIs were performed in 1,177 patients, of which 86% were men. Mean age was 66 ± 11 years. The average Japanese CTO score was 2.0 ± 1.0, and was higher in the failure group (2.6 ± 0.6 vs. 1.9 ± 1.0; p < 0.001). Overall procedure success was 86% and major in-hospital complications occurred in 2.6%. Antegrade wire escalation was the preferred primary strategy in 77%, followed by retrograde (17%) and antegrade dissection re-entry strategies (7%). Primary strategies were successful in 60%. Consecutive strategies were applied in 34% and were successful in 74%. Antegrade dissection re-entry and retrograde strategies were the most common bailout strategies and were successful in 67% and 62%, respectively. Median procedure and fluoroscopy time were 90 (interquartile range [IQR]: 60 to 120) min and 35 (IQR: 21 to 55) min, contrast volume was 250 (IQR: 180 to 340) ml, and radiation doses (air kerma and dose area product) were 1.6 (IQR: 1.0 to 2.7) Gy and 98 (IQR: 57 to 168) Gy·cm2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: High procedure and patient success rates, combined with a low event rate and improved procedural characteristics, support further use of the hybrid algorithm for a broad community of appropriately trained CTO operators.

Relationship Between Femoral Vascular Closure Devices and Short-Term Mortality From 271 845 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures Performed in the United Kingdom Between 2006 and 2011: A Propensity Score-Corrected Analysis From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.

BACKGROUND: The impact of vascular closure devices (VCDs) via the femoral arterial access site on short-term mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is currently unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: The association between femoral arterial vascular access site management (manual pressure [including external clamp] versus VCD) and 30-day mortality was examined in a national real-world registry of 271 845 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for elective, non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction indications in the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2011. Crude and propensity score-corrected analyses were performed using Cox regression, with additional analyses undertaken in clinically relevant subgroups; 40.1% (n=109 001) of subjects were treated with manual pressure and 59.9% (n=162 844) with VCD. Subjects treated with VCD had fewer comorbidities and were less likely to present with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (P<0.001). Crude 30-day mortality was lower in the group treated with VCD compared with manual pressure (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.61; 1.4% versus 2.4%, log rank P<0.0001), findings that were substantially reduced but persisted after propensity score correction (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.97; 1.8% versus 2.0% versus P<0.001). A more pronounced association of VCD with a reduction in 30-day mortality was evident in females (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.94; Pinteraction=0.037), presentation with acute coronary syndrome (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.94; Pinteraction=0.0027), or recent lysis (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-1.01; Pinteraction=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with manual pressure, VCD was associated with a minor short-term (30-day) prognostic benefit after propensity score correction in the global population and clinically relevant subgroups. The potential for residual confounding factors impacting on short-term mortality cannot be excluded, despite the study having measured and balanced all recorded confounder factors.

Early invasive versus conservative treatment in patients with failed fibrinolysis--no late survival benefit: the final analysis of the Middlesbrough Early Revascularisation to Limit Infarction (MERLIN) randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Early (30 days) and midterm (6 months) clinical outcomes in trials comparing rescue angioplasty (rescue percutaneous coronary intervention [rPCI]) with conservative treatment of failed fibrinolysis complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction have shown variable results. Whether early rPCI confers late (up to 3 years) clinical benefits is not known. METHODS: The MERLIN trial compared rPCI and a conservative strategy in patients with failed fibrinolysis complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Three hundred seven patients with electrocardiographic evidence of failure to reperfuse at 60 minutes were included. Patients in cardiogenic shock were excluded. Thirty-day and 1-year results have been reported. Results of 3 years of follow-up are presented. RESULTS: Three-year mortality in the conservative arm and rPCI, respectively, was 16.9% versus 17.6% (P = .9, relative difference [RD] -0.8, 95% CI [-9.3 to 7.8]). Death rates were similar (3.9% vs 3.2%) between 1- and 3-year follow-up, respectively. The incidence of the composite secondary end point of death, reinfarction, stroke, unplanned revascularization, or heart failure was significantly higher in the conservative arm (64.3% vs 49%, P = .01, RD 15.3, 95% CI [4.2-26]). There was no significant difference in the rate of reinfarction (0.7% vs 0.7%) or heart failure (1.3% vs 2.7%) between 1 and 3 years between the conservative and rPCI arms, respectively. The incidence of subsequent unplanned revascularization at 3 years was significantly higher in the conservative arm (33.8% vs 14.4%, P < .01, RD 19.4, 95% CI [10-28.7]), most of which occurred within 1 year; the rates between 1 and 3 years were 3.9% in the conservative arm versus 2% in the rPCI arm. There was a trend toward fewer strokes in the conservative arm at 3 years (conservative arm 2.6% vs rPCI 6.5%, P = .1, RD -3.9%, 95% CI [-9.4 to 0.8]), with similar stroke rates (1.3% vs 1.3%) between 1- and 3-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Rescue angioplasty did not confer a late survival advantage at 3 years. The composite end point occurred less often in the rPCI arm mainly because of fewer unplanned revascularization procedures in the early phase of follow-up. The highest risk of clinical events in patients with failed reperfusion is in the first year, beyond which the rate of clinical events is low.

A randomized trial of prophylactic antiarrhythmic agents (amiodarone and sotalol) in patients with atrial fibrillation for whom direct current cardioversion is planned.

UNLABELLED: Antiarrhythmic agents enhance maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR) after direct current cardioversion (DCC) for atrial fibrillation but there are few comparative trials. BACKGROUND: The aims of the study were (1) to establish whether patients successfully cardioverted to SR are more likely to stay in SR over 6 months if taking amiodarone or sotalol, and if so, to establish whether one agent is better than the other; (2) to establish whether taking amiodarone or sotalol is better at achieving chemical cardioversion within the 6 weeks before DCC; and (3) to establish whether DCC is more likely to be successful on a drug. METHODS: Randomized, prospective, nonblinded, controlled study of treatment with either amiodarone (n = 27), sotalol (n = 36), or no antiarrhythmic agent (n = 31). RESULTS: Chemical cardioversion occurred in 7 patients in the amiodarone group (A), 7 patients in the sotalol group (S), but none in the no-antiarrhythmic group (N). A total of 33 (92%) patients in the sotalol group, 22 (81%) patients in the amiodarone group, and 23 (74%) patients in the no-antiarrhythmic group were in SR after cardioversion. Of the original cohort of patients, 17 (63%) patients in the amiodarone group remained in SR at 6-month follow-up, compared with 14 (39%) in the sotalol group and 5 (16%) in the no-antiarrhythmic group (A vs N, P < .0002, P < .0006B [after Bonferroni correction]; A vs S, P = .05, P = .15B; and S vs N, P = .03, P = .09B). CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone and sotalol achieved chemical cardioversion before planned electrical cardioversion in 26% and 19% of patients, respectively. After successful cardioversion, amiodarone appears better than sotalol at maintaining SR at 6 months.

A prospective, randomized trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iobitridol 350 (Xenetix) in cardiac catheterization.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular contrast agents presently used in modern digital catheter laboratories during cardiac catheterization are superior to older agents as regards patient tolerance. There are, however, significant differences between these agents. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of early (< 24 hours) and late (> 24 hours to 7 days) reactions to 2 contrast agents currently used during cardiac catheterization: iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iobitridol 350 (Xenetix). METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial. Two thousand and nineteen patients undergoing cardiac catheterization received one of the following contrast agents: iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iobitridol 350 (Xenetix). Reactions that were possibly related to the contrast agents were recorded during hospital admission (early reaction) and after discharge (late reaction) by means of a questionnaire. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were matched in both the groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of heat sensation experienced between the 2 groups, (p = 0.1). Early non-heat reactions occurred in 3.2% of patients receiving iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and 3.6% of those receiving iobitridol 350 (Xenetix), (p = 0.65). Electrocardiographic changes were recorded in 0.7% of patients who received iopamidol 340 (Niopam), and 2.6% of those who received iobitridol 350 (Xenetix), (p = < 0.01). Seven patients (0.8%) receiving iobitridol 350 suffered ventricular fibrillation requiring DC cardioversion compared with none in the iopamidol 340 group (p = < 0.01). Late reactions (post discharge symptoms) occurred in 13.9% of those receiving iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and 18.5% of those receiving iobitridol 350 (Xenetix) (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Iobitridol 350 (Xenetix) was associated with more ECG changes and, importantly, ventricular fibrillation, than iopamidol (Niopam). There were no features to suggest other benefits from iobitridol 350. These results suggest that iopamidol 340 is a preferable contrast agent in cardiac catheterization.

A randomized trial of rescue angioplasty versus a conservative approach for failed fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit INfarction (MERLIN) trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare emergency coronary angiography with or without rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with conservative treatment in patients with failed fibrinolysis complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: Most patients with STEMI receive fibrinolytic therapy and aspirin. The management of failed fibrinolysis is unclear. METHODS: A total of 307 patients with STEMI and failed fibrinolysis were randomized to emergency coronary angiography with or without rescue PCI or conservative treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-day all-cause mortality was similar in the rescue and conservative groups (9.8% vs. 11%, p = 0.7, risk difference [RD] 1.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.8 to 8.3). The composite secondary end point of death/re-infarction/stroke/subsequent revascularization/heart failure occurred less frequently in the rescue group (37.3% vs. 50%, p = 0.02, RD 12.7%, 95% CI 1.6 to 23.5), driven by less subsequent revascularization (6.5% vs. 20.1%, p < 0.01, RD 13.6%, 95% CI 6.2 to 21.4). Re-infarction and clinical heart failure were less common in the rescue group (7.2% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.3, RD 3.2%, 95% CI -3.3 to 9.9; and 24.2% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.3, RD 5.7%, 95% CI -4.3 to 15.6, respectively). Strokes and transfusions were more common in the rescue group (4.6% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.03, RD 3.9%, 95% CI 0.5 to 8.6; and 11.1% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001, RD 9.8%, 95% CI 4.9 to 19.9, respectively). Left ventricular function at 30 days was the same in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Rescue angioplasty did not improve survival by 30 days, but improved event-free survival, almost completely due to a reduction in subsequent revascularization. Rescue angioplasty was associated with more strokes and more transfusions and did not result in preservation of left ventricular systolic function at 30 days.