Resectoscopic surgery in women with abnormal uterine bleeding and nonatypical endometrial hyperplasia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of resectoscopic surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of women with abnormal uterine bleeding and endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-five women with simple and seven with complex hyperplasia. INTERVENTION: Hysteroscopic endometrial ablation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In patients with simple hyperplasia, average age, parity, body mass index, and mean arterial pressure were 53.2 years, 2.4 pregnancies, 30 kg/m2, and 99.5 mm Hg, respectively; in those with complex hyperplasia corresponding figures were 48 years, 2 pregnancies, 36 kg/m2, and 100 mm Hg. Nineteen of 32 women had postmenopausal bleeding, 9 of whom were taking combined hormone replacement therapy. Two had subsequent hysterectomies, one for pain and the other for incomplete resection due to an enlarged uterus. Resection could not be completed in one morbidly obese woman. One patient died from heart disease. During the follow-up of 1 to 8 years (mean 4 yrs) all patients remained amenorrheic with no evidence of recurrent disease or progression to cancer. CONCLUSION: Resectoscopic surgery by experienced hysteroscopists may be effective therapy for endometrial hyperplasia without atypia, especially in women at high risk for medical therapy or hysterectomy. Patient surveillance is mandatory for early detection and management of recurrent disease and progression to cancer.

Resectoscopic surgery in 10 women with abnormal uterine bleeding and atypical endometrial hyperplasia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of the resectoscope in the diagnosis and treatment of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia. DESIGN: Retrospective case series (Canadian Task Force classification III-3). SETTING: University-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Ten women. Intervention. Hysteroscopic evaluation after preoperative endometrial biopsy indicated simple hyperplasia without atypia, complex hyperplasia with atypia, or inadequate specimen. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Atypical hyperplasia was confirmed in eight patients after total endomyometrial resection. Hysterectomy was offered to all patients but accepted by only two: one for bilateral ovarian serous cystadenomas and the second for a granulosa cell ovarian tumor. No residual endometrium was found in hysterectomy specimens. Seven women were amenorrheic and well 1 to 9 years after resection. An additional patient with amenorrhea died from colon cancer 2 years after resection. CONCLUSION: Resectoscopic surgery confirmed or detected atypical endometrial hyperplasia in eight women and excluded it in two patients with AUB and a previous diagnosis of simple hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, or inadequate specimen. Skillful resectoscopic surgery may be an alternative to hysterectomy in selected patients with atypical hyperplasia who are compliant with regular and long-term follow-up.

Endometrial adenocarcinoma encountered at the time of hysteroscopic endometrial ablation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy and possible role of treatment of hysteroscopic endometrial resection in women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) diagnosed with endometrial adenocarcinoma. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University-affiliated center. PATIENTS: Thirteen women with AUB and eight with postmenopausal bleeding. INTERVENTION: Preablation endometrial office biopsy and hysteroscopic evaluation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preablation endometrial biopsy was inadequate, inconclusive, or difficult to obtain in these women, and endometrial cancer was found at the time of resectoscopic surgery. Total endomyometrial resection including the tubal ostia was completed in eight women (group 1) and partial resection in five (group 2). Endometrial adenocarcinoma was confirmed histologically in all patients. A small focus of cancer was found in only two women in group 1 after total resection; in one the procedure was performed 9 years earlier and in the other it was completed hastily after absorption of 800 ml of 1.5% glycine irrigation solution. In women in group 2 malignancy was highly suspected and total resection was considered unwise. CONCLUSION: All patients were alive and well 0.5 to 9 years after hysterectomy, with no evidence of recurrent cancer.