RESUMO
Background: The utilization of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) strategy is a beneficial approach in integrating the knowledge and proficiencies of various fields to produce thorough and advantageous cancer treatment plans for patients. Nevertheless, MDT has yet to be widely adopted in Indonesia. In this study, the authors examined an early form of MDT in Indonesia that does not involve dedicated meetings, referred as independent multidisciplinary work (IMW). The objective is to investigate the differences in survival rates of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients who underwent treatment with and without IMW. Materials and methods: This study has a retrospective cohort design. Data were collected from the medical records of newly diagnosed stage 3 and 4 NPC patients between 2016 and 2018. The subjects were divided into two groups: the IMW group and the non-IMW group. The primary end point of the study is overall survival rate between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test, and cox proportional hazard analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results: This study included a total of 124 patients with NPC, 81 patients in the IMW group and 43 patients in the non-IMW group. At the end of the 36-month follow-up period, the median survival of the IMW group was not reached, while in the non-IMW, it was 12 months [95% confidence intervals (95% CI), 8.78-15.22], hazard ratio (HR): 0.47 (95% CI, 0.28-0.78; P<0.01). The 1-year survival rate was 66.7% in the IMW group versus 46.5% in the non-IMW group (HR=0.7, 95% CI 0.49-0.99; P=0.03); the 2-year survival rate was 40.7% in the IMW group versus 16.3% in the non-IMW group (HR=0.4, 95% CI 0.19-0.83; P<0.01). Daniel Rizky, Vina Yunarvika, and Yasjudan Rastrama Putra, these authors contributed equally to this work. In the multivariate analysis, the IMW approach, ECOG (The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) status, distant metastasis, and treatment approach were significantly associated with survival outcome. Conclusion: The use of IMW approach in the treatment of NPC was associated with a better survival outcome compared to non-IMW treatment.
RESUMO
AIM: to determine whether serum HER-2/neu level could be used as a prognostic factor in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: a prospective cohort study was done in LABC and MBC patients in dr. Sardjito Hospital Yogyakarta from April 2006 to March 2008. Serum concentration of HER-2/neu was measured by ELISA done before and after chemotherapy. HER-2/neu expression tissue examination was done by immunohistochemistry. The clinical responses on therapy, survival and progression were recorded. RESULTS: twenty seven cases were obtained. Average concentration of serum HER-2/neu was 21.02 ± 7.1 ng/ml. The level of serum HER-2/neu in LABC was lower than MBC (17.21 ng/ml vs 28.64 ng/ml; p=0.32). Average concentration of serum HER-2/neu in partial responders was 13.20 ng/ml (95% Cl 0.142 - 26.25), stable responders was 19.42 ng/ml (95% Cl -0.255 - 39.09) and 29.35 ng/ml(95% Cl 1.95 - 56.74) in progressors (p=0.468). Patients with better clinical response had a lower average HER-2/neu serum level (16.12 ng/ml vs 29.35 ng/ml; p=0.247). HER-2/neu over expression was found in 40.7% of the tissues, 44% of LABC and 33.3% of MBC tissues (p=0.692). Negative HER-2/neu tissue protein expression had better clinical response (75% vs 45.5% p=0.224), and longer survival (p=0.08). CONCLUSION: neither the expression of HER-2/neu in the tissue nor the level of serum HER-2/neu can be used as clinical prognosis factor on advanced stage breast cancer in our study population.
