Risk factors of emerging multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in burn patients at burn Unit of Dr. Soetomo Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Burn injury patients are at high risk of infection as a result of the nature of the burn injury itself, including prolonged hospital stays, antibiotics use, treatment procedures, etc. In this era, nosocomial infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii (A.ba) have increased significantly. This study was conducted to investigate the micro-organism pattern and the risk factors for burn patients with multi-drug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii (A.ba) in the Burn Unit at Dr. Soetomo Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational study among burn patients with A.ba admitted to the Burn Unit at Dr. Soetomo Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021. Potential risk factors for MDR-A.ba were analysed by univariate and multivariate analysis. The patients diagnosed with MDR-A.ba wound infection were included in the case group. The patients diagnosed with non MDR, these are: (1) the patients isolated micro-organisms other than A.ba, (2) sterile isolates, and (3) the patients isolated as A.ba but not MDR, were included in the control group. RESULTS: A total of 120 burn patients were included in this study. During this study, 24% burn patients were found to have Acinetobacter baumannii and 79% (from 24% of Acinetobacter baumannii) had MDR-A.ba. According to univariate analysis, risk factors that significant were: Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI) (p = 0,002; OR: 6.10; CI: 1,68 - 21,57); hospital Length Of Stay (LOS) (p < 0,000; OR: 6.95; CI: 2,56 - 18,91) and comorbid (p = 0,006; OR: 3,72; CI: 1,44 - 9,58). But, after analysed by multivariate analysis, only ABSI was the significant factor (p = 0,010; OR: 1,70; CI: 1,23 - 2,36). CONCLUSION: Based on univariate analysis, the significant risk factors for MDR-A.ba were: ABSI, hospital length of stay and comorbid. But after adjusted by multivariate analysis, only ABSI was the significant factor.

Comparison of the antiseptic effectiveness of octenidine dihydrochloride with povidone-iodine for Acinetobacter baumannii contaminated wounds in Wistar rat.

INTRODUCTION: Effective antiseptic use is essential in healthcare settings to prevent the spread of diseases, especially in areas with high patient traffic and exposure to various pathogens. One essential pathogenic germ is Acinetobacter baumannii. Octenidine and povidone-iodine have been demonstrated to be effective against A. baumannii in vitro. This study will compare octenidine dihydrochloride and povidone-iodine as wound-cleansing solutions for wounds contaminated with A. baumannii in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four rats were divided into three groups: normal saline, octenidine dihydrochloride and povidone-iodine. Wounds were made on the rats' backs, and A. baumannii germs were inoculated into the wounds. After 3 hours, the wound was irrigated with wound cleansing solution according to the group for 30 seconds. Each wound was taken swab culture before and after wound irrigation and tissue culture 5 hours after wound irrigation. RESULTS: All specimens showed bacterial colony growth with a median value of 1.22 × 105 CFU before irrigation. Wound irrigation with normal saline did not reduce colony counts, while there was a 3-log reduction to 5-log reduction in the octenidine and povidone-iodine groups. Statistically, there was no significant difference in the mean number of colonies between the octenidine and povidone-iodine groups after irrigation (p = 0.535). However, 3 hours after irrigation, all specimens that experienced 3-log reduction showed regrowth to more than 1 × 105 CFU. In contrast, specimens subjected to 5-log reduction did not exhibit any regrowth. CONCLUSION: The antiseptic effectiveness of octenidine dihydrochloride is equivalent to povidone-iodine in eradicating A. baumannii colonies in wounds in vivo.