Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Orthop Belg ; 75(2): 252-7, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19492566

RESUMO

In a prospective study we assessed 440 patients, sequentially admitted to the trauma unit with hip fracture. Of the 403 who had a swab on admission, 5.2% (21/403) were found to be colonised with MRSA. Fifty two percent of MRSA colonised patients were admitted from their own home, 29% from residential homes and 19% from nursing homes. MRSA colonisation was found in 3.6% of patients admitted from their own home, 10.9% of residential home patients, and 17.4% of nursing home patients. A high proportion (80.9%) of colonised patients had been admitted to a hospital within the previous one year, and the high prevalence of previous hospitalisation among people from institutional care may explain the higher rates of MRSA carriage among these individuals. When a patient gives a history of hospitalisation within the previous year, it is clearly sensible to consider the use of an agent such as teicoplanin for perioperative prophylaxis.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Fraturas do Quadril/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Admissão do Paciente , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Teicoplanina/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...