Leon J. Kamin (1927-2017).

Presents an obituary of Leon J. Kamin (1927-2017), former chair of the Psychology Department at Northeastern University. Over the course of his career, Kamin demonstrated a rare combination of skills as a researcher, scholar, and administrator. Early in his career, Kamin developed an influential line of research on conditioning. In fact, a conditioning effect, the Kamin (blocking) effect, is named after him. Later in his career, he became interested in the heritability of intelligence, leading to his debunking of Cyril Burt's famous twin studies and the publication of his extremely influential book The Science and Politics of IQ (1974). Kamin also enjoyed great success as an administrator, serving as chair in each of the departments in which he worked. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

The effect of stereotype threat on performance of a rhythmic motor skill.

Many studies using cognitive tasks have found that stereotype threat, or concern about confirming a negative stereotype about one's group, debilitates performance. The few studies that documented similar effects on sensorimotor performance have used only relatively coarse measures to quantify performance. This study tested the effect of stereotype threat on a rhythmic ball bouncing task, where previous analyses of the task dynamics afforded more detailed quantification of the effect of threat on motor control. In this task, novices hit the ball with positive racket acceleration, indicative of unstable performance. With practice, they learn to stabilize error by changing their ball-racket impact from positive to negative acceleration. Results showed that for novices, stereotype threat potentiated hitting the ball with positive racket acceleration, leading to poorer performance of stigmatized females. However, when the threat manipulation was delivered after having acquired some skill, reflected by negative racket acceleration, the stigmatized females performed better. These findings are consistent with the mere effort account that argues that stereotype threat potentiates the most likely response on the given task. The study also demonstrates the value of identifying the control mechanisms through which stereotype threat has its effects on outcome measures.

The intervening task method: implications for measuring mediation.

To study mediation, investigators sometimes examine the effect of an independent variable on an unrelated filler task that precedes the focal task. This approach assumes that the same psychological process drives performance on both tasks. The authors tested this assumption in a stereotype threat paradigm by manipulating whether or not the intervening task was described as relevant to the gender-math stereotype. When performance was relevant to the stereotype, females outperformed controls on an intervening Stroop task, but not when it was irrelevant (Experiment 1). In fact, females anticipating taking a math test under threat withdrew effort and performed more poorly on the intervening task when performance was irrelevant (Experiment 2). These findings suggest that different processes may drive performance on irrelevant and relevant intervening tasks. As a result, performance on irrelevant filler tasks may actually tell scholars little about mediating mechanisms.

Need threat can motivate performance after ostracism.

Ostracism threatens fundamental needs of belonging, self-esteem, control, and meaningful existence, which should motivate participants to respond to this threat. However, research has yet to examine the role of need threat in producing motivation after ostracism. In the current work, participants completed a "cognitive ability" (antisaccade) task following Cyberball-induced ostracism or inclusion. In two experiments, it was found that when ostracized, participants do not see antisaccade performance as a means of responding to the concerns produced by need threat; they respond only to the social threat, leading to worse performance than included participants (Experiments 1 and 2). However, when participants see an avenue of response (the Cyberball players can compare antisaccade performances), ostracized participants outperform included participants (Experiment 2). Moreover, this effect was mediated by the need for belonging, suggesting that ostracized participants were motivated to elevate their inclusionary status by demonstrating their worth on the cognitive ability task.

The effect of stereotype threat on the solving of quantitative GRE problems: a mere effort interpretation.

The mere effort account argues that stereotype threat motivates participants to want to perform well, which potentiates prepotent responses. If the prepotent response is correct, performance is facilitated. If incorrect and participants do not know, or lack the knowledge or time required for correction, performance is debilitated. The Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) quantitative test is made up of two problem types: (a) solve problems, which require the solution of an equation, and (b) comparison problems, which require the use of logic and estimation. Previous research shows that the prepotent tendency is to attempt to solve the equations. Consistent with mere effort predictions, Experiment 1 demonstrates that threatened participants perform better than controls on solve problems (prepotent response correct) but worse than controls on comparison problems (prepotent response incorrect). Experiment 2 shows that a simple instruction as to the correct solution approach eliminates the performance deficit on comparison problems.

Testing the mere effort account of the evaluation-performance relationship.

Research traditions in psychology in which the evaluation-performance relationship was examined do not show agreement on the mediating process, nor is there any compelling evidence that favors one account over the others. On the basis of a molecular analysis of performance on the Remote Associates Test (RAT), Harkins (2006) argued that the potential for evaluation motivates participants to perform well, which potentiates prepotent responses. If the prepotent response is correct, performance is facilitated. If the prepotent response is incorrect, and participants do not know, or if they lack the knowledge or time required for correction, performance is debilitated. The present research pits this mere effort account against 4 other potential explanations (withdrawal of effort, processing interference, focus of attention, and drive) on 3 tasks that were specifically selected for this purpose (anagram solution, the Stroop Color-Word task, and the antisaccade task). In each case, the results are consistent with the mere effort account.

Mere effort and stereotype threat performance effects.

Although the fact that stereotype threat impacts performance is well established, the underlying process(es) is(are) not clear. Recently, T. Schmader and M. Johns (2003) argued for a working memory interference account, which proposes that performance suffers because cognitive resources are expended on processing information associated with negative stereotypes. The antisaccade task provides a vehicle to test this account because optimal performance requires working memory resources to inhibit the tendency to look at an irrelevant, peripheral cue (the prepotent response) and to generate volitional saccades to the target. If stereotype threat occupies working memory resources, then the ability to inhibit the prepotent response and to launch volitional saccades will be impaired, and performance will suffer. In contrast, S. Harkins's (2006) mere effort account argues that stereotype threat participants are motivated to perform well, which potentiates the prepotent response, but also leads to efforts to counter this tendency if participants recognize that the response is incorrect, know the correct response, and have the opportunity to make it. Results from 4 experiments support the mere effort but not the working memory interference account.

Mere effort as the mediator of the evaluation-performance relationship.

The research traditions that have examined the evaluation-performance relationship do not agree on the mediating process(es), nor is there any compelling evidence that favors one account over the others. In the current research, a molecular analysis of performance on the Remote Associates Test was undertaken in an effort to identify the mediating process(es). This analysis suggests that the potential for evaluation leads participants to put greater effort into the prepotent response and that this mere effort alone can account for the typical finding that evaluation improves performance on simple items and debilitates performance on complex ones. Subsequent research will be aimed at testing the generalizability of this account.

Multifactorial comparison of disk displacement with and without reduction to normals according to temporomandibular joint hard tissue anatomic relationships.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: There is disagreement about the predictive value of temporomandibular joint tomographic anatomy in the diagnosis of internal derangements. PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify multifactorial temporomandibular hard tissue relationships that differentiate disk displacement with reduction and disk displacement without reduction from normals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Temporomandibular joint tomograms from females diagnosed with unilateral disk displacement with (n=84) or without (n=78) reduction were compared to 42 asymptomatic normal joints with the use of 14 linear and angular measurements and 8 ratios. A validated classification tree model was tested for accuracy with sensitivity, specificity, goodness of fit, and the amount of log likelihood accounted for. The tree model was compared with a multiple logistic regression model and univariate testing. RESULTS: The disk displacement with reduction tree model consisted of 3 disease and 2 normal pathways with interactions between fossa width to depth ratio, condyle position, and linear posterior joint space. This class was characterized by either a much wider- and shallower-than-average fossa shape and/or by a moderately posterior condyle position when the fossa shape was average to deeper and/or narrower. The logistic regression and univariate models also suggested wider and/or shallower fossae, as well as longer eminence length. The disk displacement without reduction tree model consisted of 2 disease pathways and 1 normal pathway. Interactions characterized this class by either a posterior to very posterior condyle position or by a much deeper than average fossa depth when the condyle position was concentric to anterior. The logistic regression model emphasized greater fossa depth and width versus normals. The tree models conservatively predicted the disease classes: Rescaled Cox and Snell R(2) 37.0%, sensitivity 70.2%, and specificity 90.5% for disk displacement with reduction; R(2) 28.8%, sensitivity 66.7%, and specificity 85.7% for disk displacement without reduction. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, hard tissue relationships revealed by central tomogram sections were able to model notable differences between disk displacement with reduction and disk displacement without reduction versus asymptomatic normals when temporomandibular joints were examined as a multifactorial system typified by interactions of fossa width to depth proportions and condyle position. While substantial, the hard tissue predicted only part of the biology. The model could be broadened by additional factors and interactions.

Multifactorial modeling of temporomandibular anatomic and orthopedic relationships in normal versus undifferentiated disk displacement joints.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: There is persistent dispute about the diagnostic value of hard tissue anatomic relationships in predicting temporomandibular joint disorders and normals. PURPOSE: The goal of this study was identification of multifactorial temporomandibular hard tissue relationships that differentiate asymptomatic normal joints. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Central section lateral tomograms of 162 female temporomandibular joints with pooled diagnoses of unilateral disk displacement with and without reduction were compared to 42 female asymptomatic normal joints using 14 linear and angular measurements and 8 ratios. A validated classification tree model was tested for accuracy with sensitivity, specificity, goodness of fit, and the amount of the log likelihood accounted for. The tree model was compared with a multiple logistic regression model and univariate testing. RESULTS: The classification tree model consisted of 3 asymptomatic and 4 disk displacement terminal nodes consisting of interactions of condyle position with measures of fossa size and shape, of which mainly average non-extreme measurements and more frequent concentric ranges typified the asymptomatic joints. The logistic regression and univariate models also incorporated condyle position and size, but the logistic regression accounted for less of the log likelihood than the tree (23.3% vs. 32.6% Rescaled Cox and Snell R(2)). The tree and the logistic regression models were moderately good predictors for distinguishing normals from disk displacement joints (sensitivity 67.9% and 72.2%, specificity 85.7% and 76.2%, respectively). Although the univariate analysis showed that the asymptomatic joints had smaller mean fossa width to fossa depth ratios (P<.0005), shorter mean eminence length (P<.007), and more concentric to anterior mean condyle position (P<.049), overlap in most of the ranges limited the predictive value. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, multifactorial analysis revealed that several subsets of asymptomatic temporomandibular joints could be distinguished from joints with disk displacement according to hard tissue measurements taken from central section tomograms. In general, asymptomatic normal joints were typified by interactions of less extreme ranges of fossa size, shape, and condyle position.

A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales.

Numerical rating scales and mechanical visual analogue scales (M-VAS) were compared for their capacity to provide ratio scale measures of experimental pain. Separate estimates of experimental pain sensation intensity and pain unpleasantness were obtained by each method, as were estimates of clinical pain. Orofacial pain patients made numerical scale and VAS ratings in response to noxious thermal stimuli (45-51 degrees C) applied for 5 sec to the forearm by a contact thermode. The derived stimulus-response function was well fit as a power function only in the case of sensory M-VAS. The power function derived from sensory M-VAS ratings predicted temperatures chosen as twice as intense as standard temperatures of 47 degrees C and 48 degrees C, thereby providing evidence for ratio scale characteristics of M-VAS. The stimulus-response function derived from sensory numerical ratings differed from that obtained with M-VAS and did not provide accurate predictions of temperatures perceived as twice intense at 47 degrees C or 48 degrees C. Both M-VAS and numerical rating scales produced reliably different stimulus response functions for pain sensation intensity as compared to pain unpleasantness and both provided consistent measures of experimental and clinical pain intensity. Finally, both mechanical and pencil-and-paper VAS produced very similar stimulus-response functions. The ratio scale properties of M-VAS combined with its ease of administration and scoring in clinical settings offer the possibility of a simple yet powerful pain measurement technology in both research and health care settings.

Analysis of gender effects on pain perception and symptom presentation in temporomandibular pain.

Based on clinical populations, chronic orofacial pain of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) occurs more frequently (range: 2:1 to 9:1) in women than men. The reasons for this difference are not clear. The present study evaluated symptom presentation, sensitivity to pain, personality, and illness behavior in 2 samples of patients suffering with orofacial pain. Also, pain responses were studied in pain-free volunteers, controlling for experimenter-gender effects. The results showed few gender differences based on ratings of chronic or experimental pain, pain-related illness behavior, and personality. The higher ratio of women versus men seeking TMD care is consistent with greater health awareness or interest in symptoms by women than by men.

Effects of extraversion and neuroticism on experimental pain, clinical pain, and illness behavior.

The effects of 2 personality traits, extraversion and neuroticism, on experimental and clinical pain were characterized in a group of myofascial pain dysfunction (MPD) patients. Extraverts did not differ from introverts in visual analogue scale (VAS) sensory or VAS affective ratings of graded 5-sec nociceptive temperature stimuli (43-51 degrees C) nor in VAS sensory-VAS affective relationships related to their clinical pain. However, high extravert patients scored lower on affective inhibition (Pilowsky Illness Behavior Questionnaire; IBQ) compared to low extravert patients. This result is consistent with previous suggestions that extraverts inhibit overt expressions of suffering less than do introverts. High neurotic patients did not differ from low neurotic patients in their VAS sensory ratings of either experimental or clinical pain. Their VAS affective ratings of both types of pain were marginally higher as compared to low neurotic patients. As hypothesized, high neurotic score patients gave higher VAS ratings of emotions related to suffering and scored higher on items related to affective disturbance on the IBQ as compared to low neurotic score patients. Overall, the results indicate that the personality traits of neither extraversion nor neuroticism affect sensory mechanisms of nociceptive processing but appear to exert their influence by means of cognitive processes related to the ways in which people constitute the meanings and implications of pain.

Evaluation and Performance: A Two-Edged Knife.

Social loafing research has shown that participants working together put out less effort than participants working individually (Latane, Williams, & Harkins, 1979), apparently a result of the fact that evaluation is not possible when outputs are pooled (Harkins & Jackson, 1985). On the other hand, research on creativity (e.g., Amabile, 1979), suggests that minimizing the expectation of evaluation facilitates performance. In the present study, treatment conditions typically used in social loafing and creativity research were incorporated in a single design. Participants were asked either to generate as many uses as possible for a common object or to generate uses that were as creative as possible. Participants were also led to believe either that their outputs could be evaluated or that their outputs would be pooled with those of others. The performance of participants given number instructions was facilitated by the prospect of evaluation. However, when asked to be creative, participants whose outputs were pooled performed better than participants whose outputs could be evaluated. These data suggest that on tasks that require creativity, conditions that are thought to lead to "loafing" can have the opposite effect.

A simultaneous comparison of fentanyl's analgesic effects on experimental and clinical pain.

Intravenous administration of 0.8 microgram/kg and 1.1 micrograms/kg fentanyl in low back pain patients reduced both sensory intensity and unpleasantness visual analogue scale (VAS) responses to experimental pain evoked by graded 5-sec nociceptive temperature stimuli (45-51 degrees C) as well as VAS-sensory and VAS-affective responses to clinical pain. Fentanyl produced similar decreases in VAS-sensory responses to experimental and clinical pain. Fentanyl produced nearly equal reductions in VAS-sensory and VAS-affective responses to experimental pain but greater reductions in clinical pain VAS-affective as compared to clinical pain VAS-sensory responses. This interaction of type of pain (experimental versus clinical) and pain dimension (sensory versus affective) results from either a steeper sensory intensity-unpleasantness relationship for clinical pain as compared to experimental pain or additional selective influences of opiates on affective factors uniquely related to clinical pain. These results indicate that low to moderate doses of opiates reduce both sensory and affective dimensions of pain and strongly suggest that changes in pain affect occur mainly as a direct consequence of reductions in pain sensation intensity.

Brain evoked potentials are functional correlates of induced pain in man.

Electrical potentials evoked by 5 intensities of painful dental stimulation were recorded at the scalp. During testing, volunteers indicated subjective painfulness by verbal pain ratings and visual analogue scales. Evoked potentials (EPs) to each intensity, observed between 50 and 400 msec, were characterized by 4 waveform components. The peak-to-peak amplitudes, but not the peak latencies, of all 4 EP components systematically increased with increased stimulation. The amplitudes of the two earlier components correlated with stimulus intensity when the effect of subjective painfulness was controlled, but this was not the case for the later components. In contrast, the amplitudes of the two later components were associated with subjective painfulness but not with stimulus intensity. A strong linear relationship was observed between subjective painfulness and peak-to-peak amplitude for the EP component observed between 175 and 260 msec. The data suggest that the earlier EP components may reflect sensory transmission processes while the later components indicate brain activity when pain is perceived.

Detection and decision factors in pain perception in young and elderly men.

The effect of age on ability to discriminate between levels of electrical stimulation of tooth pulp and willingness to report shocks as painful was evaluated using the Sensory Decision Theory. While threshold did not increase with age for tooth pulp stimulation as is often observed for thermal pain thresholds, a significant age deficit in ability to discriminate between suprathreshold shocks was observed. Significant changes with age in willingness to report the electrical shocks as painful were also observed. These results indicate that changes with age in pain perception are complex, involving not only possible discrimination deficits but also changes in bias for and against labeling noxious events as painful. These findings stress the need for within individual comparisons of laboratory techniques for evoking acute pain experiences where variables such as age are under consideration.