Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 18(5): e629-e642, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32178978

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested increased clinical benefit with inhibition of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed death-1 in patients with PD-L1-positive locally advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined the analytical and inter-observer comparability of PD-L1-positivity across 4 clinically developed immunohistochemistry assays in clear-cell RCC (CCRCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomly selected archived, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded nephrectomy specimens from 201 patients with locally advanced CCRCC were screened using VENTANA SP142. From these, 30 cases were selected based on their tumor-infiltrating immune cell (IC) PD-L1 status (PD-L1-IC-positivity of < 1%, 1%-5%, or > 5%; 10 cases each). These cases were stained for PD-L1 using VENTANA SP142 and SP263, and DAKO 22C3 and 28-8, and scored for PD-L1 expression on IC and tumor cells (TC) by trained readers at 5 sites. RESULTS: Adjusted mean percentages of PD-L1-IC-positivity and PD-L1-TC-positivity varied from 4.0% to 4.9% and from 1.3% to 10.7%, respectively, between assays. Inter-assay differences in PD-L1-IC-positivity were small and non-significant (P = .1938 to .9963); for PD-L1-TC-positivity, significant differences were observed between VENTANA SP142 and the other assays (P ≤ .0001) and between VENTANA SP263 and DAKO 28-8 (P = .0248). Intra-class correlation values showed moderate-to-high inter-reader agreement for each assay for PD-L1-IC-positivity and for 3 assays for PD-L1-TC-positivity. CONCLUSIONS: In this first multicenter analytical comparison study of PD-L1 assays in CCRCC, PD-L1-positivity could be assessed reproducibly using all 4 assays for IC and for 3 of the 4 assays for TC.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Antígeno B7-H1 , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica
2.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 178(2): 451-458, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31422497

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Ki-67 labeling index assessed by immunohistochemical assays has been shown useful in assessing the risk of recurrence for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive HER2-negative breast cancers (BC) and distinguishing Luminal A-like from Luminal B-like tumors. We aimed to assess the performance of the Ventana CONFIRM anti-Ki-67 (30-9) Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody. METHODS: We constructed a case-cohort design based on a random sample (n = 679) of all patients operated on for a first primary, non-metastatic, ER-positive, HER2-negative BC at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO) Milan, Italy during 1998-2002 and all additional patients (n = 303) operated during the same period, who developed an event (metastasis in distant organs or death due to BC as primary event) and were not included in the previous subset. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with inverse subcohort sampling probability weighting was used to evaluate the risk of event according to Ki-67 (30-9) and derived intrinsic molecular subtype, using previously defined cutoff values, i.e., respectively 14% and 20%. RESULTS: Ki-67 was < 14% in 318 patients (32.4%), comprised between 14 and 19% in 245 patients (24.9%) and ≥ 20 in 419 patients (42.7%). At multivariable analysis, the risk of developing distant disease was 1.88 (95% CI 1.20-2.93; P = 0.006) for those with Ki-67 comprised between 14 and 19%, and 3.06 (95% CI 1.93-4.84; P < 0.0001) for those with Ki-67 ≥ 20% compared to those with Ki-67 < 14%. Patients with Luminal B-like BC had an approximate twofold risk of developing distant disease (HR = 1.91; 95% CI 1.35-2.71; P = 0.0003) than patients with Luminal A-like BC defined using Ki-67 (30-9). CONCLUSIONS: Ki-67 evaluation using the 30-9 rabbit monoclonal primary antibody was able to stratify patients with ER-positive HER2-negative BC into prognostically distinct groups. Ki-67 assessment, with strict adherence to the international recommendations, should be included among the clinically useful biological parameters for the best treatment of patients with BC.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/etiologia , Diferenciação Celular , Antígeno Ki-67/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais
3.
Mod Pathol ; 32(11): 1574-1586, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31231125

RESUMO

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and additional biomarkers for individually predicting patient outcomes are needed. Aberrant membrane E-cadherin immunoexpression has been demonstrated in lobular breast cancer. Also, E-cadherin nuclear staining has been reported, associating with prognosis in various tumors. Here, we explore whether membrane or nuclear staining of E-cadherin has the potential to dictate prognosis of patients with lobular breast cancer. We selected a cohort of 285 consecutively diagnosed lobular breast cancer patients and performed immunohistochemistry for E-cadherin (clones 36, EP700Y, and NCH38) and P-cadherin (clone 56C1) in representative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks. All patients were female, HER2-negative and surgically treated in a single institution. Survival curves were computed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Hazard ratios and respective 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Cox regression models. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Nuclear staining for E-cadherin clone 36 was frequent (35%), contrarily to other antibodies tested. Negative correlation was found between nuclear and membrane E-cadherin clone 36 immunostaining (rs = -0.30, p < 0.001), whereas positive correlation was found between membrane immunoexpression of E-cadherin clone 36 and P-cadherin (rs = 0.31, p < 0.001). Patients with any evidence of E-cadherin clone 36 nuclear immunostaining disclosed significantly worse overall survival, disease-specific-survival and disease/progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 2.059, 95% confidence interval 1.313-3.230; hazard ratio = 1.980, 95% confidence interval 1.121-3.495; and hazard ratio = 2.341, 95% confidence interval 1.403-3.905, respectively). Differences in survival were more remarkable when considering nuclear E-cadherin immunoexpression in ≥50% tumor cells. Poorer survival was maintained in multivariable analysis, after adjusting for age, menopausal and PR status, treatment course, vascular invasion, tumor grade and stage. Our results support the use of antibodies against the cytoplasmic domain of E-cadherin, such as clone 36, which may reveal nuclear immunostaining and indicate more aggressive clinical course in patients with lobular breast cancer. We hypothesize that E-cadherin is cleaved and translocated to nucleus functioning as transcription factor.


Assuntos
Antígenos CD/análise , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Caderinas/análise , Carcinoma Lobular/patologia , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Carcinoma Lobular/mortalidade , Núcleo Celular/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...