National survey of physicians' perception of the cause, complications, and management of gastroparesis.

OBJECTIVES: Manifestations of gastroparesis are heterogeneous and clinical complications are poorly defined. Misconceptions of gastroparesis may be common. The objective was to determine physicians' perception of gastroparesis and identify areas that need further research and education. METHODS: A physician survey was prospectively developed and tested. The survey included questions on the etiology, symptoms, management and perceived complications of gastroparesis. Physicians' feedback included rated responses by Likert scale and ranked responses by priority. A total of 3658 surveys were mailed to gastroenterologists and general practitioners using an online physician directory and a local medical society directory. Analysis of variance and t test were utilized. RESULTS: A total of 397 surveys were returned. 85.9% of responses were from the national survey and 14.1% were local. Physicians ranked diabetes (70%) as the most common cause of gastroparesis, followed by idiopathic (21%) and postsurgical (9%). Postprandial epigastric pain (61%) was ranked as the most frequent symptom of gastroparesis, followed by retching/vomiting (20%) and heartburn/regurgitation (19%). 60% believed scintigraphy t1/2 is an accurate measurement of gastric emptying. Only one-third believed gastric electrical stimulation was effective as treatment of gastroparesis. Physicians rated abdominal pain as the most clinically significant complication of gastroparesis surpassing weight loss, hospitalization for dehydration, and malnutrition (P < 0.01). There were small but statistically significant differences between gastroenterologists versus general practitioners and private versus academic physicians. CONCLUSION: More physician awareness and education is needed on gastroparesis and the standardized four-hour gastric scintigraphy method, as well to clarify the management strategy for this condition.

A novel classification scheme for gastroparesis based on predominant-symptom presentation.

AIM: Symptoms of gastroparesis are very diverse. Classifying patients by predominant symptom may improve management strategy. GOAL: To validate a new symptom-predominant classification for gastroparesis using symptom severity and quality-of-life measures. STUDY: Subjects with gastroparesis for >2 months were prospectively enrolled. A physician classified each subject into one of the following: vomiting-predominant, dyspepsia-predominant, or regurgitation-predominant gastroparesis. Subjects also classified themselves independently from the physician. Each subject completed a Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) and SF-12v2 Health-Related Quality-Of-Life survey. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed with sensitivity and specificity of each PAGI-SYM subscale to differentiate subjects into symptom-predominant subgroups. Area under the curve (AUC) was used to compare the receiver operating characteristic curves. Analysis of variance, Cohen's kappa (kappa) statistic, student t test, and Pearson correlation (r) were used. RESULTS: One hundred subjects (87 females, mean 48 y) were enrolled. There was a 78% concordance between physician and subject's classification of gastroparesis with substantial correlation (kappa=0.64). PAGI-SYM nausea/vomiting subscale (AUC=0.79) and PAGI-SYM heartburn/regurgitation subscale (AUC=0.73) were the best in differentiating subjects into vomiting-predominant and regurgitation-predominant gastroparesis, respectively. No subscale was adequate to differentiate dyspepsia-predominant gastroparesis. SF-12v2 total scores significantly correlated with worsening of the total PAGI-SYM scores (r=-0.339 to -0.600, all P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There was a substantial agreement between physician and patient using a symptom-predominant gastroparesis classification. Results suggest that a predominant-symptom classification is a valid means to categorize subjects with vomiting-predominant and regurgitation-predominant gastroparesis. Patients with dyspepsia and delayed gastric emptying need further research.

Exclusion of pH artifacts is essential for hypopharyngeal pH monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Published yields of pH monitoring for suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) vary greatly. Hypopharyngeal pH artifacts may be responsible for these inconsistencies. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of potential artifacts on pH monitoring of the hypopharynx and esophagus. METHODS: Patients with suspected LPR were prospectively studied. Single-catheter, triple-sensor pH monitoring was performed off antireflux therapy. Subjects recorded meal times and marked liquid swallows outside of meals on the data recorder. Results were analyzed by excluding six potential pH artifacts individually and all together. Positive pH test was defined as three or more reflux episodes in hypopharynx, total percent of time pH less than 4 was 1.0% or greater in the proximal esophagus, and total percent of time pH less than 4 was 4.2% or greater in the distal esophagus. Wilcoxon rank sum and chi-square tests were used. RESULTS: Thirty-eight subjects (24 females; median age, 47 yr) completed the study. A total of 2,225 hypopharyngeal pH drops less than 4 were identified; 48% were short pH drops at less than 5 seconds, 17% within meal periods, 16% liquid swallows outside of meals, 16% isolated proximal pH drops, 12% pH out of range, and 5% pH drift. Eighty percent of the hypopharyngeal pH drops were at least one of the potential pH artifacts. The yield of the hypopharyngeal sensor was reduced by 45% (from 92% to 47%) after all potential pH artifacts were excluded. Yields of proximal and distal esophageal pH sensors were reduced by 19% and 8%, respectively, significantly less than the hypopharyngeal sensor (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients should record all liquid swallows outside of meals. It is essential to exclude all potential artifacts for hypopharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with suspected LPR.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with single-dose pantoprazole for laryngopharyngeal reflux.

OBJECTIVES: Results of randomized treatment trials for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are mixed. The cause and effect between gastroesophageal reflux and laryngeal symptoms remain elusive. AIMS: To determine the efficacy of single-dose pantoprazole in newly diagnosed LPR and to correlate hypopharyngeal reflux with symptom improvement. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed with a 2-wk run-in, 12-wk treatment period (pantoprazole 40 mg q.a.m. or placebo), and 4-wk follow-up. Study criteria were laryngeal complaints >3 days/wk and a positive triple-sensor pH test. Laryngeal exam was graded using a reflux finding score before and after treatment. Repeat pH test was performed on study drug at week 12. Weekly diaries were kept on symptom severity and global assessment. Total laryngeal symptom score was defined as the sum of six laryngeal symptoms. Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, and Pearson tests were used. RESULTS: Thirty-nine subjects (13 M/26 F, median age 39 yr) were randomized; 35 completed the study. During the treatment period, total laryngeal symptom scores significantly improved compared with pretreatment scores in both study groups, but there were no significant differences between them. Forty percent of pantoprazole group reported adequate relief at week 12, compared with 42% of placebo group (p= 0.89). No significant improvement in hypopharyngeal reflux was found in either study group. There were no significant correlations between laryngeal reflux finding scores and hypopharyngeal reflux episodes with symptom improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Response was similar between single-dose pantoprazole and placebo in newly diagnosed LPR. Our results suggested that laryngeal exam was not useful in following treatment response. Hypopharyngeal reflux may represent acid reflux or artifacts, but is not likely the underlying cause.

Diagnosis and management of adult patients with chronic intestinal pseudoobstruction.

Chronic intestinal pseudoobstruction (CIP) is a motility syndrome that presents with symptoms and signs of intestinal obstruction and radiographic evidence of dilated bowels, but no anatomic obstruction can be found. It primarily is a disorder of small bowel motility, but it can occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract. This review will focus on the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with CIP. The clinical presentation of CIP is variable, and its incidence is rare. It is a disorder with a multitude of etiologies, many of which are poorly understood. To properly manage the patient, clinicians should be aware of the various symptoms, signs, and systemic diseases that are associated with CIP. Diagnostic studies are needed to confirm the diagnosis, identify the etiology, and search for coexisting motility dysfunction. The management goals of CIP are to restore proper nutrition and fluid balance, relieve symptoms, improve intestinal motility, and treat complications.