Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(5): 136-138, 2017 Feb 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28182599

RESUMO

In October 2016, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted to approve the Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older-United States, 2017. The 2017 adult immunization schedule summarizes ACIP recommendations in two figures, footnotes for the figures, and a table of contraindications and precautions for vaccines recommended for adults. These documents are available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules. The full ACIP recommendations for each vaccine can be found at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/index.html. The 2017 adult immunization schedule was also reviewed and approved by the American College of Physicians (https://www.acponline.org), the American Academy of Family Physicians (https://www.aafp.org), the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (http://www.acog.org), and the American College of Nurse-Midwives (http://www.midwife.org).


Assuntos
Esquemas de Imunização , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Vacinação/normas , Vacinas/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Comitês Consultivos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(4): 88-90, 2016 Feb 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26845417

RESUMO

In October 2015, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)* approved the Recommended Immunization Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older, United States, 2016. This schedule provides a summary of ACIP recommendations for the use of vaccines routinely recommended for adults aged 19 years or older in two figures, footnotes for each vaccine, and a table that describes primary contraindications and precautions for commonly used vaccines for adults. Although the figures in the adult immunization schedule illustrate recommended vaccinations that begin at age 19 years, the footnotes contain information on vaccines that are recommended for adults that may begin at age younger than age 19 years. The footnotes also contain vaccine dosing, intervals between doses, and other important information and should be read with the figures.


Assuntos
Esquemas de Imunização , Imunização/normas , Vacinas/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Comitês Consultivos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos
5.
J Adolesc Health ; 58(2): 241-4, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26802995

RESUMO

PURPOSE: During recent pertussis epidemics, adolescents have experienced a large burden of disease. We assessed the impact of pertussis among San Diego adolescents and their households. METHODS: Parents of pertussis patients aged 13-17 years were surveyed about health care utilization, missed work and school, and other factors. Costs of medical visits, medication use, and lost wages were estimated. RESULTS: The parents of 53 (of 108 [49%]) eligible 2013 pertussis patients were interviewed; 51 (96%) of these patients previously received tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine. Medical visits included primary care (81%), urgent care (11%), and emergency department (9%); all patients received antibiotics. Forty-seven households (89%) received a post-exposure prophylaxis recommendation, and five (9%) reported ≥1 unpaid parental leave day. Thirty-eight patients (72%) missed ≥1 school day (mean = 5.4 days). Societal costs were estimated at $315.15 per household and $236,047.35 in San Diego during 2013-2014. CONCLUSIONS: Even among vaccinated adolescents, pertussis can result in considerable societal costs.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Coqueluche , Absenteísmo , Adolescente , California , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Masculino , Vacinação/economia , Coqueluche/economia
6.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(4): 91-2, 2015 Feb 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25654609

RESUMO

In October 2014, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) approved the Recommended Immunization Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older, United States, 2015. This schedule provides a summary of ACIP recommendations for the use of vaccines routinely recommended for adults aged 19 years or older in two figures, footnotes for each vaccine, and a table that describes primary contraindications and precautions for commonly used vaccines for adults. Changes in the 2015 adult immunization schedule from the 2014 schedule included the August 2014 recommendation for routine administration of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in series with the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) for all adults aged 65 years or older, the August 2014 revision on contraindications and precautions for the live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), and the October 2014 approval by the Food and Drug Administration to expand the approved age for use of recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV). These revisions were also reviewed and approved by the American College of Physicians, American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and American College of Nurse-Midwives.


Assuntos
Esquemas de Imunização , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adulto , Comitês Consultivos , Idoso , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem
7.
J Correct Health Care ; 20(4): 292-301, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25201912

RESUMO

This article describes the epidemiology of varicella in one state prison in California during 2010 and 2011, control measures implemented, and associated costs. Eleven varicella cases were reported, of which nine were associated with two outbreaks. One outbreak consisted of three cases and the second consisted of six cases with two generations of spread. Among exposed inmates serologically tested, 98% (643/656) were varicella-zoster virus seropositive. The outbreaks resulted in > 1,000 inmates exposed, 444 staff exposures, and > $160,000 in costs. The authors documented the challenges and costs associated with controlling and managing varicella in a prison setting. A screening policy for evidence of varicella immunity for incoming inmates and staff and vaccination of susceptible persons has the potential to mitigate the impact of future outbreaks and reduce resources necessary to manage cases and outbreaks.


Assuntos
Varicela/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Prisões/organização & administração , Prisões/estatística & dados numéricos , California/epidemiologia , Varicela/economia , Varicela/transmissão , Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Custos e Análise de Custo , Surtos de Doenças/economia , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/economia , Programas de Rastreamento , Prisões/economia
9.
Public Health Rep ; 124(3): 427-35, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19445419

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In 2000, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) implemented active, sentinel site surveillance for community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). Data from 2000-2005 were analyzed to determine trends in case characteristics, pulsed-field types (PFTs), and antimicrobial susceptibilities including inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR). METHODS: Active sentinel site surveillance was initiated in 2000 at 12 hospital laboratories that served inpatients and outpatients. Patient medical records were reviewed to determine if they met the epidemiologic case criteria for CA-MRSA; isolates were obtained from patients meeting these criteria. The MDH Public Health Laboratory performed pulsed-field gel electrophoresis subtyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, including ICR. RESULTS: The proportion of MRSA cases classified as CA increased from 11% to 33% (p<0.01). The proportion of cases with skin or soft tissue infections also increased compared with other infection types from 75% to 87% (p<0.01). During the surveillance period, USA300 replaced USA400 as the dominant PFT. With the change in dominant PFT, the proportion of isolates susceptible to erythromycin (45% to 13%, p<0.01) and ciprofloxacin (80% to 59%, p<0.01) decreased. The proportion of erythromycin-resistant/clindamycin-susceptible isolates with ICR (93% to 14%, p<0.01) decreased. The proportion of susceptible isolates also changed within the USA300 PFT; the proportion of isolates susceptible to erythromycin (33% vs. 3%) and the proportion susceptible to ciprofloxacin (67% to 62%) decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: CA-MRSA increased dramatically from 2000 to 2005. Changes in the predominant PFT have impacted susceptibility profiles of CA-MRSA, including ICR. Continued surveillance is needed to monitor the changing epidemiology of CA-MRSA and to inform clinical decisions.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Resistência a Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Criança , Ciprofloxacina/farmacologia , Clindamicina/farmacologia , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Eritromicina/farmacologia , Humanos , Vigilância da População , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 11(10): 1532-8, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16318692

RESUMO

We compared characteristics of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) and CA-MRSA invasive disease identified in Minnesota from 2000 through 2003. A total of 586 patients with SSTIs and 65 patients with invasive disease were identified. Patients with invasive disease were more likely to be smokers (p = 0.03), and report a history of immunosuppressive therapy (p = 0.03), emphysema (p = 0.011), or injection drug use (p = 0.020) than were SSTI patients. Invasive disease isolates were less likely to be susceptible to ciprofloxacin (p = 0.002) and clindamycin (p = 0.001) and more likely to have healthcare-associated pulsed-field gel electrophoresis subtypes than SSTI isolates (p<0.001). Patients with invasive disease may have had healthcare exposures that put them at risk of acquiring healthcare-associated MRSA and which were not exclusion criteria in the CA-MRSA case definition. Continued surveillance of MRSA is needed to better characterize CA-MRSA infections.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Resistência a Meticilina , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Minnesota/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/microbiologia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/fisiopatologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/fisiopatologia , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/fisiopatologia , Staphylococcus aureus/classificação , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...