A Clinical-Community Partnership to Address Food Insecurity and Reduce Emergency Department Utilization Among Medicaid-Insured Patients in North Carolina.

CONTEXT: Socioeconomic risk factors have the greatest impact on overall health trajectory. Patients with Medicaid insurance are more likely to experience food insecurity, in addition to poor health and increased health care utilization. Targeted food and produce prescription programs can reduce food insecurity, but sustainable implementation is challenging and evidence demonstrating the impact on clinical utilization outcomes is lacking. PROGRAM: In 2021, a cross-sector collaboration between Mecklenburg County Public Health, Reinvestment Partners, and Atrium Health initiated a food prescription program in urban North Carolina. A low-cost mass text message campaign was used to identify and enroll Medicaid-insured patients with a history of emergency department (ED) utilization. METHODS: A nonrandomized before/after evaluation design was used with a 12-month data collection window (6 months before/after program enrollment) for 711 patients enrolled between June 2021 and 2022. Changes in the odds of nonadmission ED utilization were modeled using logistic regression, adjusting for race/ethnicity, gender, age, comorbidity, and dose, along with interaction by comorbidity. RESULTS: A majority of the sample was non-Hispanic Black (61%; n = 436), female (90%; n = 643), with "none to mild" chronic disease comorbidity (81%; n = 573). The unadjusted and adjusted odds of nonadmission ED utilization significantly reduced between time periods, along with significant interaction by comorbidity. Among the subsamples, patients with "none to mild" comorbidity showed 34% reduction in odds of nonadmission ED utilization (OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.86). DISCUSSION: Food prescription programming targeting Medicaid-insured patients may reduce ED utilization, particularly among those without severe comorbidity. Retrospective data collection and sample homogeneity reduced the quality of evidence, but results offer a pragmatic example that can be replicated for further study. Additional research is needed to strengthen the body of evidence and support cross-sector investment in food and produce prescription programming.

Engaging Religious Institutions to Address Racial Disparities in HIV/AIDS: A Case of Academic-Community Partnership.

African Americans face the most severe burden of HIV among all racial and ethnic groups. Direct involvement of faith leaders and faith communities is increasingly suggested as a primary strategy to reduce HIV-related disparities, and Black churches are uniquely positioned to address HIV stigma, prevention, and care in African American communities. The authors describe an academic-community partnership to engage Black churches to address HIV in a predominantly African American, urban, southern Midwest location. The opportunities, process, and challenges in forming this academic-community partnership with Black churches can be used to guide future efforts toward engaging faith institutions, academia, and other community partners in the fight against HIV.

Water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to improve health among people living with HIV/AIDS: a systematic review.

DESIGN: People living with HIV/AIDS (PLHIV) are at increased risk of diarrhoeal disease and enteric infection. This review assesses the effectiveness of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions to prevent disease among PLHIV. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, LILACS, Africa-wide, IMEMR, IMSEAR, WPRIM, CNKI, and WanFang. We also hand searched conference proceedings, contacted researchers and organizations, and checked references from identified studies. Eligible studies were those involving WASH interventions among PLHIV that reported on health outcomes and employed a controlled study design. We extracted data, explored heterogeneity, sub-grouped based on outcomes, calculated pooled effects on diarrhoeal disease using meta-analysis, and assessed studies for methodological quality. RESULTS: Ten studies met the eligibility criteria and are included in the review, of which nine involved water quality interventions and one involved promotion of handwashing. Among eight studies that reported on diarrhoea, water quality interventions (seven studies, pooled RR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38-0.86) and the handwashing intervention (one study, RR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.33-0.54) were protective against diarrhoea. One study reported that household water treatment combined with insecticide treated bednets slowed the progression of HIV/AIDS. The validity of most studies is potentially compromised by methodological shortcomings. CONCLUSION: No studies assessed the impact of improved water supply or sanitation, the most fundamental of WASH interventions. Despite some evidence that water quality interventions and handwashing are protective against diarrhoea, substantial heterogeneity and the potential for bias raise questions about the actual level of protection.