Is diversion free ileal pouch-anal anastomosis a safe procedure? A meta-analysis of 4973 cases.

PURPOSE: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has been established as the procedure of choice for patients who require excision of the colon and rectum for familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis. The requirement for proximal stomal diversion in IPAA is controversial. OBJECTIVES: To compare post-operative outcomes following IPAA with and without proximal diversion. METHODS: Computerised literature search, of Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE. Full-text comparative studies published between 1992 and 2019, in English language and on adult patients. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with or without proximal stomal diversion following proctocolectomy. Outcome measures were anastomotic leak, anastomosis strictures, re-operations, pouch failure, intra-abdominal sepsis, small bowel obstruction/ileus and mortality. RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-six studies were screened. Fourteen relevant studies included 4973 cases (1832 patients with no stomas vs 3141 with stomas). Anastomotic strictures (p ≤ 0.0001 OR 0.40; 95% CI (0.26-0.62)) and pouch failures (p = 0.003 OR 0.54; 95% CI (0.36-0.82)) were higher in diverted than non-diverted patients. Re-operation was more frequently required in non-diverted patients (p = 0.02 OR 2.51; 95% CI (1.12-5.59)). Heterogeneity was low in 5 out of 7 variables. CONCLUSION: In selected patients, diversion-free IPAA is a safe procedure associated with lower anastomotic stricture and pouch failure rates than diverted IPAA. This appears to occur at the expense of a higher re-operation rate. An RCT is required to help define the selection criteria.

Feasibility of a novel exercise prehabilitation programme in patients scheduled for elective colorectal surgery: a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of delivering a functional exercise-based prehabilitation intervention and its effects on postoperative length of hospital stay, preoperative physical functioning and health-related quality of life in elective colorectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomised controlled feasibility trial, 22 elective colorectal surgery patients were randomly assigned to exercise prehabilitation (n = 11) or standard care (n = 11). Feasibility of delivering the intervention was assessed based on recruitment and compliance to the intervention. Impact on postoperative length of hospital stay and complications, preoperative physical functioning (timed up and go test, five times sit to stand, stair climb test, handgrip dynamometry and 6-min walk test) and health-related quality of life were also assessed. RESULTS: Over 42% of patients (84/198) screened were deemed ineligible for prehabilitation due to insufficient time existing prior to scheduled surgery. Of those who were eligible, approximately 18% consented to the trial. Median length of hospital stay was 8 [range 6-27] and 10 [range 5-12] days respectively for the standard care and prehabilitation groups. Patterns towards preoperative improvements for the timed up and go test, stair climb test and 6-min walk test were observed for all participants receiving prehabilitation but not standard care. CONCLUSIONS: Despite prehabilitation appearing to convey positive benefits on physical functioning, short surgical wait times and patient engagement represent major obstacles to implementing exercise prehabilitation programmes in colorectal cancer patients.

Quality of Local Excision for Rectal Neoplasms Using Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Versus Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Multi-institutional Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are no data comparing the quality of local excision of rectal neoplasms using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of tumor fragmentation and positive margins for patients undergoing local excision of benign and malignant rectal neoplasms using transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus transanal minimally invasive surgery. DESIGN: This was a multi-institutional cohort study using coarsened exact matching. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at high-volume tertiary institutions with specialist colorectal surgeons. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing full-thickness local excision for benign and malignant rectal neoplasms were included. INTERVENTIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery were the included interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of poor quality excision (composite measure including tumor fragmentation and/or positive resection margin) was measured. RESULTS: The matched cohort consisted of 428 patients (247 with transanal endoscopic microsurgery and 181 with transanal minimally invasive surgery). Transanal minimally invasive surgery was associated with shorter operative time and length of stay. Poor quality excision was similar (8% vs 11%; p = 0.233). There were also no differences in peritoneal violation (3% vs 3%; p = 0.965) and postoperative complications (11% vs 9%; p = 0.477). Cumulative 5-year disease-free survival for patients undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery was 80% compared with 78% for patients undergoing transanal minimally invasive surgery (log rank p = 0.824). The incidence of local recurrence for patients with malignancy who did not undergo immediate salvage surgery was 7% (8/117) for transanal endoscopic microsurgery and 7% (7/94) for transanal minimally invasive surgery (p = 0.864). LIMITATIONS: All of the procedures were also performed at high-volume referral centers by specialist colorectal surgeons with slightly differing perioperative practices and different time periods. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality local excision for benign and rectal neoplasms can be equally achieved using transanal endoscopic microsurgery or transanal minimally invasive surgery. The choice of operating platform for local excisions of rectal neoplasms should be based on surgeon preference, availability, and cost. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A382.

Correlation of rectal tumor volumes with oncological outcomes for low rectal cancers: does tumor size matter?

PURPOSES: Several reports have described a relationship between tumor volume and oncological outcomes for certain cancers. There is paucity of similar data for rectal cancer. We conducted this study to establish whether tumor volume, mesorectal volume, and the tumor volume to mesorectal volume ratio (TV/MRV), evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), affect the oncological outcomes of patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: We performed volumetric analysis of rectal tumors from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images and assessed their correlation with oncological outcomes, using clinical and radiological databases. RESULTS: The subjects of this study were 25 of 35 patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery after staging with MRI, after the exclusion of 7 patients for whom MRI images could not be retrieved and 3 patients who had metastases identified at diagnosis. Tumor volume (TV) was a significant predictor of overall survival hazard ratio (95% CI); 5.8 (1.2-29), (P = 0.03). Mesorectal volume (MRV) and TV/MRV did not correlate with oncological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We found a direct relationship between tumor volume and overall survival, which may be used to stratify rectal tumors for neoadjuvant therapy. A larger prospective study is required to confirm this correlation.

Registration rates, adequacy of registration, and a comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials published in surgery journals.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of registered trials published in the surgical literature, to compare, in registered trials, the primary outcomes registered with those published and to determine whether outcome-reporting bias favored significant primary outcomes. BACKGROUND: Trial protocol registration before patient enrolment for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is a perquisite for many journals in attempt to decrease publication and selective reporting bias. Analysis of the medical literature demonstrates poor registration rates with discrepancies between reported and registered primary outcomes. This has not been evaluated in contemporary surgical journals. METHODS: RCTs were identified for 2009 and 2010 from 10 high-impact factor surgical journals. One investigator identified all RCTs and extracted primary and secondary outcomes, dates of commencement and completion of study, funding source, and trial registration number. Trial registers were searched using the trial registration number for primary and secondary outcomes, dates of commencement and completion of study, and date of registration. Trial registration rates and registration adequacy were recorded. Register and published primary outcomes were then compared. RESULTS: A total of 246 papers were analyzed, among which 86 (34.9%) were not registered and 52 (21%) were inadequately registered. Of the 108 adequately registered trials, 32 (29%) had a discrepancy between the published primary outcome and that registered in trial register. In the 24 published studies where it was possible to assess, the discrepancy favored a statistically significant primary outcome in 22 (91.7%) whereas in 2 (8.3%) the discrepancy produced a statistically insignificant result. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of all RCTs published in general surgical journals were adequately registered, and approximately 30% had discrepancies in the registered and published primary outcome with 90% of those assessable favoring a statistically positive result.

Management of acute diverticulitis and its complications.

Colonic diverticular disease is a common condition, and around a quarter of people affected by it will experience acute symptoms at some time. The most common presentation is uncomplicated acute diverticulitis that can be managed conservatively with bowel rest and antibiotics. However, some patients will present with diverticular abscesses or purulent or faeculent peritonitis due to perforated diverticular disease. Whilst most mesocolic abscesses can be managed with percutaneous drainage alone, pelvic abscesses are associated with a higher rate of future complications and usually require percutaneous drainage followed by interval sigmoid resection. Patients who require emergency surgery for complicated acute diverticulitis most commonly undergo a Hartmann's procedure, although resection with primary anastomosis and laparoscopic peritoneal lavage have emerged as alternative treatment options for patients with purulent peritonitis in recent years. However, robust evidence from randomized trials is lacking for these alternative procedures, and the studies that have reported good outcomes from them have included carefully selected patient groups. There has been a move away from recommending elective prophylactic colectomy after two episodes of acute diverticulitis in the light of evidence that most patients will not experience a significant recurrence of their symptoms; elective surgery is indicated for those with ongoing symptoms, pelvic abscesses, complications-such as fistulating disease, strictures or recurrent diverticular bleeding-and those who are at high risk of perforation during future episodes, for example, due to immunosuppression, chronic renal failure or collagen-vascular diseases.

Evaluation of the impact of implementing the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision of the rectum.

BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal excision of rectum has been associated with poor oncological specimens and high local recurrence rates in comparison with restorative surgery. The role of recent changes in operative position has yet to be evaluated. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine whether a change in the perineal phase from the Lloyd-Davies position to the prone jackknife position might improve excision margins and oncological outcomes. METHODS: A single-institution review of a prospectively maintained database comparing the quality of excision and oncological outcomes after abdominoperineal excision in conventional and prone position was performed. Consecutive abdominoperineal excisions performed for adenocarcinoma of the rectum between January 1999 and April 2008 were included. RESULTS: Abdominoperineal excision cases were assessed including 63 in the Lloyd-Davies position and 58 in the prone jackknife position. The 5-year local recurrence rate was 5% in the prone jackknife group in comparison with 23% in the Lloyd-Davies group (p = 0.03) by life table analysis. For local recurrence, the most significant and independent risk factors were a favorable effect of having the patient in the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision (HR 0.2; 95% CI 0.04-0.81) and, unfavorably, a positive circumferential resection margin (HR 7.1; 95% CI 2.4-20). Lymph node involvement (N2) was an independent risk factor for overall survival (HR 4.6; 95% CI 2.1-9.5) and relapse of disease (HR 4.0; 95% CI 0.7-9.4). LIMITATIONS: This study has some limitations because it is a retrospective review of a prospective database. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the rate of local recurrence after abdominoperineal excision may be lowered by adaptation of the prone jackknife position.

Intraoperative contrast-enhanced sonography of bowel blood flow: preliminary experience.

OBJECTIVES: The potential to predict, and therefore avoid, anastomotic failure has eluded generations of colon and rectal surgeons to date. A reliable, reproducible method of assessing bowel blood flow therefore would be of enormous potential clinical relevance. To our knowledge, intraoperative contrast-enhanced sonography of the bowel has not been performed previously. We present our study assessing the feasibility of using contrast-enhanced sonography to study bowel perfusion intraoperatively. METHODS: We studied 8 patients (4 male and 4 female) with an age range of 52 to 81 years who underwent colorectal surgery (right hemicolectomies, n = 3; Hartmann procedure, n = 1; anterior resections, n = 2; and bowel resections with ileocolic anastomoses, n = 2). A 5-mL bolus of a sulfur hexafluoride contrast agent solution was injected before and after vascular ligation with simultaneous noncompression ultrasound scanning directly over the large bowel. The patients were followed clinically to assess for leaks. Contrast-enhanced sonographic time-intensity curves were generated for the time to peak and maximum amplitude. RESULTS: Moderate interobserver agreement was shown for the time to peak (κ = 0.50) and maximum amplitude (κ = 0.42), and moderate intraobserver agreement was shown for the time to peak (κ= 0.53) and maximum amplitude (κ= 0.53). No significant differences were shown between the time to peak (P = .28) and maximum amplitude (P = .49) for the preligation and postligation scans. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, intraoperative contrast-enhanced sonography of the bowel has not been performed previously. We have shown the technique to be feasible with good intraobserver and interobserver agreement. Further work is ongoing to optimize the technique and assess its use in predicting anastomotic breakdown.

Avoiding radical surgery after pre-operative chemoradiotherapy: a possible therapeutic option in rectal cancer?

BACKGROUND: In this modern era of multi-modality treatment there is increasing interest in the possibility of avoiding radical surgery in complete responders after neo-adjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCPRT). In this article, we present a systematic review of such treatments and discuss their therapeutic applicability for the future. METHODS: We searched the PubMed online libraries to identify studies that reported on the long-term surgical and pathological outcomes after local excision together with those that explored the possibility of clinical observation only in patients achieving a complete clinical response after LCPRT. RESULTS: Several retrospective (n = 10), one single-arm prospective, and one small randomised series have reported on the use of local excision after LCPRT and demonstrated acceptably low levels of local recurrence with survival comparable to patients progressing to conventional surgery. One prospective series allocated patients to observation or radical surgery based on histological parameters after local excision (ypT0 and ypT1) and showed no differences in outcomes. Two retrospective series from the same group on a Brazilian cohort of patients reported excellent long-term outcomes after "wait and watch" in complete clinical responders. However, other reports have shown no direct correlation between clinical and pathological response. CONCLUSION: Local excision may be an appropriate option for selected patients developing good clinical response after LCPRT. In our opinion, a policy of clinical observation in complete clinical responders after LCPRT may not be a safe strategy, unless we had robust predictive models for accurate identification of pathological complete response. In order to identify patients that may be potentially appropriate for such an approach we propose a clinical algorithm incorporating important clinical, radiological, and pathological parameters. The proposed model will require validation in a prospective study. Finally, we need randomised data for demonstrating the non-inferiority of clinical observation compared to conventional surgery before this can be considered as standard possible therapeutic option.

Intramucosal carcinoma on biopsy reliably predicts invasive colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of invasive malignancy on biopsies from colorectal neoplasms can be challenging. The concept of intramucosal carcinoma as an indicator of invasive malignancy is somewhat controversial within histopathology circles despite current World Health Organization (WHO) definitions. This study was designed to correlate the biopsy finding of intramucosal carcinoma with the pathology findings after formal surgical excision. METHODOLOGY: We evaluated 89 patients whose initial forceps biopsy contained only intramucosal carcinoma. All tumors were subsequently resected and subjected to formal pathology assessment. RESULTS: Of 89 patients, 97% were shown to have frankly invasive adenocarcinoma by the current WHO definition. The positive predictive value of intramucosal carcinoma at biopsy for invasive cancer was 96.6% CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that there should be a greater willingness among colorectal pathologists to accept the biopsy finding of intramucosal carcinoma as the earlier form of invasive malignancy. Clinicians should alter their treatment algorithms accordingly.

Advances in radiotherapy in operable rectal cancer.

AIMS: Radiotherapy (RT) reduces local recurrence in rectal cancer but the optimal treatment schedule is unknown. Relevant questions in designing optimal therapy are set out. This review identifies evidence that influences current practice and shapes future trials in treatment of operable rectal cancer. METHODS: PubMed and MEDLINE search. RESULTS: RT reduces local recurrence and pre-operative treatment is superior to post-operative treatment. Longer interval to surgery and concurrent chemotherapy are associated with greater downstaging, although influence on sphincter preservation and survival is minimal. Short-course RT (SCRT) demonstrates lower recurrence, but with long-term dysfunction and minimal survival benefit. The role of SCRT should be re-evaluated to encompass new criteria/areas. CONCLUSION: SCRT should be used selectively rather than as a blanket treatment policy. SCRT compounds functional morbidity caused by mesorectal excision which may be excessive in some patient groups, especially early-stage rectal cancer or frail elderly patients. RT and local excision may be a feasible surgical alternative in these groups. Alternatively, SCRT and delayed surgery may be a future alternative to current long-course chemoradiotherapy. As survival is only marginally affected despite low local recurrence, future trials should aim to address metastatic disease. End points which incorporate function and quality of life must be used.

Brush cytology for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of brush cytology for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and compare them with the results of endoscopic biopsy and histologic evaluation of the resected specimen. METHODS: Nine hundred eighteen patients who had brush cytology, endoscopic biopsy, and a definitive resection of a colorectal lesion between 1990 to 2006 were identified from our pathology database. RESULTS: Cytology alone had a sensitivity of 88.2 percent, a specificity of 94.1 percent, a positive predictive value of 98.6 percent, and a negative predictive value of 61.9 percent for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Brush cytology always recognized malignant cells, with a positive predictive value of 100 percent. There was no significant difference between brush cytology and biopsy, which had a sensitivity of 86.9 percent, specificity of 98.1 percent, positive predictive value of 99.5 percent, and a negative predictive value of 60.3 percent. Combining the results of brush cytology and biopsy resulted in a statistically significant increase in sensitivity to 97.4 percent (P < 0.001), a significant increase in the negative predictive value to 88.4 percent (P < 0.001), and a significant reduction in the false-negative rate to 0.03 percent (P < 0.001) for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Brush cytology is as accurate as endoscopic biopsy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and combining these two diagnostic modalities resulted in a significant improvement in the definitive diagnosis of cancer, which might reduce the need for further biopsy.

Radiographic work-up and treatment of lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage is a common reason for hospital admission. Spontaneous cessation occurs in the majority of these patients; however, continued major bleeding is a difficult clinical problem. Emergency surgery, without prior knowledge of the bleeding site is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Accurate localization is therefore desirable. The authors present a review of current radiological imaging modalities and therapeutic options available to the clinician. They also provide a management algorithm to aid in the strategic management of this group of patients.

Mesorectal grades predict recurrences after curative resection for rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Local recurrence after curative excision for rectal cancer is frequently regarded as a failure of surgery. The macroscopic quality of the excised mesorectum after total mesorectal excision has been proposed as a means of assessment of the adequacy of surgery. This study was designed to determine the utility of mesorectal grading in prediction of local and overall recurrence after curative surgery. METHODS: All patients undergoing resection for primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum had a mesorectal grading prospectively applied to their resection specimens, according to the classification proposed by Quirke et al. (Grades 1-3; 3 is the best). The outcome of patients undergoing potentially curative surgery from 2001 to 2003 was reviewed. Prognostic significance of mesorectal grades was determined by multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients with a median follow-up of 26 (range, 17-42) months were studied. The local and overall recurrences were 8.4 and 15 percent, respectively. The mesorectum was reported as Grade 3 in 61 patients (47 percent), Grade 2 in 52 patients (40 percent), and Grade 1 in 17 patients (13 percent). Patients with Grade 1 mesorectum had 41 percent local recurrence and 59 percent overall recurrence, respectively. However, patients with Grade 2 and Grade 3 mesorectum had 5.7 and 1.6 percent local recurrences, respectively, and 17 and 1.6 percent overall recurrence, respectively. By Cox's regression analysis, grade of mesorectum independently influenced both local and overall recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: The macroscopic quality of mesorectum after curative excision of rectal cancer is an important predictor of local and overall recurrences. The mesorectal grades may be of value in decisions regarding postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Routine follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging does not improve detection of resectable local recurrences from colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if routine follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves the detection of resectable local recurrences from colorectal cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical treatment offers the best prospect of survival for patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Unfortunately, most cases are often diagnosed at an unresectable stage when traditional follow-up methods are used. The impact of MRI surveillance on the early diagnosis of local recurrences has yet to be ascertained. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative surgery for rectal and left-sided colon tumors were included in a program of pelvic surveillance by routine MRI, in addition to the standard follow-up protocol. Cases were then analyzed for mode of diagnosis, resectability, and overall survival. RESULTS: Pelvic recurrence was found in 30 (13%) of the 226 patients studied. MRI detected 26 of 30 (87%) and missed 4 of 30 (13%) cases with local recurrence. Of the latter, 3 were anastomotic recurrences. In 28 (14%) patients, local recurrence was suspected by an initial MR scan but cleared by subsequent MRI or CT-guided biopsy. Recurrent pelvic cancer was diagnosed by MRI with 87% sensitivity and 86% specificity. In 19 (63%) cases, CEA was abnormally elevated, and 9 patients (30%) were symptomatic. Surgical resection was possible in only 6 patients (20%). There was no difference between MRI and conventional follow-up tests in their ability to detect cases suitable for surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic surveillance by MRI is not justified as part of the routine follow-up after a curative resection for colorectal cancer and should be reserved for selectively imaging patients with clinical, colonoscopic, and/or biochemical suspicion of recurrent disease.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx metastasising to rectum: first case report and literature review.

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the nasopharynx is amongst the most common head and neck cancers. However, distant metastases are clinically underdiagnosed, as demonstrated by significantly higher metastatic rates in autopsy studies, compared to clinical studies. The incidence of metastases continues to rise with improvements in diagnostic imaging, locoregional control and survival. Metastases to the colorectum are extremely rare. This is the first case of nasopharyngeal SCC, metastasising to the rectum. A brief review of the literature is performed, with discussion on the screening, diagnosis and treatment of non-primary / metastatic tumours of the colorectum, from SCC and other primary tumours.

A case-control study of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy vs. open right hemicolectomy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to examine all laparoscopic right hemicolectomies performed for cancer in our unit and to compare them with a case-control series of open right hemicolectomies, with emphasis on long-term survival. METHODS: In a retrospective case-control series of right hemicolectomies, those done laparoscopically were compared with an age-matched and stage-matched series of patients who underwent open surgery. Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were included in the study, 33 laparoscopic and 66 open. Mean age 69.7 years. Dukes staging was the same between the two groups and mean follow-up period was 65.7 months. There were six laparoscopic conversions. The number of days patients were kept nil by mouth was significantly less in the laparoscopic cohort, with a mean of 2.4 days vs. a mean of 3.65 days (P = 0.005, Mann-Whitney U test). The number of days during which patients required parenteral opiates was significantly less in the laparoscopic cohort, with a mean number of days of 2.5, in contrast to 4.5 days in the open group (P = 0.008, Mann-Whitney U test). When overall survival was compared between the open and laparoscopic groups, no difference was found, with a mean overall survival of 40 months in the laparoscopic cohort and 39.4 months in the open cohort (P = 0.348, log-rank test). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer does not compromise long-term survival and affords the advantage of a shorter period of postoperative ileus and decreased analgesia requirements.

Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial.

Advantages of the stapling procedure for haemorrhoids include reduced postoperative pain and shortened convalescence; however, there are few data with respect to functional and symptomatic outcome. At a dedicated clinic, we reviewed patients between Dec, 2001, and March, 2002, who had taken part in a randomised controlled trial undertaken at the unit in 1999, which compared outcomes after open or stapled haemorrhoidectomy. We noted the presence or absence of haemorrhoid specific symptoms, and assessed overall satisfaction, continence, and quality of life. Rigid sigmoidoscopy and an anorectal examination were also used to examine symptomatic recurrence and disease activity. At minimum follow-up of 33 months since surgery, both techniques seem to be equally effective.