RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: There is a need for effective interventions that improve diabetes self-management (DSM) among socioeconomically deprived patients with type 2 diabetes. The group-based intervention Powerful Together with Diabetes (PTWD) aimed to increase social support for DSM and decrease social influences hindering DSM (eg, peer pressure, social norms) in patients living in deprived neighbourhoods. Through a qualitative process evaluation, this paper aims to study whether this intervention changed social support and social influences, and which elements of the intervention contributed to this. METHODS: The intervention group (IG) was compared with a standard group-based educational intervention (control group, CG). 27 qualitative in-depth interviews with participants (multiethnic sample) and 24 interviews with group leaders were conducted. Interviews were coded and analysed using MAXQDA according to framework analysis. RESULTS: Patients in the IG experienced more emotional support from group members and more instrumental and appraisal support from relatives than those in the CG. Also, they were better able to recognise and cope with influences that hinder their DSM, exhibited more positive norms towards DSM and increased their priority regarding DSM and their adherence. Finally, the engagement in DSM by relatives of participants increased. Creating trust between group members, skills training, practising together and actively involving relatives through action plans contributed to these changes. CONCLUSIONS: A group-based intervention aimed at creating trust, practising together and involving relatives has the potential to increase social support and diminish social influences hindering DSM in socioeconomically deprived patients with diabetes. Promising elements of the intervention were skills training and providing feedback using role-playing exercises in group sessions with patients, as well as the involvement of patients' significant others in self-management tasks, and actively involving them in making an action plan for self-management. These positive results justify the value of further evaluating the effectiveness of this intervention in a larger sample. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR1886, Results.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Áreas de Pobreza , Autocuidado/métodos , Meio Social , Apoio Social , Adulto , Idoso , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Autocuidado/normasRESUMO
To gain some insight into the structural and functional roles of sterols in higher plant cells, various plant sterols have been incorporated into soybean phosphatidylcholine (PtdCho) bilayers and tested for their ability to regulate water permeability and acyl chain ordering. Sitosterol was the most efficient sterol in reducing the water permeability of these vesicles and stigmasterol appeared to have no significant effect. Vesicles containing 24zeta-methylcholesterol exhibited an intermediate behavior, similar to that of vesicles containing cholesterol. Cycloartenol, the first cyclic biosynthetic precursor of plant sterols, reduced the water permeability in a very effective way. Of two unusual plant sterols, 24-methylpollinastanol and 14alpha,24zeta-dimethylcholest-8-en-3beta-ol, the former was found to be functionally equivalent to sitosterol and the latter was found to be relatively inefficient. 2H NMR experiments have been performed with oriented bilayers consisting of soybean PtdCho with sitosterol, stigmasterol, or 24-methylpollinastanol. The results provided clear evidence that sitosterol and 24zeta-methylpollinastanol exhibit a high efficiency to order PtdCho acyl chains that closely parallels their ability to reduce water permeability. By contrast, stigmasterol shows a low efficiency for both functions. These results show that sitosterol and stigmasterol, two major 24-ethylsterols differing only by the absence or presence of the Delta22 double bond in the side chain, probably play different roles in regulating plant membrane properties; they also may explain why 9beta,19-cyclopropylsterols behave as good surrogates of sitosterol.