Randomised phase II trial of trofosfamide vs. doxorubicin in elderly patients with untreated metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma.

Doxorubicin represents the standard first-line treatment for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. We assessed the efficacy and safety of trofosfamide in elderly patients. In this controlled phase II trial, we randomly (1:2) assigned 120 previously untreated patients with soft-tissue sarcoma, older than 60 years, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0-2, to receive either doxorubicin for 6 cycles (arm A) or oral trofosfamide (arm B). The primary end-point was a 6-month progression-free rate (PFR) in the experimental arm (clinical trial information: NCT00204568). Between August 2004 and October 2012, forty and 80 patients were randomly assigned to arm A and arm B, respectively, in 16 centres. The median age was 70 years (range, 60-89). The primary study end-point (6-month PFR) was exceeded, with 27.6% in arm B (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.0-39.1) and 35.9% in arm A: (95% CI, 21.2-52.8). Survival data in terms of progression-free survival were 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.2-6.3) and 2.8 months (95% CI, 1.7-3.6) and in terms of overall survival were 9.8 months (95% CI, 6.7-11.6) and 12.3 months (95% CI, 9.6-16.2), respectively. The number of serious adverse event (SAE) was 59% in arm A and 30.3% in arm B (p = 0.005). Trofosfamide caused more often dyspnoea and low-grade fatigue, whereas with doxorubicin, more often leukocytopenia, neutropenia and mucositis were seen. Discontinuation rates for reasons other than disease progression were 15.4% (arm A) vs. 7.9% (arm B). In an elderly population of patients, oral trofosfamide achieved the estimated primary end-point 6-month PFR and was associated with a favourable toxicity profile compared with doxorubicin.

A randomised phase II study of pemetrexed versus pemetrexed+erlotinib as second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Pemetrexed and erlotinib have been approved as second-line monotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel phase II study assessed efficacy and safety of pemetrexed versus pemetrexed+erlotinib in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. METHODS: NSCLC stage III-IV patients who failed one prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, ≥ 1 measurable lesion by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2 were eligible. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) with vitamin B12 and folic acid q3w alone or combined with erlotinib 150 mg daily. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTTF), response and toxicity. RESULTS: Of 165 randomised non-squamous patients, 159 were treated (pemetrexed: 83; pemetrexed+erlotinib: 76). The median PFS (months; 95% CI) was 2.89 (1.94, 3.38) for pemetrexed versus 3.19 (2.86, 4.70) for pemetrexed+erlotinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% CI: (0.44, 0.90); P = 0.0047). The median OS (months; 95% CI) was 7.75 (5.29, 10.41) for pemetrexed versus 11.83 (8.18, 16.66) for pemetrexed+erlotinib (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.98; P = 0.019). The median TTTF (months: 95% CI) was 2.4 (1.74, 2.99) for pemetrexed versus 3.0 (2.23, 4.07) for pemetrexed+erlotinib (HR 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.89; P = 0.0034). One patient died in pemetrexed+erlotinib arm due to febrile neutropenia. Grades 3/4 drug-related toxicities (in ≥ 5% of patients) in pemetrexed/pemetrexed+erlotinib were febrile neutropenia (2.4%/10.5%), diarrhoea (1.2%/5.3%), rash (1.2%/9.2%); anaemia (6%/11.8%), leukopenia (9.6%/23.7%), neutropenia (9.6%/25.0%), and thrombocytopenia (4.8%/14.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed+erlotinib treatment significantly improved PFS, OS and TTTF in 2nd line non-squamous NSCLC and was associated with an increase in grade 3/4 toxicities compared with pemetrexed alone.

Activity of eribulin mesylate in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: a phase 2 study in four independent histological subtypes.

BACKGROUND: Eribulin inhibits microtubule dynamics via a mechanism distinct from that of other tubulin-targeting drugs, inducing cell-cycle arrest and tumour regression in preclinical models. We assessed the activity and safety of eribulin in four strata of patients with different types of soft-tissue sarcoma. METHODS: In this non-randomised multicentre phase 2 study, patients were included if they had progressive or high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma and had received no more than one previous combination chemotherapy or up to two single drugs for advanced disease. They were stratified by the type of soft-tissue sarcoma they had. Eribulin was given intravenously at a concentration of 1·4 mg/m(2) over 2-5 min at days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks to primarily assess progression-free survival at 12 weeks (RECIST 1.0), which we evaluated in all patients who started treatment. Safety analyses were done in all patients who started treatment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00413192. FINDINGS: Of 128 patients included, 37 had adipocytic sarcoma, 40 had leiomyosarcoma, 19 had synovial sarcoma, and 32 had other sarcomas. 12 (31·6%) of 38 patients with leiomyosarcoma evaluable for the primary endpoint, 15 (46·9%) of 32 patients with adipocytic sarcoma, four (21·1%) of 19 with synovial sarcoma, and five (19·2%) of 26 in other sarcomas were progression-free at 12 weeks. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (66 [52%] of 127 patients evaluable for safety), leucopenia (44 [35%]), anaemia (nine [7%]), fatigue (nine [7%]), febrile neutropenia (eight [6%]), abnormal alanine aminotransferase concentrations (six [5%]), mucositis (four [3%]), and sensory neuropathy (four [3%]). INTERPRETATION: Eribulin deserves further study in this setting, based on progression-free survival at 12 weeks in leiomyosarcoma and adipocytic sarcoma. FUNDING: Eisai Limited, Hatfield, UK.

Evaluation of a non cystatin-C-based novel algorithm to calculate individual glomerular filtration rate in cancer patients receiving carboplatin.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the potential utility of a novel algorithm to calculate individual GFR values in cancer patients. Based on carboplatin AUC measurements the algorithm-based values were compared with results related to other routinely used equations. METHODS: The association between measured and predicted carboplatin AUC was examined by the Bland-Altman analysis to determine bias and precision. Based on the Calvert formula, GFR values assessed by different routes of calculation including the novel algorithm were compared with each other in individual patients. RESULTS: The mean absolute administered carboplatin dose was 498 mg and the mean measured carboplatin AUC 5.8 mg/ml × min. Compared to the novel algorithm, the degree of bias to calculate carboplatin AUC was greater with the Cockcroft-Gault, Chatelut, Hoek and Schmitt formula which includes cystatin C as a parameter. In selected patients, algorithm-based GFR values were closer to GFR according to the Calvert formula than results of other equations, including the Jelliffe formula. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the concept of a non cystatin C-based novel algorithm including three different formulas rather than one single equation may improve accurate estimation of GFR over a broad range of constitutive values, including patients with low constitutive renal function as well as overweight patients.

Definitive radiotherapy and single-agent radiosensitizing ifosfamide in patients with localized, irresectable soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Standard therapy for soft-tissue sarcomas remains complete resection. For primary radiotherapy local control rates of 30-45% have been reported. We analyzed retrospectively 11 cases of radiochemotherapy with single-agent ifosfamide in patients with macroscopic soft-tissue sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients were treated in irresectable high risk situations. Radiation therapy was performed with median 60 Gy. During the first and fifth week the concomitant chemotherapy with ifosfamide was added. Two patients received trimodal therapy with additional regional hyperthermia. RESULTS: The therapy was completed in 73% of the patients. Average local control time was 91 months, median disease-free-survival/overall-survival was 8/26 months. Five-year rates for local control/disease free survival/overall survival were 70%/34%/34%. The limited prognosis is mainly caused by systemic treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: The data strongly suggest a better outcome of radiochemotherapy with ifosfamide compared to radiotherapy alone and radiotherapy in combination with other radiosensitizers.

PET/CT with 18F-FLT: does it improve the therapeutic management of metastatic germ cell tumors?

UNLABELLED: Because (18)F-FDG PET alone has only limited value in metastatic germ cell tumors (GCTs), we investigated the addition of 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) to (18)F-FDG for early response monitoring and prediction of the histology of residual tumor masses in patients with metastatic GCT. METHODS: Eleven patients with metastatic GCT were examined with both (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-FLT PET/CT before chemotherapy, after the first cycle of chemotherapy (early response), and 3 wk after completion of chemotherapy. In 1 patient with negative (18)F-FLT PET/CT results before chemotherapy, no further (18)F-FLT scanning was performed. PET images were analyzed visually and, using standardized uptake values (SUVs), semiquantitatively. The results were compared with the findings of CT and tumor marker levels and validated by histopathologic examination of resected residual masses, including Ki-67 immunostaining (7 patients), or by clinicoradiologic follow-up for at least 6 mo (4 patients). A responder was defined as a patient showing the presence of necrosis, a complete remission, or a marker-negative partial remission within a minimum progression-free interval of 6 mo. Early treatment response was judged according to the criteria of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. RESULTS: Before chemotherapy, reference lesions showed increased (18)F-FDG uptake (mean SUV, 8.8; range, 2.9-15.0) in all patients and moderate (18)F-FLT uptake (mean SUV, 3.7; range, 1.7-9.7) in 10 of 11 patients. After 1 cycle of chemotherapy, mean SUV decreased in responders and nonresponders by 64% and 60%, respectively, for (18)F-FDG (P = 0.8) and by 58% and 48%, respectively, for (18)F-FLT (P = 0.5). After the end of chemotherapy, mean SUV decreased in responders and nonresponders by 85% and 73%, respectively, for (18)F-FDG (P = 0.1) and by 68% and 65%, respectively, for (18)F-FLT (P = 0.8). The results of early and final PET were inconsistent in 6 of 11 patients for (18)F-FDG and in 4 of 10 patients for (18)F-FLT. Both patients with teratoma had false-negative results on both (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FLT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detection of viable tumor after 1 cycle of chemotherapy were 60%, 33%, 43%, and 50%, respectively, for (18)F-FDG and 60%, 80%, 75%, and 67%, respectively, for (18)F-FLT PET/CT. The respective values after the end of chemotherapy were 20%, 100%, 100%, and 60% for (18)F-FDG and 0%, 100%, 0%, and 50% for (18)F-FLT PET/CT. CONCLUSION: PET-negative residual masses after chemotherapy of metastatic GCT still require resection, since the low negative predictive value of (18)F-FDG PET for viable tumor cannot be improved by application of (18)F-FLT.

Evaluation of response in malignant tumors treated with the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib: a multitechnique imaging assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to illustrate the characteristic changes induced in different tumor types by the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib reduces tumor perfusion and thereby induces necrosis and often hemorrhage. Malignant tumors treated with sorafenib undergo both morphologic and functional changes; however, the morphologic changes are less frequent and inadequate for early evaluation of response. Therefore, imaging tools accurately assessing hemorrhage and decrease in tumor perfusion with subsequent necrosis should be the mainstay in monitoring targeted therapy agents.

Surgery of colorectal carcinoma in patients aged over 80.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of colorectal carcinoma increases rapidly in aged patients. We investigated retrospectively the differences in treatment relative to the patients' age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 394 patients with colorectal carcinoma (group I: > or =80 years, n = 197; group II: 60-79 years, n = 197) were analyzed in an average period of 4 years in relation to surgery, comorbidities, postoperative morbidity, mortality, survival and recurrence. RESULTS: Patients > or =80 years had a significantly higher rate of comorbid conditions (p = 0.04; cardiovascular, p = 0.01; diabetes mellitus, p < 0.05) and more carcinomas in the sigmoid/rectum (72% vs. 67%; p < 0.05). Tumor stage, R0 resection rate, and overall complication rate were not influenced by age. The 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher in group I (12% vs. 3%; p = 0.02). Emergency surgical procedures were required significantly more often in group I (14%) than in group II (5%; p = 0.003). The 5-year survival rate among patients in group I was 30.1% compared to 50.5% among patients in group II (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients have a higher rate of comorbidity and a higher postoperative 30-day mortality rate. Tumor stage, R0 resection rate, and overall postoperative complication rate do not appear to be influenced by age. The higher rate of emergency operations on patients > or =80 years is associated with the higher 30-day mortality. Even in patients aged > or =80 years, attention should focus on the long-term oncological results, after appropriate assessment of the preoperative risk.

Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized study assessed whether the best overall response rate (ORR) of cetuximab combined with oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFOX-4) was superior to that of FOLFOX-4 alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. The influence of KRAS mutation status was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) initial dose followed by 250 mg/m(2)/wk thereafter) plus FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on day 1, plus leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) and fluorouracil as a 400 mg/m(2) bolus followed by a 600 mg/m(2) infusion during 22 hours on days 1 and 2; n = 169) or FOLFOX-4 alone (n = 168). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. KRAS mutation status was assessed in the subset of patients with assessable tumor samples (n = 233). RESULTS: The confirmed ORR for cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 was higher than with FOLFOX-4 alone (46% v 36%). A statistically significant increase in the odds for a response with the addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX-4 could not be established (odds ratio = 1.52; P = .064). In patients with KRAS wild-type tumors, the addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX-4 was associated with a clinically significant increased chance of response (ORR = 61% v 37%; odds ratio = 2.54; P = .011) and a lower risk of disease progression (hazard ratio = 0.57; P = .0163) compared with FOLFOX-4 alone. Cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: KRAS mutational status was shown to be a highly predictive selection criterion in relation to the treatment decision regarding the addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX-4 for previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Novel algorithm for more accurate calculation of renal function in adults with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cytotoxic agents have a narrow therapeutic window. A high percentage of some of them is renally excreted in unchanged form. Accurate assessment of an individual's glomerular filtration rate (GFR) helps to predict the pharmacokinetic behavior of those drugs more precisely. GFR calculations, however, have their limitations. OBJECTIVE: To establish a more accurate calculation of renal function over a broad range of constitutive GFR values. METHODS: Patients with cancer were included in the analysis. Serum levels of cystatin C, creatinine, urea, albumin, and beta-trace protein were measured, and GFR was calculated by 8 mathematical formulas. The results were compared with creatinine clearance (CrCl) calculated from timed urine specimens. RESULTS: One hundred two patients were evaluated: median age, 57.5 years (range 20-91); females, 52; males, 50; and mean urinary CrCl, 77.0 mL/min. The bias (mean percentage error) was -2% and the precision (mean absolute percentage error) was 23% for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) estimation of GFR. All equations significantly overestimated CrCl in patients with measured clearance less than 50 mL/min (p < 0.05), with the exception of the modified Salazar-Corcoran formula. All equations underestimated CrCl in patients with measured clearance greater than 100 mL/min. The Wright formula was the least biased and most precise (-5%, 16%, respectively). In patients with measured CrCl 50-100 mL/min, the MDRD calculation had a bias of -4% and a precision of 17%. The Jelliffe and Larsson equations were associated with significant sex bias (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that individual GFR values over a broad range cannot be calculated accurately enough with only one selected formula. It may be useful to classify renal function of patients with cancer according to the novel algorithm by using MDRD first and then to subsequently calculate GFR in higher and lower ranges with the Wright and modified Salazar-Corcoran formulas, respectively. This algorithm should be validated using larger numbers of patients.

PTEN and p27Kip1 are not downregulated in the majority of renal cell carcinomas--implications for Akt activation.

Activation of the PKB/Akt pathway is supposed to substantially contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of malignant disease. The present study aimed at determining the occurrence of an impaired PTEN and p27Kip1 expression alone or in combination in a renal cell carcinoma to further clarify the role of Akt-pathway-associated proteins for the development and/or progression of this malignant disease. By using tissue microarray analysis, tissue samples from renal cell cancers and the corresponding benign tissue samples were investigated for expression of the PTEN, pAkt and p27Kip1 protein by immunohistochemistry. Additionally, a Western blot and RT-PCR analysis was performed to verify the results obtained from the immunohistochemical approach and to further clarify the mechanisms underlying the regulation of both proteins in renal cell cancer. Western blot analysis revealed an overexpression of PTEN and p27Kip1 in renal cell cancer samples and a significantly elevated expression of both proteins when compared with the corresponding benign tissue (p<0.0001 and p<0.0005). The latter finding was confirmed by real-time RT-PCR (p<0.05 and p<0.01) and immunohistochemistry (p<0.001 and p<0.0001). PTEN and p27Kip1 expression were positively correlated with each other both in the tumour and benign tissue (p<0.001 and p<0.0001). We concluded that a strong expression of PTEN in renal cell cancer did not block the PI3K-mediated phosphorylation of Akt in the tumour specimens analysed. Furthermore, Akt activation may not result in a decreased p27Kip1, the latter being retained and overexpressed in the majority of renal cell cancers when compared with the corresponding benign renal parenchyma.

Phase III trial in metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with fluorouracil, leucovorin plus either oxaliplatin or cisplatin: a study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction were randomly assigned to receive either fluorouracil 2,600 mg/m(2) via 24-hour infusion, leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) (FLO) every 2 weeks or fluorouracil 2,000 mg/m(2) via 24-hour infusion, leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) weekly, and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks (FLP). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Two hundred twenty patients (median age, 64 years; metastatic, 94%) were randomly assigned. FLO was associated with significantly less (any grade) anemia (54% v 72%), nausea (53% v 70%), vomiting (31% v 52%), alopecia (22% v 39%), fatigue (19% v 34%), renal toxicity (11% v 34%), thromboembolic events (0.9% v 7.8%), and serious adverse events related to the treatment (9% v 19%). FLP was associated with significantly less peripheral neuropathy (22% v 63%). There was a trend toward improved median PFS with FLO versus FLP (5.8 v 3.9 months, respectively; P = .077) and no significant difference in median overall survival (10.7 v 8.8 months, respectively). However, in patients older than 65 years (n = 94), treatment with FLO resulted in significantly superior response rates (41.3% v 16.7%; P = .012), time to treatment failure (5.4 v 2.3 months; P < .001), and PFS (6.0 v 3.1 month; P = .029) and an improved OS (13.9 v 7.2 months) as compared with FLP, respectively. CONCLUSION: FLO reduced toxicity as compared with FLP. In older adult patients, FLO also seemed to be associated with improved efficacy.

Phase II study of plitidepsin in pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the progression-free rate (PFR) at 3 months (13+/-1 weeks), antitumor response, time-to-event efficacy endpoints, and toxicity profile of plitidepsin administered as a 3-h continuous i.v. infusion at a dose of 5mg/m(2), every 2 weeks, to patients with chemotherapy pretreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, non-randomized, exploratory, phase II study. Treatment lasted until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient refusal or treatment delay for >2 weeks. PFR (primary efficacy endpoint) and objective response rate (secondary efficacy endpoint) were evaluated according to RECIST, while the toxic profile of plitidepsin was assessed using the NCI-CTC, version 2.0. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients with a median age of 61 years and with locally advanced or metastatic non-resectable NSCLC, who had previously received only one line of chemotherapy in an advanced setting, received a total of 54 cycles of treatment (median of two cycles per patient; range: 1-8). Antitumor activity was seen in 3 (1 PR, 2 SD) out of 17 evaluable patients according to RECIST. One patient was responder for the primary (PFR at 13+/-1 weeks) and secondary efficacy endpoint (stable disease according to RECIST). Other two patients were non-responders for the primary efficacy endpoint, but had stable disease (not confirmed at weeks 13+/-1 due to previous withdrawal due to adverse events). With a median follow-up of 12.3 months, the median time to progression (TTP) and the median overall survival (OS) were 1.2 months and 4.3 months, respectively. The incidence of plitidepsin-related toxicities was low and most of them were mild-to-moderate in severity. The most common side effects were anemia, and asymptomatic and non-cumulative increases of gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) and liver transaminase levels. CONCLUSION: This study shows that plitidepsin 3-h continuous i.v. infusion (5mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks, was feasible and well tolerated in patients with pretreated NSCLC. The lack of evidence of antitumor activity precludes further studies with this plitidepsin schedule in this tumor setting.

Focal progression in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors after initial response to imatinib mesylate: a three-center-based study of 38 patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the outcome of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) exhibiting focal disease progression during imatinib therapy, treated by surgical resection and imatinib continuation. METHODS: A consecutive series of 38 patients with metastatic GISTs who underwent treatment with imatinib at our centers during a defined period of time was evaluated. Patients were evaluated for demographics including tumor-related features, initial response, disease recurrence, and salvage treatment modalities, and were classified as having either focal or generalized progression upon presentation prior to salvage therapy. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 31.8 months, 25 of the 38 (65.8%) patients had progressed. Nine (36%) patients were classified as having focal and 16 (64%) as having generalized progression. Salvage therapies were: surgical resection and imatinib dose escalation in patients exhibiting focal progression and imatinib dose escalation alone in the majority of patients exhibiting generalized progression. Focal progression was associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after salvage therapy as compared with generalized progression (median PFS and OS, 11.3 months and not attained, versus 2.5 and 22.8 months, respectively). Six-month PFS was 89% and 39% in patients exhibiting focal and generalized progression, respectively. KIT mutation analysis of controlled and progressive lesions was performed in 4 patients with focal progression. Secondary KIT mutations affected progressive lesions, whereas nonprogressive lesions harbored the original mutations only. CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced GIST exhibiting focal disease progression during imatinib therapy may benefit from surgical resection and imatinib continuation. Imatinib resistance seems to be partial in these patients.

Single versus sequential high-dose chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors: a prospective randomized multicenter trial of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: To compare single versus sequential high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) as first or subsequent salvage treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors (GCTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 1999 and November 2004, 230 patients were planned to be recruited in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial comparing one cycle of cisplatin 100 mg/m2, etoposide 375 mg/m2, and ifosfamide 6 g/m2 (VIP) plus three cycles of high-dose carboplatin 1,500 mg/m2 and etoposide 1,500 mg/m2 (CE; arm A) versus three cycles of VIP plus one cycle of high-dose carboplatin 2,200 mg/m2, etoposide 1,800 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 6,400 mg/m2 (CEC; arm B). RESULTS: The study was stopped prematurely after recruitment of 216 patients as a result of excess treatment-related mortality in arm B. One hundred eleven (51%) of 216 patients were randomly assigned to sequential HDCT, and 105 (47%) of 216 patients were randomly assigned to single HDCT. Five (2%) of 216 patients had to be excluded because of non-GCT histologies at review. With a median follow-up time of 36 months, 109 (52%) of 211 patients were alive, and 91 (43%) of 211 patients were progression free. At 1 year, event-free, progression-free, and overall survival rates were 40%, 53%, and 80%, respectively, in arm A compared with 37%, 49%, and 61%, respectively, in arm B (P > .05 for all comparisons). Treatment-related deaths, mainly as a result of sepsis and cardiac toxicity, were less frequent in arm A (four of 108 patients, 4%) compared with arm B (16 of 103 patients, 16%; P < .01). CONCLUSION: We found no difference in survival probabilities between single HDCT using CE and sequential HDCT using CEC. Sequential HDCT was better tolerated and resulted in fewer treatment-related deaths.

Bendamustine hydrochloride in patients with refractory soft tissue sarcoma: a noncomparative multicenter phase 2 study of the German sarcoma group (AIO-001).

BACKGROUND: For patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS), no standard treatment is established after previous chemotherapy with anthracyclines and ifosfamide. Bendamustine hydrochloride is a bifunctional alkylating agent that is not cross-resistant to other DNA-interacting substances including anthracyclines and oxazaphosphorines. It has shown single-agent activity in refractory lymphoma, myeloma, and some solid tumors. A phase 2 study was initiated to evaluate the efficacy of bendamustine in previously treated patients. METHODS: Thirty-six of 44 screened patients were included and received a total of 101 cycles (median, 2 cycles; range, 1-8 cycles), 21 as second-line treatment and 15 as third-line treatment. The median age was 55 years (range, 18-79 years). Bendamustine was given as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) on 2 consecutive days and repeated every 28 days. Eighty-eight percent of cycles could be given without dose or schedule modification. RESULTS: The toxicity profile was mild, consisting of National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 3 neutropenia in 11% and grade 3 anemia in 9% of patients. Nonhematologic toxicities were noticed with CTC grade 3 fever in 3% of patients. No other grade 3 toxicity and no treatment-related toxic deaths were observed. The best overall response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria was 1 partial remission (3%) and disease stabilizations in 31% of patients. Six of 15 patients (40%) with leiomyosarcoma histology achieved stable disease. The estimated 3-month and 6-month progression-free survival rates were 35.3% and 23.5%, respectively, for all histologic subtypes included. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with refractory STS, bendamustine is well tolerated and appears moderately effective, particularly in patients with leiomyosarcoma histology.

Targeting telomerase activity by BIBR1532 as a therapeutic approach in germ cell tumors.

Germ cell tumors (GCT) possess a high activity of telomerase, a ribonucleoprotein complex compensating the erosion of telomeres during cell division by adding TTAGGG-repeats to the telomeric ends of chromosomes. Cisplatin, the most important drug in the treatment of GCT, preferentially acts on G-rich regions like telomeres. Inhibiting telomerase in tumors can result in telomere shortening and senescence and could increase the efficacy of chemotherapy in refractory patients. The study evaluated the promise of the small molecule telomerase inhibitor BIBR1532 as single agent and assessed a possible synergism with cisplatin in a preclinical model of GCT.GCT-derived cell line 2102EP was cultured with or without 10 microM of BIBR1532. Cell expansion was quantified in population doublings (PD). Telomere length was analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and flow cytometry (flow-FISH). The sensitivity of the cells towards cisplatin was determined by MTT-assay. Telomerase activity was assessed by TRAP assay. After 300 PD, telomere length diminished from 18.5 kb +/- 0.59 kb to 8.9 +/- 0.1 kb in BIBR1532 treated 2102 EP cells as compared to 14.5 +/- 0.0 kb in untreated control cells. Treated cells did not show altered growth kinetics compared to untreated counterparts. Despite effective shortening of telomeres, the sensitivity of the treated cells towards cisplatin did not increase. Concomitant treatment with BIBR1532 and cisplatin did not result in accelerated telomere shortening. Telomere length can be shortened significantly by telomerase inhibition in GCT cell line models. However, possibly in view of their extensive telomere "reserve," telomerase inhibition did neither result in increased sensitivity of 2102 EP cells to cisplatin nor did co-treated cells show accelerated telomere shortening.

Mitomycin C, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin as a salvage therapy for patients with cisplatin-resistant advanced gastric cancer: a phase I dose escalation trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed at evaluating the feasibility and toxicity of a salvage therapy with mitomycin C (MMC), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in patients with cisplatin-resistant advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: A 3-patient cohort dose-escalating study design was used. The patients received FLO: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, 5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 (24 h), leucovorin 200 mg/m2 on days 1, 15, and 29 plus MMC on day 1 (FLOM). The MMC dose was escalated from 6 to 12 mg/m2 in 2- mg/m2 steps. Cycles were repeated every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled in 4 treatment cohorts. The treatment was well tolerated with grade 3 or 4 nonhematological toxicities affecting less than 5% of patients. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 9 (45%), 7 (35%), and 5 (25%) of 20 patients, respectively. Mild but prolonged thrombocytopenia was dose limiting, requiring treatment discontinuation or a treatment delay >or=2 weeks in 8 (40%) of 20 patients. MMC 10 mg/m2 every 6 weeks was considered as the optimal dose in combination with FLO. Objective responses were observed in 7 (35%) of 20 patients, and 7 further patients (35%) had stable disease. Median time to progression and overall survival were 4.1 and 8 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged cumulative myelotoxicity was dose limiting in the therapy with MMC, 5-FU, and oxaliplatin. This combination chemotherapy seems to overcome cisplatin resistance in patients with advanced gastric cancer.