RESUMO
Central cord syndrome (CCS) predominantly manifests in elderly individuals with pre-existing cervical spondylosis resulting from hyperextension mechanisms. However, it is not exclusive to the older population and can occur in younger individuals following traumatic cervical spine injuries or, less frequently, due to nontraumatic causes. The impact of this syndrome is more pronounced in the upper extremities, where motor function experiences greater impairment compared to sensory function. CCS presents itself along a spectrum of severity. At one end, individuals may exhibit weakness confined to the hands and forearms while preserving sensory function. At the other extreme, complete quadriparesis may occur, albeit with sacral sparing being the sole indication of an incomplete spinal cord injury. This spectrum underscores the varied and nuanced clinical presentations within CCS. Moreover, concurrent acute stroke presentations can mimic CCS symptoms, further complicating the diagnostic process. The challenge lies in differentiating these two distinct conditions, particularly in an elderly population with overlapping risk factors. This diagnostic challenge adds a layer of complexity to clinical decision-making and underscores the importance of comprehensive evaluations in patients presenting with neurological symptoms. This case report presents a 73-year-old gentleman with a history of a recent stroke and motor vehicle accidents, highlighting the diagnostic challenges and multidisciplinary management required for concurrent CCS and stroke mimicry. This report is unique, as there are no existing case report publications detailing concurrent CCS and stroke. It emphasizes the necessity for a comprehensive diagnostic approach and coordinated care in managing such intricate cases.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Timing of passaging, passage number, passaging approaches and methods for cell identification are critical factors influencing the quality of neural stem cells (NSCs) culture. How to effectively culture and identify NSCs is a continuous interest in NSCs study while these factors are comprehensively considered. AIM: To establish a simplified and efficient method for culture and identification of neonatal rat brain-derived NSCs. METHODS: First, curved tip operating scissors were used to dissect brain tissues from new born rats (2 to 3 d) and the brain tissues were cut into approximately 1 mm3 sections. Filter the single cell suspension through a nylon mesh (200-mesh) and culture the sections in suspensions. Passaging was conducted with TrypLTM Express combined with mechanical tapping and pipetting techniques. Second, identify the 5th generation of passaged NSCs as well as the revived NSCs from cryopreservation. BrdU incorporation method was used to detect self-renew and proliferation capabilities of cells. Different NSCs specific antibodies (anti-nestin, NF200, NSE and GFAP antibodies) were used to identify NSCs specific surface markers and muti-differentiation capabilities by immunofluorescence staining. RESULTS: Brain derived cells from newborn rats (2 to 3 d) proliferate and aggregate into spherical-shaped clusters with sustained continuous and stable passaging. When BrdU was incorporated into the 5th generation of passaged cells, positive BrdU cells and nestin cells were observed by immunofluorescence staining. After induction of dissociation using 5% fetal bovine serum, positive NF200, NSE and GFAP cells were observed by immunofluorescence staining. CONCLUSION: This is a simplified and efficient method for neonatal rat brain-derived neural stem cell culture and identification.
RESUMO
Spinal infection in the form of tuberculous vertebral osteomyelitis or pyogenic spondylodiscitis is a commonly associated state of an immunodeficient host from various pathologies. For example, secondary infections can be seen following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We report three cases of different forms of spinal infections that occurred as delayed complications to recent COVID-19 infection. The first case is a 60-year-old female who was diagnosed with an epidural abscess presenting with severe back pain and bilateral lower limb weakness. The second case is an elderly male who was diagnosed with L3/L4 spondylodiscitis and presented with predominantly back pain and minimal leg symptom. The final case is a young female who was diagnosed with severe T5 tuberculous spondylitis and presented with a complete sensory and motor deficit from T5 below. All patients showed good improvement after surgery and antibiotic therapy. Patients treated for COVID-19 are at risk of spinal infection development due to multiple pathophysiologies. Treatment of these various forms of spinal infection remains difficult, and we encourage physicians to be vigilant for the development of these complications post COVID-19 infection.
