Eficacia de la mascarilla facial con filtro de partículas N95 y de la mascarilla quirúrgica durante la respiración humana: dos vías para la penetración de partículas.

RESUMENEl nivel de protección ofrecido por las mascarillas con filtro de partículas y las mascarillas se establece considerando el porcentaje de partículas ambientales que penetran dentro del dispositivo de protección. Existen dos vías de penetración: (1) la infiltración a través del sellado facial de la mascarilla y (2) a través del medio filtrante. El objetivo principal de este estudio fue diferenciar el aporte proveniente de cada una de estas dos vías para partículas cuyo tamaño oscila entre 0.03-1 µm en condiciones de respiración reales. Así, mientras se realizaban pruebas de ajuste convencionales, se evaluaron una mascarilla respiratoria autofiltrante N95 y una mascarilla quirúrgica usada comúnmente en entornos de atención médica en 25 sujetos (número coincidente con el último panel de pruebas de ajuste del Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud Laborales). Asimismo, ambas mascarillas fueron evaluadas empleando maniquíes de respiración que imitaban de forma precisa los patrones de respiración registrados previamente en los sujetos evaluados. Posteriormente, se compararon los datos de penetración obtenidos en las evaluaciones realizadas con sujetos humanos y con maniquíes para determinar los diferentes tamaños de partículas, así como los patrones de respiración. Así se determinaron 5,250 valores de penetración específicos correspondientes al ejercicio y el tamaño de las partículas. Para cada valor se calcularon la tasa de infiltración a través del sellado facial de la mascarilla y la tasa de infiltración a través del filtro, con la finalidad de cuantificar los aportes relativos realizados por cada vía de penetración. El número de partículas que penetra mediante infiltración del sellado facial de la mascarilla autofiltrante/mascarilla quirúrgica probadas excedió ampliamente el número de aquellas que lo hacen a través del filtro. Para la mascarilla autofiltrante N95, el exceso fue (en promedio) de un orden de magnitud y se incrementó notablemente al aumentar el tamaño de las partículas (p < 0.001): ∼7 veces mayor para 0,04 µm, ∼10 veces para 0.1 µm y ∼20 veces para 1 µm. En el caso de la mascarilla quirúrgica, la tasa de infiltración a través del sellado facial de la misma con respecto al filtro osciló entre 4.8 y 5.8 y no se vio significativamente afectada por el tamaño de las partículas para la fracción del submicrómetro evaluado. El movimiento facial/corporal tuvo un efecto pronunciado en el aporte relativo de las dos vías de penetración. La intensidad de la respiración y las dimensiones faciales mostraron alguna influencia (aunque limitada). Considerando que la mayoría de las partículas que penetraron ingresaron a través del sellado facial, al desarrollar la mascarilla autofiltrante/mascarilla quirúrgica la prioridad debería ser realizar una adecuación que permitiera eliminar o minimizar la infiltración a través del sellado facial y no mejorar la eficiencia del medio de filtro.

Laboratory evaluation of the particle size effect on the performance of an elastomeric half-mask respirator against ultrafine combustion particles.

OBJECTIVES: This study quantified the particle size effect on the performance of elastomeric half-mask respirators, which are widely used by firefighters and first responders exposed to combustion aerosols. METHODS: One type of elastomeric half-mask respirator equipped with two P-100 filters was donned on a breathing manikin while challenged with three combustion aerosols (originated by burning wood, paper, and plastic). Testing was conducted with respirators that were fully sealed, partially sealed (nose area only), or unsealed to the face of a breathing manikin to simulate different faceseal leakages. Three cyclic flows with mean inspiratory flow (MIF) rates of 30, 85, and 135 L/min were tested for each combination of sealing condition and combustion material. Additional testing was performed with plastic combustion particles at other cyclic and constant flows. Particle penetration was determined by measuring particle number concentrations inside and outside the respirator with size ranges from 20 to 200 nm. RESULTS: Breathing flow rate, particle size, and combustion material all had significant effects on the performance of the respirator. For the partially sealed and unsealed respirators, the penetration through the faceseal leakage reached maximum at particle sizes >100 nm when challenged with plastic aerosol, whereas no clear peaks were observed for wood and paper aerosols. The particles aerosolized by burning plastic penetrated more readily into the unsealed half-mask than those aerosolized by the combustion of wood and paper. The difference may be attributed to the fact that plastic combustion particles differ from wood and paper particles by physical characteristics such as charge, shape, and density. For the partially sealed respirator, the highest penetration values were obtained at MIF = 85 L/min. The unsealed respirator had approximately 10-fold greater penetration than the one partially sealed around the bridge of the nose, which indicates that the nose area was the primary leak site.

Large particle penetration through N95 respirator filters and facepiece leaks with cyclic flow.

The aim of this study was to investigate respirator filter and faceseal penetration of particles representing bacterial and fungal spore size ranges (0.7-4 mum). First, field experiments were conducted to determine workplace protection factors (WPFs) for a typical N95 filtering facepiece respirator (FFR). These data (average WPF = 515) were then used to position the FFR on a manikin to simulate realistic donning conditions for laboratory experiments. Filter penetration was also measured after the FFR was fully sealed on the manikin face. This value was deducted from the total penetration (obtained from tests with the partially sealed FFR) to determine the faceseal penetration. All manikin experiments were repeated using three sinusoidal breathing flow patterns corresponding to mean inspiratory flow rates of 15, 30, and 85 l min(-1). The faceseal penetration varied from 0.1 to 1.1% and decreased with increasing particle size (P < 0.001) and breathing rate (P < 0.001). The fractions of aerosols penetrating through the faceseal leakage varied from 0.66 to 0.94. In conclusion, even for a well-fitting FFR respirator, most particle penetration occurs through faceseal leakage, which varies with breathing flow rate and particle size.

Performance of an N95 filtering facepiece particulate respirator and a surgical mask during human breathing: two pathways for particle penetration.

The protection level offered by filtering facepiece particulate respirators and face masks is defined by the percentage of ambient particles penetrating inside the protection device. There are two penetration pathways: (1) through the faceseal leakage, and the (2) filter medium. This study aimed at differentiating the contributions of these two pathways for particles in the size range of 0.03-1 microm under actual breathing conditions. One N95 filtering facepiece respirator and one surgical mask commonly used in health care environments were tested on 25 subjects (matching the latest National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health fit testing panel) as the subjects performed conventional fit test exercises. The respirator and the mask were also tested with breathing manikins that precisely mimicked the prerecorded breathing patterns of the tested subjects. The penetration data obtained in the human subject- and manikin-based tests were compared for different particle sizes and breathing patterns. Overall, 5250 particle size- and exercise-specific penetration values were determined. For each value, the faceseal leakage-to-filter ratio was calculated to quantify the relative contributions of the two penetration pathways. The number of particles penetrating through the faceseal leakage of the tested respirator/mask far exceeded the number of those penetrating through the filter medium. For the N95 respirator, the excess was (on average) by an order of magnitude and significantly increased with an increase in particle size (p < 0.001): approximately 7-fold greater for 0.04 microm, approximately 10-fold for 0.1 microm, and approximately 20-fold for 1 microm. For the surgical mask, the faceseal leakage-to-filter ratio ranged from 4.8 to 5.8 and was not significantly affected by the particle size for the tested submicrometer fraction. Facial/body movement had a pronounced effect on the relative contribution of the two penetration pathways. Breathing intensity and facial dimensions showed some (although limited) influence. Because most of the penetrated particles entered through the faceseal, the priority in respirator/mask development should be shifted from improving the efficiency of the filter medium to establishing a better fit that would eliminate or minimize faceseal leakage.