Temporary Gastric Stimulation in Patients With Gastroparesis Symptoms: Low-Resolution Mapping Multiple Versus Single Mucosal Lead Electrograms.

BACKGROUND: Cajal cells have a fundamental role in generating slow waves that regulate gastric motility. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for symptomatic treatment of drug refractory gastroparesis. We hypothesized that using two leads will vary from a single lead by providing greater insight of gastric electrical wave propagation, through differences in measured frequency, amplitude, and frequency over amplitude ratio. We also hypothesized that a significant reduction in symptomatic vomiting score is highly predictive in a single lead temporary gastric electrical stimulation. METHODS: A total of 111 patients with drug-refractory gastroparesis were enrolled. Forty-two patients had single lead, while 69 patients had two leads. All recordings measured mean frequency and amplitude in each lead. Patients documented symptoms using standardized symptom scores at baseline and day 5 post-procedure. RESULTS: Single lead patients with initial low mucosal frequency showed an increase from 3.10 to 4.93 (P = 0.0155), while the high frequency group decreased from 5.89 to 5.12 (P = 0.135). Vomiting score decreased significantly among both groups with GES (P = 0.0001). For two leads, the mucosal frequency decreased at the proximal electrode (P = 0.402), and increased at the distal electrode (P = 0.514), neither statistically significant (P = 0.143). Mucosal electrogram amplitude values changed for both proximal, mean decrease of 0.34 mV (P = 0.241), and distal, mean increase of 0.05 mV (P = 0.65) with a mean difference 0.34 mV (P = 0.238). However, mucosal electrogram frequency and amplitudes on day 5 were highly dependent on the baseline values (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the use of single point electrodes, the use of two low-resolution electrodes allows recording gastric electrical wave propagation with greater detail. Low resolution recording appears to be superior to single point recordings, while awaiting practical high-resolution recordings.

MELD Stratified Outcomes Among Recipients With Diabetes or Hypertension: Simultaneous Liver Kidney Versus Liver Alone.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Data are scanty on allocating simultaneous liver kidney (SLK) based on model for end-stage disease (MELD) score. Diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HTN) are frequent in cirrhosis patients. We analyzed transplant recipients with DM and/or HTN to compare MELD-based outcomes of SLK to liver transplantation alone (LTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 13,584 first deceased donor liver transplantation among patients with DM and/or HTN (1530 or 11.2% SLK), MELD score predicted SLK [1.02 (1.01-1.03)]. SLK was beneficial for 5-year patient survival at MELD score ≥43 (78.6% vs. 62.6%, P=0.017), but not at MELD score <29 (74.8% vs. 76.2%, P=0.63). Among 11,405 recipients (976 SLK) at MELD score <29, SLK (n=816) was beneficial compared with 706 LTA [75% vs. 64%, P<0.001; 0.71 (0.55-0.91)] at serum creatinine (SC) ≥2 but not at SC<2 [73% vs. 76%, P=0.32; 0.85 (0.60-1.2)]. Among patients with MELD score 29 to 42, SLK (n=484) and LTA (n=1403) had similar survival [69% vs. 69%, P=0.58; 0.9 (0.7-1.5)]. Among patients with MELD score ≥43, SLK (n=70) was associated with 35% improved patient survival at 5 years compared with 222 LTA [0.65 (0.46-0.93)]. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with DM and/or HTN, SLK is useful at: (a) MELD score <29 and SC≥2 and (b) MELD score ≥43. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings as basis to optimize use of SLK.

Ammonia level at admission predicts in-hospital mortality for patients with alcoholic hepatitis.

OBJECTIVE: Alcoholic hepatitis (AH), a unique clinical syndrome among patients with chronic and active alcohol use, is associated with high short-term mortality. An elevated ammonia level is associated with mortality in patients with acute liver failure; however, its impact in AH has not been well-studied. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on patients admitted to a tertiary-care hospital with the discharge diagnosis of AH. Patients meeting criteria for AH were included in the final data analysis. Multivariate logistic regression models were built to examine the impact of serum ammonia in predicting in-hospital mortality (IHM) and 30-day mortality (TDM). Subgroup analysis was also performed, which was limited to patients who had hepatic encephalopathy. RESULTS: Of the 105 AH patients included, 26 (25%) died during the initial hospitalization. Among the 79 patients who survived initial hospitalization, 30 (39%) died within 30 days. Information about ammonia levels at admission was available for 82 patients. Of these, 25 patients had IHM and significantly higher ammonia level (97 vs. 69 µmol/L, P < 0.01). Among the 57 who survived hospitalization, ammonia levels were not significantly different (71 vs. 67 µmol/L, P = 0.69) in patients with and without TDM. The addition of ammonia to the multivariate regression models including age, sex, cirrhosis, treatment and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score improved the C statistics for IHM from 0.708 to 0.801 and for TDM from 0.756 to 0.766, respectively. These results were identical, even when limited to patients with hepatic encephalopathy. CONCLUSION: AH patients with elevated ammonia levels at admission have higher IHM; however, they do not seem to play a significant role in 30-day mortality for patients who survived hospitalization.

Primary biliary cirrhosis has high wait-list mortality among patients listed for liver transplantation.

Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) have frequent episodes of cholangitis with potential for high mortality while waiting for liver transplantation. However, data on wait-list mortality specific to liver disease etiology are limited. Using United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database (2002-2013), of 81 592 listed patients, 11 284 (13.8%) died while waiting for transplant. Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) patients (N = 3491) compared to PSC (N = 4905) differed with age (56 vs. 47 years), female gender (88% vs. 33%), black race (6% vs. 13%), and BMI (25 vs. 27), P < 0.0001 for all. A total of 993 (11.8%) patients died while waiting for the transplant list. Using competing risk analysis controlling for baseline recipient factors and accounting for receipt of liver transplantation (LT), PBC compared to patients with PSC had higher overall and 3-month wait-list mortality (21.6% vs. 12.7% and 5.0% vs. 2.9%, respectively, Gray's test P < 0.001), [1.25 (1.07-1.47)]. Repeat analysis including all etiologies showed higher wait-list mortality for PBC compared to most etiologies, except for patients listed for diagnosis of alcoholic liver disease (ALD) + hepatitis C virus (HCV). Patients with PBC have high mortality while waiting for liver transplantation. These novel findings suggest that patients with PBC listed for LT may be considered for model for end-stage disease (MELD) exception points.

Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis is the Most Rapidly Growing Indication for Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplantation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Frequency of liver transplantation (LT) is increasing in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with good post-transplant outcomes. Similar data on simultaneous liver kidney (SLK) transplants are limited. METHODS: United Network for Organ Sharing database (2002-2011) queried for deceased donor first LT for primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, or alcoholic cirrhosis (group I), NASH, and cryptogenic cirrhosis with body mass index greater than 30 (group II), and hepatitis C virus with and without alcohol, hepatitis B virus, and hepatocellular carcinoma (group III). RESULTS: Of 38 533 LT (9495, 3665, and 25 383 in groups I-III, respectively), about 5.6% (N = 2162) received SLK with 584 (6.2%), 320 (8.7%), and 1258 (5%) in groups I-III, respectively. The SLK performed for group II increased from 6.3% in 2002 to 2003 to 19.2% in 2010 to 2011. Similar trends remained unchanged in group I (26.1 to 26.6%) and decreased in group III (67.6 to 54.5%). Five-year outcomes were similar comparing group II versus group I for liver graft (78 vs 74%, P = 0.14) and patient survival (81 vs 76%, P = 0.07). In contrast, kidney graft outcome was worse for group II (70 vs 79%, P = 0.002). Risk of kidney graft loss was over 1.5-fold higher among group II SLK recipients compared to group I after controlling for recipient characteristics. Estimated glomerular filtration rate remained lower in group II compared with group I at various time points after SLK transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The NASH is the most rapidly growing indication for SLK transplantation with poor renal outcomes. Studies are needed to examine mechanisms of these findings and develop strategies to improve renal outcomes in SLK recipients for NASH.