Do We Still Need Aspirin in Coronary Artery Disease?

Aspirin has for some time been used as a first-line treatment for acute coronary syndromes, including ST-elevation myocardial infarction, for secondary prevention of established coronary disease, and for primary prevention in patients at risk of coronary artery disease. Although aspirin has been in use for decades, the available evidence for its efficacy largely predates the introduction of other drugs, such as statins and P2Y12 inhibitors. Based on recent trials, the recommendation for aspirin use as primary prevention has been downgraded. In addition, P2Y12 inhibitors given as a single antiplatelet therapy have been associated with a lower incidence of bleeding than dual antiplatelet therapy in combination with aspirin in patients with stable and unstable coronary artery disease. The aim of this review is to discuss the role of aspirin considering the available evidence for primary prevention, secondary prevention for stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes, and after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass revascularization.

Sex Differences in the Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes of Suspected Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Meeting Rapid Rule-Out Criteria.

(1) Background: patients who meet current rapid rule-out criteria for myocardial infarction (MI) are considered low risk, yet their management remains nebulous, especially among women. We aimed to examine sex differences in the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of patients meeting the rapid rule-out criteria. (2) Methods: by simulating application of the rapid rule-out MI criteria, we analyzed consecutively triaged men and women with suspected NSTE-ACS who had high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) values that met criteria (n = 11,477), in particular, those who were admitted (n = 3775). (3) Results: men constituted ~55% of triaged patients who met the rule-out criteria, whether admitted or discharged. Men were more likely to be admitted (33.7% vs. 31.9%, p = 0.04), more commonly with hs-cTnT values between level of detection (LOD, 5 ng/ml) and the 99th percentile (59.4% of all admissions vs. 40.5% for women), whereas women were more likely to be admitted with values < level of blank (LOB, 3 ng/mL; 22.9% vs. 9.2% for men). Thirty-day mortality (1 man and 1 woman) and in-hospital MI (9 men vs. 1 woman) were uncommon among admitted patients, yet resource utilization during 3-4 hospitalization days was substantial for both sexes, with men undergoing coronary angiography (6.8% vs. 2.9%) and revascularization (3.4% vs. 1.1%) more commonly. Long-term survival for both men and women, whether admitted or discharged, was significantly worse for hs-cTnT values between LOD and the 99th percentile, even after adjusting for age and cardiovascular comorbidities. (4) Conclusions: reporting actual hs-cTnT values < 99th percentile allows for better risk stratification, especially for women, possibly closing the sex gap.

Suspected Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome meeting rapid rule-out criteria: resource utilization, diagnostic yield, and clinical outcomes of hospital admission.

AIMS: Many patients with suspected non-ST-elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are admitted, even those with initial high-sensitivity cardiac troponins (hs-cTn) values who meet rapid rule-out criteria for myocardial infarction (MI). We examined the clinical outcomes, resource utilization, and diagnostic yield of suspected NSTE-ACS patients, who presented with hs-cTnT values meeting these criteria but were nevertheless hospitalized. METHODS AND RESULTS: Applying the 2020 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) rapid rule-out MI criteria, we identified consecutive patients with an initial value of hs-cTnT <5 ng/L or an initial value of ≥5 ng/L but <14 ng/L (99th percentile) and a small increment in a subsequent test, who were nevertheless admitted. The majority (85.4%) of patients presented to the emergency department (ED) with suspected NSTE-ACS had an initial hs-cTnT <99th percentile. We examined 3775 admitted patients out of 11 477 patients who were triaged and met MI rule-out criteria. Only 0.32% (12 patients) of admitted patients experienced index MI or overall death within 30 days. Resource utilization in terms of ED stay, hospital stay, noninvasive and invasive tests was substantial, yet revascularization was uncommon (2.5%). Multivariate adjustment for age, gender, and baseline cardiovascular risk factors demonstrates similar survival of admitted vs. discharged patients (P = 0.88). Initial hs-cTnT even below the 99th percentile provided a prognostic stratification for long term mortality. CONCLUSION: Our findings support a policy of ED discharge of suspected NSTE-ACS patients meeting rapid MI rule-out criteria and subsequent ambulatory evaluation, sparing resource-consuming admissions. In-hospital and ensuing prognosis were better with lower initial hs-cTnT values.

Preoperative evaluation of pulmonary hypertension in lung transplant candidates: echocardiography versus right heart catheterization.

BACKGROUND: Right heart catheterization (RHC) and echocardiography are both routinely used for pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) assessment in lung transplantation (LT) candidates, although this is not mandated by current guidelines. We aimed to explore the performance of echocardiographic PASP as an indicator of pulmonary hypertension in LT candidates, in order to assess the necessity of RHC. METHODS: From a retrospective registry of 393 LT candidates undergoing RHC and echocardiography during 2015-2019, patients were assessed for the presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH), defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) above 20 mmHg, according to two methods-echocardiography and RHC. The primary outcome was the correlation between the PASP estimated by echocardiography to that measured by RHC. Secondary outcomes were the prediction value of the echocardiographic evaluation and its accuracy. RESULTS: The mean value of PASP estimated by echocardiography was 49.5 ± 20.0 mmHg, compared to 42.5 ± 18.0 mmHg measured by RHC. The correlation between the two measurements was moderate (Pearson's correlation: r = 0.609, p < 0.01). Echocardiography PASP measurements were moderately discriminative to diagnose PH, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% CI 0.66-0.77). Echocardiographic overestimation of PASP of more than 10 mmHg was found in 35.0% of the patients, and underestimation was found in 11.6% of the patients. CONCLUSION: In the pre-surgical evaluation of LT candidates, echocardiographic estimation of PASP had moderate correlation and limited accuracy compared to the PASP measured by RHC. We thus recommend performing routine RHC to all LT candidates, regardless of the echocardiographic estimation of PASP.

Ticagrelor versus Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Analysis from the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing in-hospital percutaneous coronary intervention treated with prasugrel versus ticagrelor. METHODS: Among 7,233 patients enrolled to the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS) between 2010 and 2018, we identified 1,126 eligible patients treated with prasugrel and 817 with ticagrelor. Comparison between the groups was performed separately in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, propensity score matched (PSM) STEMI patients, and non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) patients. RESULTS: In-hospital complication rates, including rates of stent thrombosis, were not significantly different between groups. In PSM STEMI patients, 30-day re-hospitalization rate (p < 0.05), 30-day MACE (the composite of death, MI, stroke, and urgent revascularization, p = 0.006), and 1-year mortality rates (p = 0.08) were higher in the ticagrelor group compared to the prasugrel group; in NSTE-ACS patients, outcomes were not associated with drug choice. In Cox regression analysis applied on the entire cohort, prasugrel was associated with lower 1-year mortality in STEMI patients but not in NSTE-ACS patients (p for interaction 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to ticagrelor, prasugrel was associated with superior clinical outcomes in STEMI patients, but not in NSTE-ACS patients.

Characteristics Associated with Upper-Range Doses of Beta-Blockers and Angiotensin-Renin Inhibitors in Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are frequently treated with sub-optimal doses of angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitors (ACE-Is), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and beta blockers (BBs). OBJECTIVES: To determine factors associated with attaining upper-range doses in patients with HFrEF. METHODS: We examined treatment in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% in a community-based, dedicated heart-failure clinic. Upper-range doses were defined as ≥ 75% of target recommended doses by heart failure society guidelines. RESULTS: The majority of the 215 patients were men (82%); median age at presentation 73 years (interquartile range [IQR] 65-78) and LVEF of 30% (IQR 25-35%). Following the up-titration program, 41% and 35% of patients achieved upper-range doses of ACE-Is/ARBs and BBs, respectively. Higher body mass index (BMI) was the only parameter found to be associated with achieving upper-range doses of ACE-I/ARBs (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.05-1.22, P = 0.001). More patients achieved this target as BMI increased, with a sharp decline in the highest obesity category (BMI ≥ 40 m2/kg). Attaining upper-range doses of BBs was associated with pre-existing diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR 2.6, 95%CI 1.34-5.19, P = 0.005); women were associated with attaining lower BBs doses (OR 0.34, 95%CI 0.13-0.90, P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Achieving upper-range doses of ACE-Is/ARBs and BBs in HFrEF outpatients in a treatment up-titration program were associated with greater BMI and DM, respectively. These findings may serve as benchmarks for up-titration programs.

Inferior ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Presenting When Urgent Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Unavailable: Should We Adhere to Current Guidelines?

The pivotal studies that led to the recommendations for emergent reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were conducted for the most part over 25 years ago. At that time, contemporary standard treatments including aspirin, statin, and even anticoagulation were not commonly used. The 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines and the 2017 European Society of Cardiology guidelines give a class I recommendation (with the level of evidence A) for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in patients with STEMI and ischemic symptoms of less than 12 h. However, if the patient presents to a hospital without pPCI capacity, and it is anticipated that pPCI cannot be performed within 120 min of first medical contact, fibrinolytic therapy is indicated (if there are no contraindications) (class I indication, level of evidence A). Our review of the pertinent literature shows that the current recommendation for inferior STEMI is based on the level of evidence lower than A. We can consider level B even C, supporting the recommendation for fibrinolytic therapy if pPCI is not available for inferior STEMI.

Comparison of Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Presenting With Typical Versus Atypical Symptoms.

Although typical chest pain is an important clinical feature required for diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), many patients present with atypical complaints. The full extent and implication of this presentation is largely unknown. The study aim was to evaluate possible relations and temporal trends between presenting symptoms and outcomes in patients with ACS. Data was obtained from the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey on patients presenting with typical chest pain versus atypical complaints, including dyspnea, nonspecific chest pain, palpitations or other. Temporal trends analysis examined the early (2000 to 2006) versus the late (2008 to 2016) period. During 2000 to 2016, 14,722 patients with ACS were enrolled; 11,508 (79%) presented with typical chest pain and 3,214 (21%) with atypical complaints. Patients with atypical complaints were older, majority female, and had more co-morbidities (p <0.001 for each). The 30-day major adverse cardiac events, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality rate were significantly higher in patients presenting with atypical complaints, (18% vs 13.5%, 7.7% vs 3.6%, and 15.6% vs 7.5%, respectively, p <0.001 for each). Although 1-year mortality decreased significantly over the years in patients with typical chest pain, there were no significant changes in patients who presented with atypical complaints. These results were consistent in STEMI and non-STE-ACS patients. In conclusion, ACS patients who present with atypical complaints have a less favorable outcome compared with patients who present with typical chest pain, and failed to show an improvement in mortality over the past 2 decades. Identification and utilization of guideline-recommended therapies in these high-risk patients may improve their future outcome.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer presenting with acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available regarding the optimal management of patients with cancer in the acute myocardial infarction (AMI) setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied consecutive patients with AMI included in a national registry (years 2010, 2016) with the diagnosis of past or active malignancy and followed them for 1 year. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 2937 cancer-naive patients and 152 patients with cancer, of whom 35% presented with active malignancies. Compared with cancer-naive patients, patients with cancer were older, with female predominance, and presented more often with a history of hypertension and chronic kidney disease (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The rate of ST-elevation AMI was comparable (P=0.067). GRACE score more than 140 was more common in the cancer group (P<0.001). Most patients with cancer were referred to coronary angiography, though less than cancer-naive patients (87 vs. 93%; P=0.004). The rate of percutaneous coronary intervention was similar (P=0.265). Propensity score matching demonstrated similar rates of in-hospital complications between groups, and no mortality or major cardiac adverse event differences were noted at 30 days. Moreover, short-term mortality was similar between patients with active versus past malignancies, and between patients with solid and nonsolid tumors. However, cancer in patients with AMI was found to predict an increased mortality risk at 1 year by multivariable analysis (hazard ratio=2.52; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with cancer and AMI have a more complicated clinical presentation, yet their short-term prognosis is similar to cancer-naive patients. Nevertheless, 1-year outcome is worse.

Comparison of 18-Month Outcomes of Ambulatory Patients With Reduced (≤40%) Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Treated in a Community-Based, Dedicated Heart Failure Clinic Versus Treated Elsewhere.

We sought to examine the management and outcomes of ambulatory patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction in a community-based, dedicated clinic. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% were actively solicited to attend a community-based, dedicated clinic. Eligible patients who chose to decline constituted our control group. Of 552 patients with LVEF ≤40% (median age 73 years and median LVEF 35%), 304 (55%) agreed to attend the clinic. Patients with worse New York Heart Association class were more likely to attend the clinic (odds ratio 2.07 [1.45, 2.95], p <0.001), whereas women were more likely to decline (odds ratio 0.63 [0.42, 0.93], p <0.022). During 18 months of follow-up, patients in the dedicated clinic significantly improved their functional capacity (56% New York Heart Association 3 to 4 at baseline vs 27% at follow-up, p <0.001) and LVEF (35% [interquartile range 25, 35] at baseline vs 35% (interquartile range 30, 40) at follow-up, p <0.001). In comparison with patients managed routinely, patients treated in a dedicated clinic achieved better guideline-recommended pharmacological treatment (65% vs 85% receiving ß blockers, p <0.001, 65% vs 82% receiving renin-angiotensin inhibitors, p = 0.0006, 31% vs 45% receiving mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, p <0.001). During follow-up, electrical device implantation was similar (6% vs 7% of dedicated-HF-clinic patients, p = 0.700). Furthermore, overall survival was better in patients treated in the clinic (log rank p = 0.0006), even after censoring the first 4 months to account for potential bias (log rank p = 0.0232). In conclusion, management in a community-based, dedicated clinic compared with routine management was associated with augmented guideline-recommended treatment and improved survival.

Guideline-Recommended Therapies and Clinical Outcomes According to the Risk for Recurrent Cardiovascular Events After an Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Background Patients who have had an acute coronary syndrome ( ACS ) are at increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events; however, paradoxically, high-risk patients who may derive the greatest benefit from guideline-recommended therapies are often undertreated. The aim of our study was to examine the management, clinical outcomes, and temporal trends of patients after ACS stratified by the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score for secondary prevention, a recently validated clinical tool that incorporates 9 clinical risk factors. Methods and Results Included were patients with ACS enrolled in the biennial Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Surveys ( ACSIS ) between 2008 and 2016. Patients were stratified by the TIMI risk score for secondary prevention to low (score 0-1), intermediate (2), or high (≥3) risk. Clinical outcomes included 30-day major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, stent thrombosis, urgent revascularization) and 1-year mortality. Of 6827 ACS patients enrolled, 35% were low risk, 27% were intermediate risk, and 38% were high risk. Compared with the other risk groups, high-risk patients were older, were more commonly female, and had more renal dysfunction and heart failure ( P<0.001 for each). High-risk patients were treated less commonly with guideline-recommended therapies during hospitalization (percutaneous coronary intervention) and at discharge (statins, dual-antiplatelet therapy, cardiac rehabilitation). Overall, high-risk patients had higher rates of 30-day major adverse cardiac events (7.2% low, 8.2% intermediate, and 15.1% high risk; P<0.001) and 1-year mortality (1.9%, 4.6%, and 15.8%, respectively; P<0.001). Over the past decade, utilization of guideline-recommended therapies has increased among all risk groups; however, the rate of 30-day major adverse cardiac events has significantly decreased among patients at high risk but not among patients at low and intermediate risk. Similarly, the 1-year mortality rate has decreased numerically only among high-risk patients. Conclusions Despite an improvement in the management of high-risk ACS patients, they are still undertreated with guideline-recommended therapies. Nevertheless, the outcome of high-risk patients after ACS has significantly improved in the past decade, thus they should not be denied these therapies.

Calculated Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients with Apical Versus Nonobstructive Nonapical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

There are limited and conflicting data regarding the prognosis of patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) and their risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD). We used data from a single tertiary center for comparing the clinical course and the calculated risk for SCD in patients with nonobstructive apical HC (apical HC) versus patients with nonobstructive, nonapical HC (NONA HC). The 5-year SCD risk was calculated based on the HC risk-SCD tool. A total of 109 patients were included in the cohort of whom 44 (40%) patients were diagnosed with apical HC. The majority of patients were males with a median age at diagnosis of 40 years (interquartile range 26, 59 years). Patients with apical HC had a significant lower calculated 5-year risk for SCD compared with patients with NONA HC (2.65 ± 2.2% vs 4.00 ± 3.5%, respectively, p = 0.017), primarily due to a lower incidence of familial SCD (20% vs 43% respectively, p = 0.014). Only 9% of patients with apical HC had a calculated risk of >6% (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recommended), as compared with 23% of patients with NONA HC. During a median follow-up of 1,018 days (interquartile range 546, 1449 days), apical HC patients tended to develop less malignant ventricular arrhythmia episodes compared with NONA HC patients (0% vs 7.7%, respectively, p = 0.060). In conclusion, apical HC patients have a lower calculated risk of SCD compared with NONA HC patients, mainly due to a lower incidence of family history of SCD. Thus, apical HC should be considered a form of HC less prone to SCD.

Impact of Self-Reported Family History of Premature Cardiovascular Disease on the Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndrome (from the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israel Survey [ACSIS] 2000 to 2013).

Family history of premature cardiovascular disease (FHpCVD) is a well-established risk factor for development of coronary artery disease. However, little is known about the impact of FHpCVD on the outcome of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We therefore aimed to evaluate the outcomes of ACS patients grouped by the presence and/or absence of FHpCVD. All patients ≤65 at admission who had an ACS event and were enrolled in the national ACS Israel Survey registry from 2000 to 2013 were included. Patients were grouped by the presence or absence of self-reported FHpCVD. Nearest neighbor propensity score matching was applied to create an evenly matched cohort of patients. Outcomes included 30-day MACE (defined as the composite of death, unstable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and urgent revascularization) and its individual components. Of 7,173 ACS patients, 33.9% reported FHpCVD. These patients were younger, with lower prevalence of diabetes, previous cerebrovascular and kidney diseases, but had higher prevalence of smoking and hyperlipidemia (p <0.001 for each). The propensity score-matching cohort included 1,793 pairs of evenly matched patients. The rate of 30-day MACE did not differ in the groups, as well as 1-year mortality (2.4% vs 2.2%, with vs without FHpCVD, respectively). During long-term follow-up (median 7.6 years), mortality rate was lower in the FHpCVD group (hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence intervals 0.69 to 0.99). In conclusion, we observed no differences in short- and intermediate-term outcomes based on the presence and/or absence of FHpCVD. However, patients with FHpCVD had better long-term survival.

The association between eGFR in the normal or mildly impaired range and incident cadiovascular disease: Age and sex analysis.

BACKGROUND: Worse renal function, even in the normal or mildly impaired range, is associated with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD). Whether this association exists in both sexes across all ages is not known. METHODS: A population based cohort of individuals >22 years with no prior CVD and with an eGFR 60-130 ml/min/1.73 m2. eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI formula. Incident CVD was defined as either myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, coronary revascularization, or cerebrovascular event. Incident CVD was examined separately in men and women in 3 age-groups (young, 22-40 years; middle-aged, 41-60 years; and elderly, ≥61 years), during a median follow-up of 96.0 months. RESULTS: Among 1,341,400 individuals (57% women, mean age 49.2 ±â€¯16.6 years), men had more incident CVD as compared to women (34,968 vs. 23,515 total incident CVD) in all age-groups (0.6% vs. 0.2% in young; 6.2% vs. 2.0% in middle-aged; 13.4% vs. 8.4% in elderly, respectively). After adjustment for CVD risk factors, an increment of 10 units in eGFR was independently associated with a decrease of 5.4%, 3.4% and 5.4% in incident CVD in young, middle-aged and elderly men (p < 0.001 for each) and a decrease of 6.3%, 3.4% and 6.8% in the same age-groups in women (p < 0.001 for each). There was no significant age-sex interaction in the association between eGFR and incident CVD. CONCLUSION: Although incident CVD differs in men and women, as well as in different age-groups, a higher eGFR even in the normal or mildly impaired range is associated with lesser incident CVD in men and women of all ages.

Incidence and Prognosis of Pericarditis After ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey 2000 to 2013 Registry Database).

There are scarce contemporary data regarding the incidence and prognosis of early postmyocardial infarction pericarditis (PMIP). Thus, we retrospectively analyzed 6,282 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) enrolled with known PMIP status in the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey 2000 to 2013 registry. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event, stent thrombosis, or revascularization. The secondary outcomes were mortality and length of stay during the acute hospitalization. Overall, 76 patients with STEMI had PMIP (1.2%). PMIP incidence gradually decreased from 170 per 10,000 in 2000 to 110 per 10,000 in 2013, respectively (35% reduction, p for trend = 0.035). Patients with PMIP were younger (median 58.0 vs 61.0; p = 0.045), had less hypertension, higher cardiac biomarkers, and more frequently reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (87.0% vs 67.0%; p = 0.001). Patients with PMIP had longer time to reperfusion (225 minutes vs 183 minutes; p = 0.016) and length of stay (7.0 vs 5.0 days; p < 0.001). The composite end point occurred similarly in patients with and without PMIP (10.5% vs 13.2%, respectively). There was no significant difference in 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year survival. In conclusion, PMIP is a relatively rare complication of STEMI in the coronary reperfusion era, portends worse short-term but not long-term outcomes, and is associated with bigger infarct size.

Does colchicine decrease the rate of recurrence of acute idiopathic pericarditis treated with glucocorticoids?

BACKGROUND: The traditional treatment of acute pericarditis includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) or glucocorticoids. The addition of colchicine has been found to reduce the rate of recurrences. Glucocorticoids, however, may attenuate this effect, although the available data are limited. We examined the impact of colchicine on the rate of recurrence of acute idiopathic pericarditis pretreated with prednisone. METHODS: The frequency of recurrence in patients hospitalized for acute idiopathic pericarditis in a tertiary medical center in 2004-2014 who were treated with glucocorticoids or with non-steroidal therapy was assessed from the computerized hospital database. A retrospective design was used. RESULTS: The cohort included 199 patients aged 18-86 years. Sixty-two (31%) were treated with prednisone, 42 with colchicine and 20 without, and 133 with non-steroidal therapy; in 4 patients, therapy was not detailed. Follow-up ranged from 13 to 147 months (median, 48 months). Fifty-three patients (26.6%) experienced at least one recurrence of pericarditis. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients who received prednisone and colchicine (17/42, 40.5%) than in patients who received NSAIDs or aspirin and colchicine (8/44, 18.2%, p=0.03) or any non-steroidal therapy (30/133, 22.6%, p=0.03). There was no difference between the rate of recurrence in patients who were treated with prednisone alone (5/20, 25%) and those treated with NSAIDs or aspirin and colchicine or with any non-steroidal therapy (p=NS). Baseline characteristics and duration of follow-up were similar in patients with and without recurrence. Hospital stay was longer in patients treated with prednisone alone as compared to patients treated with prednisone and colchicine. There were no other differences in baseline characteristics between these groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of colchicine to prednisone in patients admitted for acute idiopathic pericarditis does not reduce the risk of recurrence. This finding suggests that prednisone blunts the salutary effects of colchicine.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate within the normal or mildly impaired range and incident non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Results from a population-based cohort study.

Background Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, in particular in the significant renal impairment range (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2), is associated with incident atrial fibrillation. This association is less established within the normal or mildly impaired estimated glomerular filtration rate range. Methods Using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) estimated glomerular filtration rate formula, we identified ambulatory adults (>22 years old) without rheumatic heart disease or prosthetic valves and with 60 ml/min/1.73 m210 m patient-years of follow-up (∼75% <60 years old, ∼57% females), >65,000 individuals had ≥1 atrial fibrillation event (incident atrial fibrillation rate 5.1% and 5.8% excluding or including prior cardiovascular disease, or 49 and 55 per 10,000 patient-years, respectively). In both cohorts, individuals with versus without incident atrial fibrillation had lower mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (∼83 versus 95 ml/min/1.73 m2). Adjusting for age, gender, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus, overall a 10 ml/min/1.73 m2 decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate was independently associated with a mean increase in incident atrial fibrillation of 1.5% and 2.4% in the cohorts excluding or including prior cardiovascular disease, respectively ( p < 0.001 for both). However, a graded association between lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and atrial fibrillation was observed in the 90-130 ml/min/1.73 m2 range, whereas a blunted association was observed in the 60-90 ml/min/1.73 m2 range. Conclusion Within the 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 < estimated glomerular filtration rate < 130 ml/min/1.73 m2 range, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate is independently associated with incident non-valvular atrial fibrillation in adults without prior atrial fibrillation, mainly attributed to a graded association within the 90-130 ml/min/1.73 m2 range.

Prevalence of Carotid Artery Disease among Ambulatory Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant carotid artery disease (CaAD) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with worse cardiac and neurologic outcomes. The reported prevalence and risk factors for concomitant CaAD in CAD patients varied among previous studies. OBJECTIVES: To examine these factors in ambulatory patients with CAD and well-documented cholesterol levels treated with cholesterol-lowering medications. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from 325 unselected patients with CAD (89 women, mean age 68.8 ± 9.9 years) undergoing routine evaluation at the coronary clinic of our hospital. RESULTS: The low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) was < 100 mg/dl in 292 patients (90%). Age at onset of CAD symptoms was 59.4 ± 10.8 years. Carotid stenosis ≥ 50% was seen in 83 patients (25.5%) and between 30% and 49% in 55 patients (17%) (duplex method). Carotid stenosis was significantly associated with hypertension (P = 0.032), peripheral arterial disease (P = 0.002) and number of coronary arteries with ≥ 50% stenosis (P = 0.002), and showed a borderline association with age at CAD onset (P = 0.062) and diabetes mellitus (P = 0.053). On linear regression analysis, independent predictors of CaAD were peripheral vascular disease (OR 3.186, 95% CI 1.403-7.236, P = 0.006), number of coronary arteries with ≥ 50% stenosis (OR 1.543, 95% CI 1.136-2.095, P = 0.005), and age at CAD onset (OR 1.028, 95% CI 1.002-1.054, P = 0.003). None of the variables studied predicted freedom from CaAD. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid atherosclerosis is very common in stable ambulatory patients with CAD regularly taking statins. The risk is higher in patients with peripheral arterial disease, a greater number of involved coronary arteries, and older age at onset of CAD.