Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hypertens Res ; 44(2): 232-238, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32901155

RESUMO

We designed a retrospective cohort study using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a national inpatient database for acute-care inpatients in Japan, to examine whether recent global diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia, phenotypes of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and features of the disease are useful as predictors of placental abruption and whether other risk factors are associated with the onset of placental abruption. A total of 85,858 hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of HDP who gave birth during hospitalization between July 2010 and March 2018 were included in this study. We examined the associations between the occurrence of placental abruption after hospitalization and several factors, including gestational age (GA) at placental abruption onset, HDP subtypes, GA on admission, maternal age, body mass index, smoking, multiple pregnancy, prelabor rupture of membranes, diabetes mellitus, emergency admission by ambulance, and consciousness, using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Placental abruption occurred in 541 patients (0.63%) after hospital admission, and the occurrence increased acutely after 32 weeks GA. A decrease in abruption was significantly associated with maternal BMI on admission (≥30 kg/m2; odds ratio [OR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.70) and multiple pregnancy (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.18-0.46). An increase in abruption was associated with earlier GA on admission (<34 weeks' GA; OR, 3.77; 95% CI, 3.13-4.53) and emergency admission by ambulance (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.09-1.65). Individual features of severe PE showed no significant associations with the occurrence of abruption. In conclusion, HDP at an earlier GA was suggested to be a risk factor for placental abruption, and we recommend hospitalization and careful management of such patients to improve their prognosis.


Assuntos
Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez , Descolamento Prematuro da Placenta/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez/epidemiologia , Pacientes Internados , Japão/epidemiologia , Fenótipo , Placenta , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Surg J (N Y) ; 7(Suppl 1): S7-S10, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35036542

RESUMO

Temporary cross-clamping of the infrarenal abdominal aorta to reduce bleeding during hysterectomy following cesarean section in patients with placenta previa-accreta is a relatively simple procedure; therefore, it can be an option when intravascular balloon catheter placement is impossible or encountered massive bleeding of the unexpected placenta accreta.

3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 25(2): 152-7, 2007 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17276803

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a clinical prediction rule to distinguish pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) from acute appendicitis in women of childbearing age. METHODS: We reviewed medical records over a 4-year period of female patients of childbearing age who had presented with abdominal pain at an urban emergency department and had either appendicitis (n = 109) or PID (n = 72). A prediction rule was developed by use of recursive partitioning based on significant factors for the discrimination. RESULTS: The significant factors to favor PID over appendicitis were (1) no migration of pain (odds ratio [OR], 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-11.5), (2) bilateral abdominal tenderness (OR, 16.7; 95% CI, 5.3-50.0), and (3) absence of nausea and vomiting (OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 2.8-24.8). The prediction rule could rule out appendicitis from PID with sensitivity of 99% (95% CI, 94-100%) when classified as a low-risk group by the following factors: (1) no migration of pain, (2) bilateral abdominal tenderness, and (3) no nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSION: We developed a prediction rule for childbearing-aged women presenting with acute abdominal pain to distinguish acute appendicitis from PID based on 3 simple, clinical features: migration of pain, bilateral abdominal tenderness, and nausea and vomiting. Prospective validation is needed in other settings.


Assuntos
Apendicite/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/diagnóstico , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Apendicite/complicações , Apendicite/terapia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/complicações , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/terapia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...