Protocol modifications reduce risk of delayed pericardial effusions after vein of Marshall ethanol infusion: follow-up from the Maine experience.

BACKGROUND: While ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (VOM) as an adjunct to atrial fibrillation ablation has shown promise, adoption has been limited by the technical expertise required, unclear antiarrhythmic mechanism, and complication risk. Delayed pericardial effusions have been associated with ethanol infusion into the VOM in prior studies. Very little is known about how the procedural approach itself can impact the risk of delayed effusions. We sought to understand the incidence and influence of procedural technique on complications including delayed pericardial effusions from VOM ethanol infusion at a large single medical center. METHODS: A total of 275 atrial ablation cases wherein VOM ethanol infusion was attempted were identified from the time of the program's inception in 2019 at Maine Medical Center (Portland, ME) until October of 2023. Cases were classified into phase I cases (early experience) and phase II cases (later experience) based upon temporal programmatic changes in the ethanol dose and infusion rate as well as the use of routine VOM venography. Procedural details and complications were adjudicated from the medical record. RESULTS: The overall VOM ethanol infusion success was 91.4%. Nine complications (3.3%) occurred in eight patients (2.9% of patients). These were more frequent in phase I (5.8%) compared to phase II (1.3%, p = 0.047). This difference was driven by a difference in delayed presentations of tamponade, which occurred in four patients in phase I (3.3%) and in no patients in phase II (0%, p = 0.037). Twelve-month estimated atrial arrhythmia freedom did not differ between groups (73.8% phase I vs 70.4% phase II, p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: In our single-center experience, adjustments to the procedural approach with lower ethanol infusion rate and dosage, combined with utilizing selective VOM venography, associated with a lowering of complication rates and in particular, delayed pericardial tamponade.

History of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Affects Static Balance under Complex Multisensory Manipulations.

A recent study in active-duty military in the Coast Guard suggested that lifetime experience with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) was associated with subtle deficits in postural control when exposed to multi-sensory discordance (i.e., rotating visual stimulation). The present study extended postural assessments to veterans recruited from the community. Service veterans completed the Defense Veteran Brain Injury Center TBI Screening Tool, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist (PCL-5), and Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI). Postural control was assessed using a custom-designed, virtual-reality-based device, which assessed center of pressure sway in response to six conditions designed to test sensory integration by systematically combining three visual conditions (eyes open, eyes closed, and rotating scene) with two somatosensory conditions (firm or foam surface). Veterans screening positive for lifetime experience of mTBI (mTBI+) displayed similar postural sway to veterans without a lifetime experience of mTBI (mTBI-) on basic assessment of eyes open or closed on a firm and foam surface. mTBI+ veterans displayed greater sway than mTBI- veterans in response to rotating visual stimuli while on a foam surface. Similar to previous research, degree of sway was affected by the number of lifetime experiences of mTBI. Increased postural sway was not related to PTSD, NSI, or balance-specific symptom expression. In summary, veterans who experienced mTBI over their lifetime exhibited dysfunction in balance control as revealed by challenging conditions with multi-sensory discordance. These balance-related signs were independent of self-reported balance-related symptoms or other symptom domains measured by the NSI, which can provide a method for exposing otherwise covert dysfunction long after the experience of mTBI.

Enhanced Acquisition and Retention of Conditioned Eyeblink Responses in Veterans Expressing PTSD Symptoms: Modulation by Lifetime History of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Enhanced acquisition of eyeblink conditioning is observed in active duty military and veterans expressing PTSD symptoms (PTSD+) and those expressing temperamental vulnerabilities to develop PTSD after traumatic experiences, such as behaviorally inhibited temperament. There is a growing literature showing persistent cerebellar abnormalities in those experiencing mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI+) as well as linkages between mTBI and PTSD. With the dependency of eyeblink conditioning on cerebellar processes, the impact of mTBI on eyeblink conditioning in veterans expressing PTSD is unknown. The present study assessed eyeblink conditioning in veterans during two sessions separated by 1 week. With a focus on the accelerated learning of veterans expressing PTSD, training utilized a protocol which degrades learning through interspersing conditioned stimulus (CS) exposures amongst delay-type trials of CS and unconditional stimulus (US) co-terminating trials. Faster acquisition of the eyeblink conditioned responses (CR) was observed in PTSD during Week 1. The Week 2 assessment revealed an interaction of mTBI and PTSD, such that asymptotic performance of PTSD+ was greater than PTSD- among mTBI- veterans, whereas these groups did not differ in mTBI+ veterans. To further examine the relationship between enhanced sensitivity to acquire eyeblink conditioning and PTSD, cluster analysis was performed based on performance across training sessions. Those with enhanced sensitivity to acquire eyeblink conditioned responses expressed more PTSD symptoms, which were specific to Cluster C symptoms of avoidance, in addition to greater behavioral inhibition. These results support the continued investigation of the conditioned eyeblink response as a behavioral indicator of stress-related psychopathology.

Toward an assessment of escape/avoidance coping in depression.

Models of animal behavior suggest that anxiety and major depressive disorder (MDD) may be characterized by different profiles of escape and avoidance behavior. However, the literature on coping strategies fails to distinguish between avoidance and escape coping patterns, instead grouping escape behaviors into the larger category of avoidant coping. We argue that investigating both escape and avoidance coping behavior in those with anxiety and depression may reveal distinct behavioral profiles, whereas the current conceptual framework has failed to find significant differences coping style.