Surgical outcomes of anterior cerebellopontine angle meningiomas using the anterior transpetrosal approach compared with the lateral suboccipital approach.

BACKGROUND: Anterior transpetrosal approach (ATPA) and lateral suboccipital approach (LSO) are the major surgical approaches for cerebellopontine angle (CPA) meningiomas. Particularly, anterior CPA meningiomas are challenging lesions to be treated surgically. To date, only a few studies have directly compared the outcomes of both approaches focusing on the anterior CPA meningiomas. METHODS: For the comparative analysis, anterior CPA meningiomas that were eligible for both APTA and LSO were collected in our hospital from April 2005 to March 2017. Anterior CPA meningiomas targeted for this study were defined as follows: (1) without cavernous sinus, clivus, and middle cranial fossa extension, (2) the posterior edge is 1 cm behind the posterior wall of the internal auditory canal, and (3) the inferior edge is above the jugular tuberculum. Based on these criteria, the operative outcomes of 17 patients and 13 patients who were operated via ATPA and LSO were evaluated. RESULTS: The complication rate of the LSO group was significantly higher than that of the ATPA group (30.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.033). The removal rate did not differ between the ATPA and LSO groups (97.35% vs. 99.23%, p = 0.12). The operative time was significantly shorter in the LSO group than in the ATPA group (304.3 min vs. 405.8 min, p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Although the LSO is more widely used for CPA meningiomas, ATPA is also considered for these anterior CPA meningiomas.

A Comparative Study Between Traditional Microscopic Surgeries and Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Skull Base Chordomas.

BACKGROUND: Skull base chordomas (SBCs) are rare clinically aggressive neoplasms, developing local recurrences after surgical resection. Although SBCs have traditionally been resected by craniotomy or microscopic transsphenoidal surgery (TSS), the recent development of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has revolutionized treatment strategies through minimally invasive techniques. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes after traditional microsurgeries or EEAs for SBCs. METHODS: The present retrospective study investigated 66 patients with primary SBCs who underwent surgery between 1977 and 2019. Resection was performed via EEA in 17 cases, craniotomy in 23, transoral approach in 8, TSS in 12, staged surgery in 4, and others in 2. The median follow-up period for progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.5 months. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in preoperative tumor volume or resection rate among these approaches. The incidence of postoperative cranial nerve palsy was significantly lower in EEA than that in craniotomy (P < 0.05). Although total resection was observed in 4 cases of EEA expanding into the superior and inferior part of the clivus, no cases of transoral approach or TSS achieved total resection for both parts. No significant difference in PFS was found among these approaches. Multivariate analysis showed that being female and the absence of radiotherapy were significantly associated with shorter PFS (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). The resection rate was not associated with PFS. CONCLUSIONS: EEA is a less invasive surgical approach for SBCs. The development of surgical instruments and postoperative radiotherapy will further improve patients' outcomes.