Synthesis of Sulfides and Persulfides Is Not Impeded by Disruption of Three Canonical Enzymes in Sulfur Metabolism.

Reactive sulfur species, or persulfides and polysulfides, such as cysteine hydropersulfide and glutathione persulfide, are endogenously produced in abundance in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, including mammals. Various forms of reactive persulfides occur in both low-molecular-weight and protein-bound thiols. The chemical properties and great supply of these molecular species suggest a pivotal role for reactive persulfides/polysulfides in different cellular regulatory processes (e.g., energy metabolism and redox signaling). We demonstrated earlier that cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase (CARS) is a new cysteine persulfide synthase (CPERS) and is responsible for the in vivo production of most reactive persulfides (polysulfides). Some researchers continue to suggest that 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (3-MST), cystathionine ß-synthase (CBS), and cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE) may also produce hydrogen sulfide and persulfides that may be generated during the transfer of sulfur from 3-mercaptopyruvate to the cysteine residues of 3-MST or direct synthesis from cysteine by CBS/CSE, respectively. We thus used integrated sulfur metabolome analysis, which we recently developed, with 3-MST knockout (KO) mice and CBS/CSE/3-MST triple-KO mice, to elucidate the possible contribution of 3-MST, CBS, and CSE to the production of reactive persulfides in vivo. We therefore quantified various sulfide metabolites in organs derived from these mutant mice and their wild-type littermates via this sulfur metabolome, which clearly revealed no significant difference between mutant mice and wild-type mice in terms of reactive persulfide production. This result indicates that 3-MST, CBS, and CSE are not major sources of endogenous reactive persulfide production; rather, CARS/CPERS is the principal enzyme that is actually involved in and even primarily responsible for the biosynthesis of reactive persulfides and polysulfides in vivo in mammals.

PCR-mediated One-day Synthesis of Guide RNA for the CRISPR/Cas9 System.

Nowadays, CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) and the CRISPR-associated protein (Cas9) system play a major role in genome editing. To target the desired sequence of the genome successfully, guide RNA (gRNA) is indispensable for the CRISPR/Cas9 system. To express gRNA, a plasmid expressing the gRNA sequence is typically constructed; however, construction of plasmids involves much time and labor. In this study, we propose a novel procedure to express gRNA via a much simpler method that we call gRNA-TES (gRNA-transient expression system). This method employs only PCR, and all the steps including PCR and yeast transformation can be completed within 1 day. In comparison with the plasmid-based gRNA delivery system, the performance of gRNA-TES is more effective, and its total time and cost are significantly reduced.

Systematic approach for assessing whether undeletable chromosomal regions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are required for cell viability.

Previously, we identified 49 undeletable chromosomal regions harboring only non-essential genes in the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We proposed that there might be unknown synthetic lethal combinations of genes present in such undeletable regions of the genome. In this study, we chose four of the smallest undeletable chromosomal regions among the 49 and performed extensive further analyses to narrow down the gene-pairs responsible for lethality by replacing sub-regions in various combinations with a DNA module comprising the CgLEU2 marker. Although the methodology was different from previous study, interestingly the results revealed that not only the sub-regions but also the entire region was replaceable. To solve the apparent discrepancy between previous and present results, we further conducted additional analysis including investigation of suppressor mutation and mini-chromosome loss assay through the construction of mini-chromosome harboring two particular chromosomal regions with marked with URA3 marker by employing 5-FOA system. Based upon careful observation on the phenotype of colony formation on 5-FOA medium by spot test, we came to an important conclusion that particular chromosomal regions harboring only non-essential genes can be categorized into three classes, i.e., essential, non-essential and intrinsically essential. Intrinsically essential region is defined as appearance of papillae after mini-chromosome loss which implicates that the region is essential but compensatable against cell lethality. Our present study indicates that prudent and multiple approaches as performed in this study are needed to judge whether a particular chromosomal region of the S. cerevisiae genome is essential, non-essential or intrinsically essential but compensatable.

CRISPR-PCDup: a novel approach for simultaneous segmental chromosomal duplication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In our previous study, a novel genome engineering technology, PCR-mediated chromosome duplication (PCDup), was developed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that enabled the duplication of any desired chromosomal region, resulting in a segmental aneuploid. From one round of transformation, PCDup can duplicate a single chromosomal region efficiently. However, simultaneous duplication of multiple chromosomal regions is not possible using PCDup technology, which is a serious drawback. Sequential duplication is possible, but this approach requires significantly more time and effort. Because PCDup depends upon homologous recombination, we reasoned that it might be possible to simultaneously create duplications of multiple chromosomal regions if we could increase the frequency of these events. Double-strand breaks have been shown to increase the frequency of homologous recombination around the break point. Thus, we aimed to integrate the genome editing tool CRISPR/Cas9 system, which induces double-strand breaks, with our conventional PCDup. The new method, which we named CRISPR-PCDup increased the efficiency of a single duplication by up to 30 fold. CRISPR-PCDup enabled the simultaneous duplication of long chromosomal segments (160 kb and 200 kb regions). Moreover, we were also able to increase the length of the duplicated chromosome by up to at least 400 kb, whereas conventional PCDup can duplicate up to a maximum of 300 kb. Given the enhanced efficiency of chromosomal segmental duplication and the saving in both labor and time, we propose that CRISPR-PCDup will be an invaluable technology for generating novel yeast strains with desirable traits for specific industrial applications and for investigating genome function in segmental aneuploid.

CRISPR-PCD and CRISPR-PCRep: Two novel technologies for simultaneous multiple segmental chromosomal deletion/replacement in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Genome manipulation, especially the deletion or replacement of chromosomal regions, is a salient tool for the analysis of genome function. Because of low homologous recombination activity, however, current methods are limited to manipulating only one chromosomal region in a single transformation, making the simultaneous deletion or replacement of multiple chromosomal regions difficult, laborious, and time-consuming. Here, we have developed two highly efficient and versatile genome engineering technologies, named clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-PCR-mediated chromosomal deletion (PCD) (CRISPR-PCD) and PCR-mediated chromosomal replacement (CRISPR-PCRep), that integrate the CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) genome editing system (CRISPR/Cas9) into, respectively, the PCD method for chromosomal deletion and our newly developed PCRep method for chromosomal replacement. Integration of CRISPR induces double strand breaks to activate homologous recombination, and thus enhances the efficiency of deletion by PCD and replacement by PCRep, enabling multiple chromosomal regions to be manipulated simultaneously for the first time. Our data show that CRISPR-PCD can delete two internal or terminal chromosomal regions, while CRISPR-PCRep can replace triple chromosomal regions simultaneously in a single transformation. Colony PCR analysis of structural alterations showed that triple replacement of four different sets of chromosomal regions was successful in 83%-100% of transformants analyzed. These novel genome engineering technologies, which greatly reduce time and labor for genome manipulation, will provide powerful tools to facilitate the simultaneous multiple deletion and replacement of chromosomal regions, enabling the rapid analysis of genome function and breeding of useful industrial yeast strains.

gRNA-transient expression system for simplified gRNA delivery in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) system is one of the most powerful tools for genome engineering. However, some of the steps are laborious, reducing its usability. In this study, we have developed a simplified method, called the guide RNA-transient expression system (gRNA-TES), to deliver gRNA in yeast. In gRNA-TES, a DNA fragment containing the promoter and gRNA is prepared by two simple PCR steps and co-transformed with a DNA module into the host strain; all steps including PCR steps and yeast transformation are completed within 5-6 h in a single day, in contrast to conventional plasmid-based gRNA delivery systems, which require at least 3-4 days to construct and verify the gRNA-expressing plasmids. The performance of gRNA-TES was evaluated by the replacement of 150-kb, 200-kb, 300-kb, 400-kb, and 500-kb regions of yeast chromosome 4 with a DNA module. Increased numbers of transformants with a high frequency of expected replacement of even the 500-kb region were obtained with gRNA-TES as compared with transformation without gRNA-TES. In addition, the integrity of the replaced region was verified in 67%-100% of transformants tested by colony PCR. We believe that gRNA-TES will vastly increase the accessibility of CRISPR/Cas9 technology to biologists and biotechnologists by offering a simple, fast, and cost-effective tool to deliver gRNA in genome engineering. Furthermore, it might be applied to plant and animal systems if appropriate gene promoters are incorporated in the technology.