Using electrical impedance tomography to characterize lung impairment of children with primary ciliary dyskinesia: A pilot cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: In children with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), measures more sensitive than spirometry are needed to characterize underlying pulmonary impairment. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a promising noninvasive method for monitoring the distribution of lung ventilation, and it does not require patient collaboration. We aimed to provide an assessment of the feasibility and clinical usefulness of EIT in characterizing lung impairment in children with PCD, compared to spirometry and multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBWN2 ) test. METHODS: Children and adolescents with PCD underwent MBWN2 test as first respiratory assessment, followed by EIT monitoring and spirometry during outpatient follow-up. RESULTS: We included 12 out of 16 individuals regularly followed at our clinic. A total of 41.7% (5/12) showed abnormal forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ), whereas 11/12 (91.7%) had abnormal ventilation inhomogeneity measured with MBWN2 test. Using EIT, the global inhomogeneity (GITOT ) index showed moderate to strong correlation with FEV1 (ρ = -0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.87 to 0.02) and ranged from 37 to 44, with the highest inhomogeneity detected in the dorsal right quadrant. GITOT was moderately correlated with RV/TLC %predicted (ρ = 0.38, 95% CI: -0.17 to 0.74), while we detected a weak correlation between GITOT and lung clearance index (ρ = 0.29, 95% CI: -0.45 to 0.82). CONCLUSION: EIT appears promising as a noninvasive technique to characterize ventilation distribution in children with PCD, thus providing a complementary assessment to static and dynamic lung function measures of PCD disease.

Relapsing pediatric non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas: The impact of routine imaging surveillance on early detection and post-relapse survival.

PURPOSE: The chances of patients with relapsing pediatric non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) being cured are limited. This retrospective single-institutional study examines the potential role of routine surveillance imaging for detecting recurrent tumor, and its impact on post-relapse survival. METHODS: The analysis concerned 86 patients < 21 years old with relapsing NRSTS treated from 1985 to 2020. Clinical findings, treatment modalities and survival were analyzed, comparing patients whose relapse was first suspected from symptoms (symptomatic group) with those whose relapse was detected by radiological surveillance (imaging group). RESULTS: Tumor relapses were identified from clinical symptoms in 49 cases and on routine imaging in 37. Time to relapse was similar in the two groups. Routine imaging detected 6/32 local relapses and 31/48 distant relapses (and 79% of the cases of lung metastases). Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 34.3% for the symptomatic group, and 24.0% for the imaging group (p-value 0.270). In patients with lung metastases at relapse, the 5-year OS was statistically better for the imaging group, that is, 25.8% versus 0% for the symptomatic group (p-value 0.044). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to explore the role of surveillance imaging in pediatric NRSTS. Judging from our findings, the value of routine scanning of primary sites seems limited, while radiological surveillance may help to detect lung metastases, improving survival for this patient category. The potentially negative effects of periodic radiological exams should be considered in deciding the optimal follow-up for patients off therapy.

Therapeutic Strategies for COVID-19 Lung Disease in Children.

The novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has milder presentation in children than in adults, mostly requiring only supportive therapy. The immunopathogenic course of COVID-19 can be divided in two distinct but overlapping phases: the first triggered by the virus itself and the second one by the host immune response (cytokine storm). Respiratory failure or systemic involvement as Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) requiring intensive care are described only in a small portion of infected children. Less severe lung injury in children could be explained by qualitative and quantitative differences in age-related immune response. Evidence on the best therapeutic approach for COVID-19 lung disease in children is lacking. Currently, the approach is mainly conservative and based on supportive therapy. However, in hospitalized children with critical illness and worsening lung function, antiviral therapy with remdesivir and immunomodulant treatment could be considered the "therapeutic pillars."