Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
ANZ J Surg ; 78(7): 579-82, 2008 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18593414

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The management of recurrent choledocholithiasis today remains as challenging as in the pre-endoscopic era. Between 2 and 7% of affected patients have historically required surgical intervention for the treatment of recurrent or retained choledocholithiasis and of these, as many as 24% develop biliary complications. To avoid surgery, repeated endoscopic management of the problem has been suggested. In this study, we evaluate our policy of repeated endoscopic management of recurrent primary bile duct stones. METHODS: This study examined a cohort of nine patients identified from a prospective database with recurrent choledocholithiasis. Demographic, clinical and investigative details were recorded and data were analysed. Complications were determined from a review of the patient's file. RESULTS: There were nine patients and 66 procedures were carried out. Mean age at time of first endoscopy was 70.1 years (36-91 years). Three patients were of male sex (33.3%). The mean number of endoscopies carried out per patient was 7.3 (3-13). Failure to completely clear the duct occurred in 36.4% of all endoscopies. There were no periprocedural complications. CONCLUSION: Repeated endoscopic stone extraction by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography when required is a safe policy. However, this technique will only provide temporary relief from primary duct stones and repeated endoscopic treatment, again safe, will be required.


Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Cálculos Biliares/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva
2.
ANZ J Surg ; 75(6): 396-8, 2005 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15943724

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) has been used in managing acute cholecystitis in the setting of a patient with severe comorbidities where emergency cholecystectomy would carry significant mortality. The present study aims to assess the role, efficacy and complications of PC in acute cholecystitis. METHODS: Retrospective review of case notes of patients who underwent PC at Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Australia between July 1997 and December 2002. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (mean age 75 years; range 50-96) underwent PC. Indications for PC were significant comorbidities (n = 6), failure of conservative treatment (n = 4), bile duct malignancy (n = 2), sepsis of unknown origin (n = 2), patient declined surgery (n = 1) and local perforation (n = 1). Technical success rate was 94%. Clinical response to PC was observed in 15 patients. Overall mortality was 18% (3/16) with one death caused by PC failure. Interval cholecystectomy was performed in seven patients (44%). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a useful alternative means of treating non-resolving acute cholecystitis in circumstances where emergency surgery is hazardous. It also offers effective palliation in patients not suitable for subsequent surgery.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia/métodos , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...