Glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonists versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in ischemic strokes with diabetes 2.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cardiovascular outcome trials demonstrate that glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), whereas dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) have not shown cardiovascular benefits. We compared acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with T2D treated with either a GLP-1RA or DPP-4i prior to the index stroke. METHODS: This national cohort study included AIS patients with T2D from 2017 to 2020 in Denmark who were users of a GLP-1RA or DPP-4i. To be categorized as a user, we required at least 12 months of exposure and no concurrent treatment with another newer glucose-lowering medication during the last 3 months prior to the index stroke. GLP-1RA users were compared to users of DPP-4i while adjusting for the calendar year of index stroke, age, sex, comorbidity, and socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: The study included 1567 AIS events with T2D; 593 were users of GLP-1RA and 974 of DPP-4i. The absolute risk of a very severe stroke was 2.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-3.7) in GLP-1RA users and 6.1% (95% CI = 4.6-7.7) in DPP-4i users. The corresponding adjusted risk ratio (aRR) of GLP-1RA versus DPP-4i was 0.49 (95% CI = 0.24-1.00). The aRRs of 30-day and 365-day mortality were 0.55 (95% CI = 0.32-0.94) and 0.72 (95% CI = 0.53-0.98), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of a very severe stroke as well as the 30-day and 365-day poststroke mortality rates were lower among the AIS patients with comorbid T2D receiving GLP-1RA prior to the index stroke compared to those receiving DPP-4i. Hence, GLP-1RA may improve stroke outcomes in comparison with DPP-4i.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with ischemic stroke - A nationwide study.

AIMS: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a risk factor for ischemic stroke (IS) and associated with an adverse prognosis. Both stroke and diabetes care has evolved substantially during the last decade. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of T2D among IS patients along with time trends in the risk profile, use of glucose-lowering medications, quality-of-care and clinical outcomes, including stroke severity; length-of-stay; mortality, readmission and recurrent stroke in a large national cohort. METHODS: Registry-based cohort study including all IS events in Denmark from 2004 to 2020. IS with co-morbid T2D were compared to IS without diabetes while adjusting for age, sex, stroke severity, co-morbidity and socio-economic factors. RESULTS: The study included 169,262 IS events; 24,479 with co-morbid T2D. The prevalence of T2D in IS increased from 12.0% (2004-2006) to 17.0% (2019-2020). The adjusted absolute 30-day mortality risk in IS with T2D decreased from 9.9% (2004-2006) to 7.8% (2019-2020). The corresponding adjusted risk ratios (aRR) were 1.22 95% confidence interval (1.09-1.37) and 1.29 (1.11-1.50), respectively. The aRR of 365-day mortality was in 2004-2006: 1.20 (1.12-1.29) and in 2019-2020: 1.34 (1.22-1.47). The 30- and 365-day readmissions rates were also consistently higher in IS with T2D. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of T2D in IS increased over time. The 30- and 365-day mortality rates decreased over the time-period but were consistently higher in IS with co-morbid T2D. Readmissions were also higher in IS with T2D. This highlights an urgent need for strategies to further improve the prognosis in IS patients with co-morbid T2D.

Patient-Centered Outcomes in a Randomized Trial Investigating a Multimodal Prevention Program After Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Stroke: The INSPiRE-TMS Trial.

BACKGROUND: The INSPiRE-TMS trial (Intensified Secondary Prevention Intending a Reduction of Recurrent Events in Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke Patients) investigated effects of a multicomponent support program in patients with nondisabling stroke or transient ischemic attack. Although secondary prevention targets were achieved more frequently in the intensified care group, no significant differences were seen in rates of recurrent major vascular events. Here, we present the effects on prespecified patient-centered outcomes. METHODS: In a multicenter trial, we randomized patients with modifiable risk factors either to the intensified or conventional care alone program. Intensified care was provided by stroke specialists and used feedback and motivational interviewing strategies (≥8 outpatient visits over 2 years) aiming to improve adherence to secondary prevention targets. We measured physical fitness, disability, cognitive function and health-related quality of life by stair-climbing test, modified Rankin Scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and European Quality of Life 5 Dimension 3 Level during the first 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Of 2072 patients (mean age: 67.4years, 34% female) assessed for the primary outcome, patient-centered outcomes were collected in 1,771 patients (877 intensified versus 894 conventional care group). Physical fitness improved more in the intensified care group (mean between-group difference in power (Watt): 24.5 after 1 year (95% CI, 5.5-43.5); 36.1 after 2 years (95% CI, 13.1-59.7) and 29.6 (95% CI, 2.0-57.3 after 3 years). At 1 year, there was a significant shift in ordinal regression analysis of modified Rankin Scale in favor of the intensified care group (common odds ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.03-1.47]) but not after 2 (odds ratio, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.96-1.41]) or 3 years (odds ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.95-1.43]) of follow-up. However, Montreal Cognitive Assessment and European Quality of Life 5 Dimension scores showed no improvement in the intensified intervention arm after 1, 2, or 3 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients of the intensified care program group had slightly better results for physical fitness and modified Rankin Scale after 1 year, but none of the other patient-centered outcomes was significantly improved. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01586702.

A support programme for secondary prevention in patients with transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke (INSPiRE-TMS): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with recent stroke or transient ischaemic attack are at high risk for a further vascular event, possibly leading to permanent disability or death. Although evidence-based treatments for secondary prevention are available, many patients do not achieve recommended behavioural modifications and pharmaceutical prevention targets in the long-term. We aimed to investigate whether a support programme for enhanced secondary prevention can reduce the frequency of recurrent vascular events. METHODS: INSPiRE-TMS was an open-label, multicentre, international randomised controlled trial done at seven German hospitals with acute stroke units and a Danish stroke centre. Patients with non-disabling stroke or transient ischaemic attack within 2 weeks from study enrolment and at least one modifiable risk factor (ie, arterial hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, or smoking) were included. Computerised randomisation was used to allocate patients (1:1) either to the support programme in addition to conventional care or to conventional care alone. The support programme used feedback and motivational interviewing strategies with eight outpatient visits over 2 years aiming to improve adherence to secondary prevention targets. The primary outcome was the composite of major vascular events consisting of stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and vascular death, assessed in the intention-to-treat population (all patients who underwent randomisation, did not withdraw study participation, and had at least one follow-up). Outcomes were assessed at annual follow-ups using time-to-first-event analysis. All-cause death was monitored as a safety outcome. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01586702. FINDINGS: From Aug 22, 2011, to Oct 30, 2017, we enrolled 2098 patients. Of those, 1048 (50·0%) were randomly assigned to the support programme group and 1050 (50·0%) patients were assigned to the conventional care group. 1030 (98·3%) patients in the support group and 1042 (99·2%) patients in the conventional care group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The mean age of analysed participants was 67·4 years and 700 (34%) were women. After a mean follow-up of 3·6 years, the primary outcome of major vascular events had occurred in 163 (15·8%) of 1030 patients of the support programme group and in 175 (16·8%) of 1042 patients of the conventional care group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·92, 95% CI 0·75-1·14). Total major vascular event numbers were 209 for the support programme group and 225 for the conventional care group (incidence rate ratio 0·93, 95% CI 0·77-1·12; p=0·46) and all-cause death occurred in 73 (7·1%) patients in the support programme group and 85 (8·2%) patients in the conventional care group (HR 0·85, 0·62-1·17). More patients in the support programme group achieved secondary prevention targets (eg, in 1-year-follow-up 52% vs 42% [p<0·0001] for blood pressure, 62% vs 54% [p=0·0010] for LDL, 33% vs 19% [p<0·0001] for physical activity, and 51% vs 34% [p=0·0010] for smoking cessation). INTERPRETATION: Provision of an intensified secondary prevention programme in patients with non-disabling stroke or transient ischaemic attack was associated with improved achievement of secondary prevention targets but did not lead to a significantly lower rate of major vascular events. Further research is needed to investigate the effects of support programmes in selected patients who do not achieve secondary prevention targets soon after discharge. FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Pfizer, and German Stroke Foundation.

Effects of centralizing acute stroke services: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of centralizing the acute stroke services in the Central Denmark Region (CDR). METHODS: The CDR (1.3 million inhabitants) centralized acute stroke care from 6 to 2 designated acute stroke units with 7-day outpatient clinics. We performed a prospective "before-and-after" cohort study comparing all strokes from the CDR with strokes in the rest of Denmark to discover underlying general trends, adopting a difference-in-differences approach. The population comprised 22,141 stroke cases hospitalized from May 2011 to April 2012 and May 2013 to April 2014. RESULTS: Centralization was associated with a significant reduction in length of acute hospital stay from a median of 5 to 2 days with a length-of-stay ratio of 0.53 (95% confidence interval 0.38-0.75, data adjusted) with no corresponding change seen in the rest of Denmark. Similarly, centralization led to a significant increase in strokes with same-day admission (mainly outpatients), whereas this remained unchanged in the rest of Denmark. We observed a significant improvement in quality of care captured in 11 process performance measures in both the CDR and the rest of Denmark. Centralization was associated with a nonsignificant increase in thrombolysis rate. We observed a slight increase in readmissions at day 30, but this was not significantly different from the general trend. Mortality at days 30 and 365 remained unchanged, as in the rest of Denmark. CONCLUSIONS: Centralizing acute stroke care in the CDR significantly reduced the length of acute hospital stay without compromising quality. Readmissions and mortality stayed comparable to the rest of Denmark.

Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale to Predict Large Artery Occlusion: Design and Comparison With Other Scales.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We designed and validated a simple prehospital stroke scale to identify emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) in patients with acute ischemic stroke and compared the scale to other published scales for prediction of ELVO. METHODS: A national historical test cohort of 3127 patients with information on intracranial vessel status (angiography) before reperfusion therapy was identified. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) items with the highest predictive value of occlusion of a large intracranial artery were identified, and the most optimal combination meeting predefined criteria to ensure usefulness in the prehospital phase was determined. The predictive performance of Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity (PASS) scale was compared with other published scales for ELVO. RESULTS: The PASS scale was composed of 3 NIHSS scores: level of consciousness (month/age), gaze palsy/deviation, and arm weakness. In derivation of PASS 2/3 of the test cohort was used and showed accuracy (area under the curve) of 0.76 for detecting large arterial occlusion. Optimal cut point ≥2 abnormal scores showed: sensitivity=0.66 (95% CI, 0.62-0.69), specificity=0.83 (0.81-0.85), and area under the curve=0.74 (0.72-0.76). Validation on 1/3 of the test cohort showed similar performance. Patients with a large artery occlusion on angiography with PASS ≥2 had a median NIHSS score of 17 (interquartile range=6) as opposed to PASS <2 with a median NIHSS score of 6 (interquartile range=5). The PASS scale showed equal performance although more simple when compared with other scales predicting ELVO. CONCLUSIONS: The PASS scale is simple and has promising accuracy for prediction of ELVO in the field.

Bypassing primary stroke centre reduces delay and improves outcomes for patients with large vessel occlusion.

OBJECTIVE: In large-vessel occlusion, endovascular therapy is superior to medical management alone in achieving recanalisation. Reducing time delays to revascularisation in patients with large-vessel occlusion is important to improving outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A campaign was implemented in the Central Denmark Region targeting the identification of patients with large-vessel occlusion for direct transport to a comprehensive stroke centre. Time delays and outcomes before and after the intervention were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 476 patients (153 pre-intervention and 323 post-intervention) were included. They were treated with either intravenous tissue plasminogen activator or endovascular treatment (alone or in combination with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator). Endovascular therapy patients' median system delay was reduced from 234 to 185 min (adjusted relative risk delay 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.93)). The in-hospital delay was the main driver with an adjusted relative risk delay of 0.76 (confidence interval: 0.62-0.94), while pre-hospital delay was almost significantly reduced with an adjusted relative delay of 0.86 (confidence interval: 0.71-1.04). This was achieved without increasing the intravenous tissue plasminogen activator-treated patients' delay. Significantly more patients treated with endovascular therapy in the post-interventional period achieved functional independence (62% versus 43%), corresponding to an adjusted odds ratio of 3.08 (95% confidence interval: 1.08-8.78). CONCLUSION: Direct transfer of patients with suspected large-vessel occlusion to a comprehensive stroke centre leads to shorter treatment times for endovascular therapy patients and is, in turn, associated with an increase in functional independence. We recorded no adverse effects on intravenous tissue plasminogen activator treatment times or outcome.

Effect of nicotine and tobacco administration method on the mechanical properties of healing bone following closed fracture.

We previously showed different effects of tobacco and nicotine on fracture healing, but due to pump reservoir limits, maximum exposure period was 4 weeks. To allow flexibility in pre- and post-fracture exposure periods, the objective of this study was to compare a new oral administration route for nicotine to the established pump method. Four groups were studied: (1) pump saline, (2) pump saline + oral tobacco, (3) pump saline/nicotine + oral tobacco, and (4) pump saline + oral nicotine/tobacco. Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 84) received a transverse femoral fracture stabilized with an intramedullary pin 1 week after initiating dosing. After 3 weeks, no difference was found in torsional strength or stiffness between oral nicotine/tobacco or pump nicotine + tobacco, while energy absorption with oral nicotine/tobacco was greater than pump nicotine + tobacco (p < 0.05). Compared to saline control, strength for oral nicotine/tobacco was higher than control (p < 0.05), and stiffnesses for pump nicotine + tobacco and oral nicotine/tobacco were higher than control (p < 0.05). No differences in energy were found for either nicotine-tobacco group compared to saline control. Mean serum cotinine (stable nicotine metabolite) was different between pump and oral nicotine at 1 and 4 weeks, but all groups were in the range of 1-2 pack/day smokers. In summary, relevant serum cotinine levels can be reached in rats with oral nicotine, and, in the presence of tobacco, nicotine can influence mechanical aspects of fracture healing, dependent on administration method. Caution should be exercised when comparing results of fracture healing studies using different methods of nicotine administration.