Optimizing and validating a pediatric screening tool to more efficiently test and identify children living with HIV.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a screening tool to improve testing efficiency and increase case finding of children living with HIV. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Between November 2020 and September 2021, children 18 months to 14 years presenting at outpatient departments in 30 health facilities in Zambia were administered a 14-question pediatric HIV screening tool and then tested for HIV. Data were analyzed using a randomly extracted 'validation' dataset and multivariable logistic regression to determine the highest performing and optimal number of screening questions. The final tool was then evaluated in the 'test' dataset. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for both datasets. The final tool was then also implemented in 12 additional facilities to determine operational feasibility and uptake. RESULTS: A total of 9902 children were included in the final analysis. HIV prevalence was 1.3%. Six questions were significantly associated with HIV-positivity. The optimal screening cutoff score was to answer 'yes' to one or more of the six questions; using this cutoff sensitivity was 92.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 85.7-96.7%] and specificity was 62.9% (95% CI 61.9-64%). In the test dataset, the same tool had a sensitivity of 84.6% (95% CI 65.1-95.6%) and specificity of 64.6% (95% CI 62.4-66.7%). Uptake was 89%. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show sensitivity and acceptable specificity in a six-question validated HIV screening tool. Implementing this screening tool in settings where universal testing is not feasible should more efficiently accelerate identification of children living with HIV (CLHIV) and their timely initiation onto life-saving drugs.

Preferences for services in a patient's first six months on antiretroviral therapy for HIV in South Africa and Zambia (PREFER): research protocol for a prospective observational cohort study.

Background: For patients on HIV treatment in sub-Saharan Africa, the highest risk for loss from care remains the first six months after antiretroviral (ART) initiation, when patients are not yet eligible for differentiated service delivery (DSD) models that offer lower-burden, patient-centred care and thus improve treatment outcomes. To reduce early disengagement from care, the PREFER study will use a sequential mixed-methods approach to describe the characteristics, needs, concerns, and preferences of patients in South Africa and Zambia 0-6 months after ART initiation or re-initiation. Protocol: PREFER is an observational, prospective cohort study of adults on ART for ≤6 months at 12 public healthcare facilities in Zambia and 18 in South Africa. Its objective is to describe and understand the needs and preferences of initiating and re-initiating ART clients to inform the design of DSD models for the early HIV treatment period, improve early treatment outcomes, and distinguish the barriers encountered by naïve patients from those facing re-initiators. It has four components: 1) survey of clients 0-6 months after ART initiation (identify characteristics and preferences of clients starting ART); 2) follow up through routinely collected medical records for <24 months after enrollment (describe resource utilization and patterns and predictors of engagement in care); 3) focus group discussions and discrete choice experiment (explore reported barriers to and facilitators of retention); and 4) in South Africa only, collection of blood samples (assess the prevalence of ARV metabolites indicating prior ART use). Conclusions: PREFER aims to understand why the early treatment period is so challenging and how service delivery can be amended to address the obstacles that lead to early disengagement from care. It will generate information about client characteristics and preferences to help respond to patients' needs and design better strategies for service delivery and improve resource allocation going forward.