Early experience of seven hepatocellular carcinoma cases treated with regorafenib.

Regorafenib became second-line treatment for the patients with sorafenib refractory. In our study, two patients could not continue regorafenib for its adverse effects. It was suggested that appropriate use criteria of regorafenib should be observed and manage adverse effects earlier.

Advanced liver fibrosis effects on the response to sofosbuvir-based antiviral therapies for chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Sustained virological response (SVR) rates for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients have drastically improved with the use of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies; however, a small minority of patients still fails to eradicate the virus. We analyzed factors associated with SVR in DAA therapy and the effect of age and liver fibrosis on treatment response. METHODS: Nine hundred and eighteen patients with chronic HCV infection were treated with 24 weeks of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DCV + ASV) or 12 weeks of sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir (SOF + LDV), ombitasvir, paritaprevir plus ritonavir (OMB + PTV + r) or sofosbuvir plus ribavirin (SOF + RBV). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with SVR. The effect of age and liver fibrosis on SVR was analyzed. RESULTS: The overall SVR rate was 95.4% (876 of 918 patients), and rates by DAA regimen were 93.4%, 95.7%, 100%, and 95.0% in DCV + ASV-treated, SOF + LDV-treated, OMB + PTV + r-treated, and SOF + RBV-treated patients, respectively. Patients older than 75 years achieved a similar SVR rate with those aged 75 years or younger (96.4% and 94.8%, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified absence of DAA therapy history (odds ratio [OR], 3.868 for presence; P = 0.002) and FIB-4 index of less than 3.25 (OR, 5.042 for ≥3.25; P = 0.001) as independent predictors for SVR. SVR rates were significantly lower in patients with FIB4 index of 3.25 or more compared with those with less than 3.25, especially in sofosbuvir-based therapies such as SOF + LDV-treated or SOF + RBV-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Both older and younger patients respond similarly to DAA therapy. Advanced liver fibrosis affects the virological response to sofosbuvir-based therapy.

Comparison of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy between 5-fluorouracil-based continuous infusion chemotherapy and low-dose cisplatin monotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) between 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based continuous infusion chemotherapy and low-dose cisplatin (CDDP) monotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Patients were grouped according to HAIC regimen (5-FU group, n = 317/CDDP group, n = 66). A two-to-one match was created using propensity score analysis (5-FU group, n = 102/CDDP group, n = 51). After matching, response rate (RR) and adverse events as primary end-points, and survival and progression-free survival as secondary end-points, were analyzed. RESULTS: In the analysis of primary end-points, the RR in the 5-FU group was significantly higher than in the CDDP group (32.4% vs. 15.7%, P = 0.033). In patients with a Child-Pugh (CP) score of 5-7, the RR in the 5-FU group was significantly higher than that in the CDDP group (36.1% vs. 15.4%, P = 0.020). In those with a CP score of 8-9, there was no significant difference in RR between the two groups (15.8% vs. 16.6%, P = 1.000). The reservoir system-related complications were 9.8% in the 5-FU group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events between the two matched groups (P > 0.05). In terms of secondary end-points, the median survival time was 9.1 and 8.7 months for the 5-FU and CDDP groups, respectively (P = 0.4917). Progression-free survival was 3.9 months for the 5-FU group and 4.9 months for the CDDP group (P = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: 5-Fluorouracil-based continuous infusion chemotherapy could be suitable for advanced HCC patients with a CP score of 5-7 considering the treatment response.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy followed by sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HICS 55): an open label, non-comparative, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), evidence is unclear as to whether hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) or sorafenib is superior. We performed a prospective, open-label, non-comparative phase II study to assess survival with HAIC or HAIC converted to sorafenib. METHODS: Fifty-five patients were prospectively enrolled. Patients received HAIC as a second course if they had complete response, partial response, or stable disease (SD) with an alpha fetoprotein (AFP) ratio < 1 or a des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) ratio < 1. Patients were switched to sorafenib if they had SD with an AFP ratio > 1 and a DCP ratio > 1 or disease progression. The primary endpoint was the 1-year survival rate. Secondary endpoints were the 2-year survival rate, HAIC response, survival rate among HAIC responders, progression-free survival, and adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 55 patients in the intent-to-treat population, the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 64.0 and 48.3%, respectively. After the first course of HAIC, one (1.8%) patient showed complete response, 13 (23.6%) showed partial response, 30 (54.5%) had SD, and 10 (18.1%) patients had progressive disease. Twenty-three patients (41.8%) had SD with AFP ratios < 1 or DCP ratios < 1, and 7 (12.7%) had SD with AFP ratios > 1 and DCP ratios > 1. Thirty-seven patients (68.5%) were responders and 17 (30.9%) were non-responders to HAIC. In responders, the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 78 and 62%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Given the results of this study, this protocol deserves consideration for patients with advanced HCC. This trial was registered prospectively from December 12. 2012 to September 1. 2016.

Comparison of clinical outcome of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma according to macrovascular invasion and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization refractory status.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Sorafenib is the standard treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with distant metastasis, unresectable HCC, and HCC refractory to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI). Also, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been used for advanced HCC in Southeast and East Asian countries. However, clearer information is needed for choosing appropriately between these therapies. METHODS: The subjects were 391 HAIC and 431 sorafenibs administered at our hospital and related hospitals. In this case, cases that satisfy the following three conditions were targeted: (i) no extrahepatic metastasis, (ii) Child-Pugh A, and (ii) not having received treatment of both HAIC and sorafenib during the course. As a result, 150 cases of HAIC and 134 cases of sorafenib were analyzed this time. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for the HAIC and sorafenib groups. TACE refractory status and MVI were factors contributing to overall survival (OS). Therefore, this study divided all cases according to those variables. The median survival time of MVI-positive and non-TACE refractory cases was significantly better with HAIC (13 months) versus sorafenib (6 months). However, in MVI-negative and TACE refractory cases, the median survival time of HAIC (8 months) was significantly poorer than for sorafenib (20 months). CONCLUSION: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization refractory status with HAIC and MVI with sorafenib were factors for poor prognosis. In particular, HAIC was significantly better than sorafenib as primary treatment in MVI and non-TACE refractory cases. It is necessary to consider these factors in treatment selection.

Clinical outcomes of sorafenib treatment failure for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and candidates for regorafenib treatment in real-world practice.

AIM: As second-line therapy, regorafenib has been shown to provide a survival benefit for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who progress on sorafenib. In this retrospective study, we assessed the clinical outcomes of sorafenib treatment failure with regard to second-line chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients (n = 160) with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh A liver function and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 treated with sorafenib between June 2009 and September 2016 were enrolled. Among 147 patients with progressive disease (PD), we defined those with Child-Pugh A liver function and ECOG PS 0-1 at progression as candidates for second-line chemotherapy and those who had tolerated sorafenib (≥400 mg/day for ≥20 of the last 28 days of treatment) as candidates eligible for regorafenib treatment. RESULTS: Among all 160 patients, median overall survival was 10 months, and median progression-free survival was 3.5 months. Among the 147 patients with PD, 74 (50.3%) were candidates for second-line chemotherapy, and 45 (30.6%) were eligible for regorafenib treatment. The median post progression survival of the candidates for second-line chemotherapy (8.8 months) was statistically longer (P = 0.0002) than that of the non-candidates (3.6 months). Predictive factors for candidates were absence of macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) (odds ratio [OR], 0.39; P = 0.009) and serum albumin >3.5 g/dL (OR, 3.3; P = 0.005) at sorafenib initiation. CONCLUSION: Among patients with PD on sorafenib, approximately 30% were eligible for regorafenib treatment, whereas few patients with MVI or hypoalbuminemia at sorafenib initiation were eligible for regorafenib treatment.

Comparison of Outcome of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Radiotherapy and Sorafenib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Major Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy (HAIC + RT) versus sorafenib monotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and major portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). METHODS: This retrospective study included 108 HCC patients with PVTT of the main trunk or first branch and Child-Pugh ≤7. Sixty-eight received HAIC + RT and 40 received sorafenib. Patients were then assigned to the HAIC + RT group (n = 36) and the sorafenib group (n = 36) through case-control matching. The decision to treat with HAIC + RT or sorafenib was left to the attending physician. RESULTS: The median overall, progression-free, and postprogression survival were significantly longer in the HAIC + RT group than in the sorafenib group (9.9 vs. 5.3, p = 0.002; 3.9 vs. 2.1, p = 0.048; and 3.7 vs. 1.9 months, p = 0.02, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified HAIC + RT (hazard ratio = 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.57; p = 0.01) as a significant and independent determinant of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced HCC and major PVTT, survival was significantly longer in those treated with HAIC + RT than with sorafenib.

Efficacy and safety of edoxaban for treatment of portal vein thrombosis following danaparoid sodium in patients with liver cirrhosis.

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of edoxaban and warfarin for treatment of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) following danaparoid sodium in patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: Fifty cirrhotic patients with PVT treated initially for 2 weeks with danaparoid sodium were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Treatment was later switched to either edoxaban (n = 20) or warfarin (n = 30). We compared the efficacy and safety of edoxaban and warfarin for up to 6 months. The PVT volume was measured by dynamic computed tomography before treatment, at 2 weeks, and at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics of patients in the two groups. Treatment with edoxaban reduced the volume of PVT from 1.42 cm3 at 2 weeks to 0.42 cm3 at 6 months, and prevented exacerbation of PVT at 6 months after treatment with danaparoid sodium (P = 0.016). In contrast, treatment with warfarin resulted in increased PVT volume from 1.73 cm3 at 2 weeks to 2.85 cm3 at 6 months, despite the control of the international normalized ratio in 57% of the patients (P = 0.005). Multivariate regression analysis identified edoxaban therapy as the single significant and independent determinant of PVT reduction at 6 months (P = 0.0014, hazard ratio 6.400). Clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding was encountered in 3 of 20 (15%) patients of the edoxaban group and 2 of 30 (7%) of the warfarin group (P = 0.335). CONCLUSION: Edoxaban following danaparoid sodium is an effective anticoagulant and could be potentially considered as one of the treatment options for PVT in cirrhotic patients.

Clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in elderly patients. METHODS: From 2008 to 2015, 117 patients with HCC (≤3 nodules, ≤30 mm in diameter, Child-Pugh score ≤7, and no vascular or extracellular metastasis) were treated with SBRT at our hospital. We evaluated overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local control, and adverse events. Patients were stratified according to age 75 years and older (elderly group, n = 54) and age younger than 75 years (young group, n = 63). RESULTS: The median OS in the elderly group was not significantly different from that in the young group (52 months vs. not reached, P = 0.27). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 96.2%, 77.6%, and 63.9%, respectively, in the elderly group, and 96.8%, 84.8%, and 67.7%, respectively, in the young group. The median DFS in the elderly group was significantly shorter than that in the young group (13 vs. 25 months, respectively; P = 0.03). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year DFS rates were 50.6%, 30.4%, and 26.6%, respectively, in the elderly group and 66.5%, 50.7%, and 45.3%, respectively, in the young group. The 3-year local tumor control rate in the elderly group was 98.1%, and that in the young group was 98.4% (P = 0.83). There was no difference between groups in the incidence of any adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiotherapy can be effective and safe for the treatment of HCC in elderly patients.

Risk factors for exacerbation of gastroesophageal varices and portosystemic encephalopathy during treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs for hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis.

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for worsening of gastroesophageal varices (GEVs) and development of portosystemic encephalopathy in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis during nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) treatment. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-seven patients with HBV-related cirrhosis were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Findings of portal hemodynamics with computed tomography, liver function, and endoscopic examinations during NA treatment were assessed. RESULTS: Among 137 patients, feeding vessels for GEVs (left gastric vein, posterior gastric vein, and short gastric vein) were present in 56 (41%) patients, and extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (paraesophageal vein, paraumbilicul vein, and splenorenal shunt) were present in 36 (26%) patients at the start of NA treatment. Although NA treatment was successful, significant improvements were not observed in portosystemic collateral vessels 3 years after NA treatment and GEVs were exacerbated in 48 (35%) patients. The cumulative 5- and 10-year exacerbation rate of GEVs was 27% and 50%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, the existence of feeding vessels for GEVs at the start of NA treatment was the independent predictive factor for the exacerbation of GEVs (P < 0.001). Eight patients who had extrahepatic portosystemic shunt at the start of NA treatment developed portosystemic encephalopathy during follow-up. The 3- and 5-year incidence of that was 5% and 8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of portosystemic collateral vessels at the start of NA treatment increases the risk of GEVs worsening and development of portosystemic encephalopathy in patients with HBV-related cirrhosis, despite improvement of liver function and success in reducing viral loads with NA treatment.

The risks of hepatocellular carcinoma development after HCV eradication are similar between patients treated with peg-interferon plus ribavirin and direct-acting antiviral therapy.

The risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development is reduced following viral elimination by interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients. However, the risk in patients treated with interferon-free direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) is unknown. We evaluated chronic hepatitis C patients who achieved viral eradication by pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV, n = 244) or daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DCV/ASV, n = 154) therapy. None of the patients had prior history of HCC or antiviral therapy. The median observation period after the end of treatment for the PEG-IFN/RBV and DCV/ASV groups were 96 (range 10-196) and 23 (range 4-78) months, respectively. During the observation period, HCC developed in 13 (5.3%) and 7 (4.5%) patients in the PEG-IFN/RBV and DCV/ASV groups, respectively. The cumulative HCC development rate after 1-, 3- and 5-years (0.4%, 3% and 5% for the PEG-IFN/RBV group and 0.6%, 9% and 9% for the DAA group, respectively) were similar between the two groups. Propensity score matching analysis also showed no significant difference in HCC development rates between the two groups. Serum AFP levels decreased to similar levels between PEG-IFN/RBV and DCV/ASV groups following the achievement of viral eradication. The risk for HCC development following viral eradication by IFN-free DAA therapy may be similar to that in IFN-based therapy.

Impact of Hepatitis C Virus Eradication on the Clinical Outcome of Patients with Hepatitis C Virus-Related Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sorafenib.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication on the clinical outcome of patients with HCV-related advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib. METHODS: A total of 58 HCV-related advanced HCC patients with Child-Pugh grade A disease who were treated with sorafenib were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Of these, 27 patients were HCV RNA negative as a result of previous antiviral therapy (sustained viral response [SVR] group), while the remaining 31 were HCV RNA positive (non-SVR group). RESULTS: The response rate, disease control rate and median time to progression in the SVR group (6, 46.0%, and 3.8 months, respectively) were similar to those in the non-SVR group (3, 51.5%, and 2.7 months, respectively). On the other hand, the median time to treatment failure (TTTF), post-progression survival (PPS), and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in the SVR group than in the non-SVR group (9.7, 8.5, and 15 months vs. 5.9, 5.2, and 9.3 months; p = 0.023, 0.02, and 0.014, respectively). On multivariate analysis, SVR was identified as a significant and independent determinant of PPS (p = 0.009), TTTF (p = 0.028), and OS (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: HCV eradication before sorafenib treatment for HCV-related advanced HCC could prolong PPS and TTTF and improve OS.

The risk of transient postprandial oxyhypoglycemia in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is frequently associated with insulin resistance (IR) and abnormalities in glucose metabolism. Prevalent postprandial hyperinsulinemia along with insulin resistance in NAFLD may lead to hypoglycemia. This study investigated the prevalence of postprandial oxyhypoglycemia in patients with NAFLD. METHODS: The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with 75 g glucose was performed in 375 biopsy-proven NAFLD patients with prior unknown type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Serum glucose and insulin levels were measured for 3 h after glucose loading and the clinical parameters were compared. RESULTS: Normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and DM were observed in 36, 36, and 28 %, respectively. Hypoglycemia (≤70 mg/dL) after 3 h was observed in 14.4 % of all patients. The rate of hypoglycemia was significantly higher in NGT (63 % of NGT) than in IGT (30 % of IGT) and DM (7 % of DM) (P < 0.05). In patients with hypoglycemia, the levels of insulin were significantly higher at 30 and 60 min than those without hypoglycemia (P < 0.05). By multivariate analysis, high-LDL cholesterolemia (P < 0.05), low-HDL cholesterolemia (P < 0.05), and fibrosis (P < 0.05) were significant factors that contributed to hypoglycemia after 3 h on 75 g OGTT. CONCLUSIONS: A relatively higher proportion of NAFLD cases exhibited transient postprandial hypoglycemia after 3 h on OGTT, especially in NAFLD patients with early-stage fibrosis. By performing 75 g OGTT for 3 h, hypoglycemia would be diagnosed earlier and the treatment intervention would decrease the progression of NAFLD and deterioration of glucose metabolism.

Liver fibrosis assessment by FibroScan compared with pathological findings of liver resection specimen in hepatitis C infection.

AIM: FibroScan is a tool for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis. Previous studies have compared liver stiffness to percutaneous liver biopsy findings, but no study has compared liver stiffness to liver resection specimen findings. The aim of this study was to compare FibroScan measurements to resected liver specimen findings. METHODS: From April 2011 to November 2015, a total of 114 patients with liver tumor and hepatitis C were enrolled. We divided them into two groups, the training set and validation set. Liver stiffness was measured by FibroScan before surgery, and specimens obtained by liver resection were evaluated according to the METAVIR system. RESULTS: Using Spearman's rank correlation analysis, a positive correlation between liver stiffness measurement and liver fibrosis stage was observed (r = 0.786, P ≤ 0.0001). In the training set, the area under receiver operating curves for diagnosis of F ≥ 2 was 0.971 (95% confidence interval, 0.928-1.000; cut-off value, 5.9), for diagnosis of F ≥ 3 was 0.911 (0.825-0.997, 9.8), and for diagnosis of F = 4 was 0.917 (0.849-0.985, 15.5). In the validation set, at a cut-off value of 5.9 kPa, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values for F ≥ 2 were 95.7%, 0.0%, 97.8%, and 0.0%, respectively, of 9.8 kPa for F ≥ 3 were 86.2%, 52.6%, 73.5%, and 71.4%, and of 15.5 kPa for F = 4 were 100%, 71.8%, 45.0%, and 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The stage of stiffness graded by FibroScan has a good correlation with the liver fibrosis of resected liver specimens. It has the ability to diagnose fibrosis stage non-invasively.

Clinical outcome and prognostic factors in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with bone metastases medicated with zoledronic acid.

AIMS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcome and prognostic parameters in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and bone metastases who had received treatment with zoledronic acid (ZOL). METHODS: Ninety-nine HCC patients with bone metastases who had been treated with ZOL were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. We analyzed the prognostic factors, including serum N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) levels, as bone metabolism markers. RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) time was 11.5 months. Child-Pugh grade A (P = 0.004) and intrahepatic tumor stage (IHTS) T0-3 (P = 0.010) correlated significantly with favorable OS. In 46 patients with grade A and T0-3, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis defined 16 nmol BCE/L serum NTX as the cut-off level for median OS. Multivariate analysis identified baseline serum NTX <16 nmol BCE/L (P = 0.045) as the only significant and independent determinant of OS. CONCLUSION: Low baseline serum NTX level correlated with favorable outcome in bone metastatic HCC patients with Child-Pugh grade A and IHTS T0-3 treated with ZOL.

Comparison of Outcome of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy and Sorafenib in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Refractory to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization.

AIM: To compare the outcome of 5-fluorouracil (FU)-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with sorafenib monotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 123 patients with HCC refractory to TACE, with Child-Pugh A and free of extrahepatic metastasis, were divided into two groups: 65 received HAIC and 58 received sorafenib. Since the size of main tumor and portal vein invasion were significantly different between the HAIC and sorafenib groups, we selected 48 patients from the 65 patients of the HAIC group and 48 from the 58 patients of the sorafenib group. The model used one-to-one matching between the two groups using the case-control method matching method. The clinical characteristics of patients of the case-control HAIC (n=48) and sorafenib groups (n=48) were similar. Overall survival, time to progression and time to treatment failure (TTTF) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The median survival time and TTTF were significantly longer in the sorafenib group than in the HAIC group (15 and 12.2 months versus 8 and 4.4 months, respectively; p=0.021 and p=0.002, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified male gender (p=0.008), relative tumor size <50% (p=0.012), α-fetoprotein <400 ng/ml (p=0.005), and treatment with sorafenib (p=0.001) as significant and independent determinants of better overall survival. CONCLUSION: In patients with HCC refractory to TACE, overall survival was favorable in those treated with sorafenib rather than HAIC.

Preoperative Fluorine 18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Prediction of Microvascular Invasion in Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the value of preoperative fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-FDG PET-CT) for predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) in small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: We retrospectively examined 60 patients who received F-FDG PET-CT prior to hepatic resection for small HCC (≤30 mm) with subsequent MVI confirmation by histopathology. The associations between PET-positive status and tumor factors were assessed. Furthermore, independent predictors for MVI and diagnostic utility of each MVI predictor were assessed. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed the presence of MVI as an independent predictor of PET-positive status (P = 0.023). Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 3.2 or greater (P = 0.017) and lens culinaris agglutinin a-reactive α-fetoprotein (AFP-L3) 19% or greater (P = 0.010) were independent predictors of MVI. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for SUVmax of 3.2 or greater, AFP-L3 19% or greater, and both factors combined for predicting MVI were 0.712 (0.493-0.932), 0.755 (0.563-0.947), and 0.856 (0.721-0.991), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for predicting MVI were 77.8% and 74.5% for SUVmax of 3.2 or greater, 66.7% and 84.3% for AFP-L3 19% or greater, and 88.9% and 82.4% for the combination. CONCLUSIONS: F-FDG PET-CT and AFP-L3 may be useful for predicting MVI in small HCC, and the combination of the 2 factors provided reliable assessment for selection of suitable hepatic resection and liver transplantation candidates.

Complete response to short-term sorafenib treatment alone for hepatocellular carcinoma with bone, lymph node, and peritoneum metastases.

We report a 60-year-old male patient who developed extrahepatic metastases in bone, peritoneum, and lymph nodes (confirmed by computed tomography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography) after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. He was treated with sorafenib (800 mg/day) but developed grade 3 hand-foot syndrome. He continued to be treated with sorafenib but at a lower dose (400 mg/week). The response to sorafenib therapy was graded as complete response at 6 months by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Sorafenib was continued for 8 months and the patient remained in complete response for 11 months. Further reporting of similar cases should help design treatment strategies and evaluate predictors of the response to sorafenib therapy.

Effects of ITPA polymorphism on decrease of hemoglobin during simeprevir, peg-interferon, and ribavirin combination treatment for chronic hepatitis C.

AIM: Polymorphisms in the ITPA gene influence anemia during peg-interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy, but their effects during triple therapy with simeprevir, PEG-IFN, and RBV are not sufficiently known. METHODS: We analyzed 212 patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C, who were treated with simeprevir plus PEG-IFN/RBV triple therapy, and assessed the effect of the ITPA polymorphism on hemoglobin levels and RBV dose reduction. ITPA (rs1127354) and IFNL4 (ss469415590) polymorphisms were genotyped using the Invader assay. A stepwise multivariate regression analysis was carried out to identify factors associated with outcome of the therapy. RESULTS: Reduction of hemoglobin levels was similar between patients treated with simeprevir plus PEG-IFN/RBV and those treated with PEG-IFN/RBV therapy. In simeprevir plus PEG-IFN/RBV-treated patients, decreases in hemoglobin levels were faster and greater, and the cumulative proportion of patients with ribavirin dose reduction was significantly greater in ITPA genotype CC patients than in CA/AA patients. The total dose of simeprevir and PEG-IFN was similar between ITPA genotype CC and CA/AA patients. In contrast, the total dose of RBV was lower in patients with the CC genotype. Multivariate analysis showed that the IFNL4 TT/TT genotype, but not the ITPA SNP genotype, treatment history (treatment-naive or relapse during prior treatment), and treatment completion were significantly associated with outcome of therapy. CONCLUSION: ITPA polymorphism influences hemoglobin levels and incidence of RVB dose reduction during simeprevir triple therapy, indicating the importance of monitoring anemia during treatment, particularly for ITPA genotype CC patients.

Development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C virus infection who achieved sustained virological response following interferon therapy: A large-scale, long-term cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the risk factors for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following successful eradication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) with interferon (IFN) therapy in a long-term, large-scale cohort study. METHODS: We reviewed 1094 consecutive patients with HCV who achieved sustained virological response (SVR) following IFN therapy between January 1995 and September 2013. RESULTS: During the observation period (median 50 months: range 13-224), 36 (3%) of 1094 patients developed HCC after SVR. The median period from SVR to diagnosis of HCC was 37 months (range 17-141), and the cumulative rates of HCC at 5, 10, and 15 years were 4%, 6%, and 12%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified old age (≥60 years, HR, 3.1: 95%CI, 1.3-6.6: P = 0.009), male sex (HR, 12.0: 95%CI, 2.8-50.0: P < 0.0001), advanced fibrosis stage (F3/4, HR, 3.2: 95%CI, 1.6-7.2: P < 0.0001), and alpha-fetoprotein ≥10 ng/mL at 1 year after SVR (HR, 7.8: 95%CI, 2.9-16.8: P < 0.0001) as significant and independent risk factors for post-SVR HCC. CONCLUSIONS: Older age and male sex (host factors), advanced fibrosis stage (pre-IFN treatment factor), and higher alpha-fetoprotein values (post-treatment factor) were significantly associated with HCC development after HCV eradication.