Efficacy and safety of inhaled recombinant interleukin-2 in high-risk renal cell cancer patients compared with systemic interleukin-2: an outcome study.

Systemic IL-2 is an effective treatment for low to intermediate risk mRCC patients, its efficacy is marginal in high-risk cases. Therefore, other treatment approaches are required for this population. Ninety-four high-risk patients with RCC and pulmonary metastases were treated with inhaled plus concomitant low-dose subcutaneous rhIL-2. Clinical response, survival and safety were compared with those from IL-2 given systemically at the registered dose and schedule in 103 comparable historical controls. In the rhIL-2 INH group, treatment consisted of 6.5 MIU rhIL-2 nebulized 5x/day and 3.3 MIU rhIL-2 SC once daily. The rhIL-2 SYS group received treatment which consisted of intravenous infusion of 18.0 MIU/m2/day rhIL-2 or SC injection of 3.6-18.0 MIU rhIL-2. Some patients in both groups also received IFNalpha. Mean treatment durations were 43 weeks rhIL-2 INH and 15 weeks rhIL-2 SYS. Significantly longer overall survival and progression-free survival durations were observed in the rhIL-2 INH group. The probability of survival at 5 years was 21% for the rhIL-2 INH group. No patients survived 5 years in the rhIL-2 SYS group. A multivariate analysis of overall survival adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics between the two treatment groups resulted in a risk ratio of 0.43 (95% CI 0.30-0.63; P < 0.0001). The data suggested an association between the response (SD or better) and survival, especially in the rhIL-2 INH group. The inhalation regimen was well tolerated. This outcome study suggests that administration of rhIL-2 by inhalation is efficacious and safe in high-risk mRCC patients with pulmonary metastases, who have no other treatment option available.

Safety, immunogenicity, and induction of immunologic memory by a serogroup C meningococcal conjugate vaccine in infants: A randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Neisseria meningitidis is a common cause of meningitis and septicemia in infants worldwide. Whether a meningococcal C conjugate vaccine protects infants against the serogroup C strain is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a meningococcal C conjugate vaccine is safe and immunogenic and induces immunologic memory in infants. DESIGN: Single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial in 1995 and 1996. SETTING: Community, Oxfordshire, England. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-two healthy infants. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive vaccination with 0. 5-mL doses of 1 of 2 lots of meningococcal C conjugate vaccine (groups 1 and 2; n=60 in each group) or a hepatitis B control vaccine (group 3; n=62), administered with routine immunizations at 2, 3, and 4 months of age. Approximately half of each group received meningococcal C conjugate vaccine and half received plain meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine (MPS) at 12 months of age. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum antibodies to meningococcal C polysaccharide, assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and serum bactericidal activity (SBA), at 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, and 13 months of age; local and systemic reactions, recorded for 6 days after each vaccination, compared by intervention group. RESULTS: Meningococcal C conjugate vaccine was well tolerated. After 3 doses, children in groups 1 and 2 achieved significantly higher meningococcal C IgG geometric mean concentrations (21 and 17 U/mL, respectively, vs 0.20 U/mL; P<.001) and SBA titers (629 and 420, respectively, vs 4.1; P<. 001) than controls. At 12 months, antibody concentrations had decreased in all groups but remained significantly higher in children vaccinated with meningococcal C conjugate vaccine (SBA, 24 and 16 in groups 1 and 2, respectively, vs 4.2 in group 3; P<.001). Following vaccination with MPS at 12 months of age, SBA in the meningococcal C conjugate vaccine group was significantly higher than in controls (SBA, 789 vs 4.5; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that meningococcal C conjugate vaccine is safe and immunogenic and results in immunologic memory when given with other routinely administered vaccines to infants at 2, 3, and 4 months of age. JAMA. 2000;283:2795-2801

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a group C meningococcal conjugate vaccine compared with a group A+C meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine in adolescents in a randomised observer-blind controlled trial.

This study evaluated the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a group C meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenC) compared with a group A+C meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine (MenPS) in healthy adolescents. Subjects were randomised to receive one dose of either MenC (n=92) or MenPS (n=90). Group C meningococcal IgG antibody concentrations and bactericidal titres were higher in the MenC group than the MenPS group at 1 month (22.8 U/ml vs 4.0 U/ml, p<0.001, and 87 vs 20, p<0.001, respectively) and 12 months (6.1 U/ml vs 3.0 U/ml, p<0.001, and 81.3 vs 20.2, p<0.001, respectively). No differences in post immunisation reaction rates were noted between the two vaccinated groups. This study demonstrated the safety and enhanced immunogenicity of the candidate meningococcal conjugate vaccine as compared with the licensed polysaccharide vaccine in adolescents.