Long-Term Resistance Trained Human Muscles Have More Fibres, More Myofibrils and Tighter Myofilament Packing than Untrained.

INTRODUCTION: Increases in skeletal muscle size occur in response to prolonged exposure to resistance training that is typically ascribed to increased muscle fibre size. Whether muscle fibre number also changes remains controversial, and a paucity of data exists about myofibrillar structure. This cross-sectional study compared muscle fibre and myofibril characteristics in long-term resistance-trained (LRT) versus untrained (UNT) individuals. METHODS: The maximal anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSAmax) of the biceps brachii muscle was measured by MRI in 16 LRT (5.9 ± 3.5 years' experience) and 13 UNT males. A muscle biopsy was taken from the biceps brachii to measure muscle fibre area, myofibril area and myosin spacing. Muscle fibre number, myofibril number in total and per fibre were estimated by dividing ACSAmax by muscle fibre area or myofibril area, and muscle fibre area by myofibril area, respectively. RESULTS: Compared to UNT, LRT individuals had greater ACSAmax (+70%, P < 0.001), fibre area (+29%, P = 0.028), fibre number (+34%, P = 0.013), and myofibril number per fibre (+49%, P = 0.034) and in total (+105%, P < 0.001). LRT individuals also had smaller myosin spacing (-7%, P = 0.004; i.e. greater packing density) and a tendency towards smaller myofibril area (-16%, P = 0.074). ACSAmax was positively correlated with fibre area ( r = 0.526), fibre number ( r = 0.445) and myofibril number (in total r = 0.873 and per fibre r = 0.566), and negatively correlated with myofibril area ( r = -0.456) and myosin spacing ( r = -0.382) (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The larger muscles of LRT individuals exhibited more fibres in cross-section and larger muscle fibres, which contained substantially more total myofibrils and more packed myofilaments than UNT participants, suggesting plasticity of muscle ultrastructure.

Sex differences in muscle morphology between male and female sprinters.

There is a marked difference between males and females in sprint running performance, yet a comprehensive investigation of sex differences in the muscle morphology of sprinters, which could explain the performance differences, remains to be completed. This study compared muscle volumes of 23 individual leg muscles and 5 functional muscle groups, assessed with 3 T magnetic resonance imaging, between male (n = 31) and female (n = 22) sprinters, as well as subgroups of elite males (EM, n = 5), elite females (EF, n = 5), and performance-matched (to elite females) males (PMMEF, n = 6). Differences in muscle volume distribution between EM, EF, and unathletic male (UM) controls were also assessed. For the full cohorts, male sprinters were more muscular than their female counterparts, but the differences were nonuniform and anatomically variable, with the largest differences in the hip extensors and flexors. However, among elite sprinters the sex differences in the volume of the functional muscle groups were almost uniform (absolute volume +47-53%), and the muscle volume distribution of EM was more similar to EF than to UM (P < 0.039). For PMMEF, relative hip extensor volume, but not stature or percent body fat, differentiated for performance (PMMEF and EF < EM) rather than sex. In conclusion, although the full cohorts of sprinters showed a marked sex difference in the amount and distribution of muscle mass, elite sprinters appeared to be selected for a common muscle distribution phenotype that for these elite subgroups was a stronger effect than that of sex. Relative hip extensor muscle volume, rather than stature, percent body fat, or total relative muscle volume, appeared to be the primary determinant of the sex difference in performance.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We present novel evidence suggesting muscle volume, specifically relative hip extensor volume, may be a primary deterministic variable for the sex difference in sprint performance, such that with matched sprint times, male and female sprinters may be expected to have equivalent muscle morphology. We highlight striking similarities in distribution of leg muscle mass between elite male and female sprinters and provide evidence for the existence of a muscular distribution phenotype specific to elite sprinters, irrespective of sex.

The Muscle Morphology of Elite Female Sprint Running.

INTRODUCTION: A paucity of research exists examining the importance of muscle morphological and functional characteristics for elite female sprint performance. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare lower body muscle volumes and vertical jumping power between elite and subelite female sprinters and assess the relationships of these characteristics with sprint race and acceleration performance. METHODS: Five elite (100 m seasons best [SBE 100 ], 11.16 ± 0.06 s) and 17 subelite (SBE 100 , 11.84 ± 0.42 s) female sprinters underwent: 3T magnetic resonance imaging to determine the volume of 23 individual leg muscles/compartments and five functional muscle groups; countermovement jump and 30 m acceleration tests. RESULTS: Total absolute lower body muscle volume was higher in elite versus subelite sprinters (+15%). Elite females exhibited greater muscle volume of the hip flexors (absolute, +28%; relative [to body mass], +19%), hip extensors (absolute, +22%; relative, +14%), and knee extensors (absolute, +21%), demonstrating pronounced anatomically specific muscularity, with relative hip flexor volume alone explaining 48% of sprint performance variability. The relative volume of five individual muscles (sartorius, gluteus maximus, adductor magnus, vastus lateralis, illiopsoas) were both distinct between groups (elite > subelite) and related to SBE 100 ( r = 0.553-0.639), with the combination of the sartorius (41%) and the adductor magnus (17%) explaining 58% of the variance in SBE 100 . Elite female sprinters demonstrated greater absolute countermovement jump power versus subelite, and absolute and relative power were related to both SBE 100 ( r = -0.520 to -0.741) and acceleration performance ( r = 0.569 to 0.808). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation illustrates the distinctive, anatomically specific muscle volume distribution that facilitates elite sprint running in females, and emphasizes the importance of hip flexor and extensor relative muscle volume.