Naloxone-resistant respiratory depression and neurological eye symptoms after intrathecal morphine.

We describe a case of neurological symptoms after the intrathecal use of an opioid. These symptoms were not reversible by the use of an opioid-antagonist.

Headache as the initial manifestation of acute aortic dissection type A.

The most common initial symptom of aortic dissection is chest pain. Other initial symptoms include pain in the neck, throat, abdomen and lower back, syncope, paresis, and dyspnoea. Headache as the initial symptom of aortic dissection has not been described previously. A 61-year-old woman with a history of migraine and arterial hypertension developed continuous bifrontal headache. Two hours later, right-sided thoracic pain and a diastolic murmur were suggestive of aortic dissection that was confirmed by echocardiography and subsequent surgery. The dissection commenced in the ascending aorta and involved all cervical arteries until the base of the skull. Headache as the initial manifestation of aortic dissection was assumed due to either vessel distension or pericarotid plexus ischemia. Aortic dissection has to be considered as a rare differential diagnosis of frontal headache, especially in patients who develop aortic regurgitation or chest pain for the first time.

[The value of thoracic and abdominal computed tomography with intensive care patients]. / Wertigkeit der thorakalen und abdominellen Computertomographie bei Intensivpatienten.

We evaluated in a retrospective study the therapeutic relevance of thoracic and abdominal CT examinations on 157 intensive-care patients with previously inconclusive radiological examinations. Indications for CT were sepsis (n = 105), rarely a decrease in haematocrit (n = 30), multiorgan failure (n = 16) or suspected aortic aneurysm (n = 6). In 83.4% of examinations CT detected clinically relevant features, in 44.3% positive CT studies resulted in invasive therapy within 72 hours and therefore changed patient management decisively. Our results justify the use of CT, enabling if necessary an on-target intervention, the advantages outweighing the inherent risks if the patient is exposed to the relatively small risk of being temporarily removed from the intensive-care unit for immediate invasive treatment.

[Tramadol in postoperative pain therapy. Patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous infusion]. / Tramadol zur postoperativen Schmerztherapie. Patientenkontrollierte Analgesie versus kontinuierliche Infusion.

UNLABELLED: Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is a well-proven procedure for individual pain relief in the post-operative period. Despite its superior approach regarding pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations, PCA equipment is not available to many in the clinical practice. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of PCA with continuous infusion (CI), an easily feasible method, using tramadol (T) as a centrally acting opioid with minor side effects on circulation and ventilation. METHODS: The study was conducted on 20 ASA I or II patients aged 20-60 years undergoing gynecological operations under standardized general anesthesia. They were randomly allocated to two groups receiving i.v. T for postoperative pain relief via Lifecare PCA 4200 Infuser. Group 1 (G1, PCA, n = 10): loading dose 3 mg/kg T, demand dose 30 mg T, lock-out time 5 min, concurrent infusion 5 mg/h T; group 2 (G2, CI, n = 10): loading dose 3 mg/kg T, continuous infusion 0.35 mg/kg per h T. If the analgesia was inadequate, additional doses of 50 mg T were available in G2. During a mean trial period of 20 h, the heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate and blood gas analysis were documented. The plasma levels of T and beta-endorphins were determined. The quality of analgesia was assessed by using a verbal and a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: The mean applied doses of T were 339 +/- 100 mg and 364 +/- 46 mg (G1 and G2, respectively) after 6 h and 565 +/- 243 mg and 707 +/- 139 mg (G1 and G2, respectively) in total (NS). Interindividual differences were substantial in G1. Five patients in G2 required an additional dose of 50 mg T. Pain scores decreased rapidly in both groups. The pain relief achieved was comparable and excellent after 6 h. The next morning, G2 reported significantly better analgesia in accordance with the higher availability of T as CI during the sleeping period. Mean plasma T levels were 994 +/- 440 ng/ml and 1170 +/- 357 ng/ml (G1 and G2, respectively). No correlation was found between T-levels and pain scores. The plasma levels of beta-endorphins were substantially elevated after the operation. They returned to normal during T-administration in both groups. No correlation was found between plasma levels of beta-endorphins and pain scores or T-consumption. Hemodynamic changes were minor and without clinical significance. PaO2 and paCO2 remained within small deviations from the physiological range. The respiratory rate, which was initially increased, dropped slightly in both groups. A high incidence of nausea and vomiting was observed, starting in the early phase of the loading dose. CONCLUSIONS: T is well suitable for postoperative pain relief after major gynecological surgery using both PCA and CI. PCA ensures adjustment of the medication to the individual demand, whereas CI provides better analgesia after sleeping periods. We recommend antiemetic prophylaxis before treatment with T.