RESUMO
Hyper-resistance after a central nervous system injury has been largely referred to as spasticity, which is but one of its neural components. Assessment largely relies on clinical scales (Modified Ashworth scale - MAS and Modified Tardieu scale, MTS) which are unable to distinguish between the non-neural (tissue-related) and the neural (central nervous system-related) components. This study assessed criterion validity and reliability (reproducibility) of muscle stiffness measures, namely, maximum elastic stiffness (ELmax), viscous stiffness (VI), and path length (L-path) in the hand flexor muscles among people with stroke. Measurements were obtained with a wrist-electromechanical oscillatory device (w-EOD). Twenty-four people with arm impairment after stroke were evaluated with the w-EOD and clinical assessment (MAS and MTS), twice on the same day (short-term reliability) and once 10 days later (long-term reliability). For criterion validity, a Spearman coefficient ( r ) was calculated between stiffness values and the clinical scales. For reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), SEM, and MDC95 were calculated. Moderate correlations were observed between EL max and MAS ( r = 0.49) and MTS (V2, r = 0.43; V3, r = 0.49) of the wrist flexors, and finger flexors (MAS, r = 0.60; MTS V2, r = 0.56; MTS V3, r = 0.55). There was a poor correlation between the clinical scales and VI and L-path. Reliability was excellent for all stiffness measurements at short term (EL max : 0.95, VI: 0.94, L-path: 0.92) and good at long term (EL max : 0.87, VI: 0.76, L-path: 0.82). In conclusion, stiffness measurements are valid and reliable to evaluate hyper-resistance in people with stroke.
