Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 52(4): 561-566, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28067870

RESUMO

In an otherwise eligible patient with relapsed lymphoma, inadequate mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is a limiting factor to proceeding with an autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). Multiple strategies have been used to mobilize an adequate number of HSCs with no obvious front-line strategy. We report a single institutional experience mobilizing HSCs using four different approaches in lymphoma patients. We prospectively collected mobilization outcomes on patients planned to undergo auto-HCT at Ohio State University. We report results of first mobilization attempts for all relapsed or refractory lymphoma patients between 2008 and 2014. We identified 255 lymphoma patients who underwent mobilization for planned auto-HCT. The 255 lymphoma patients underwent the following front line mobilization strategies: 95 (37%) G-CSF alone, 38 (15%) chemomobilization (G-CSF+chemotherapy), 97 (38%) preemptive day 4 plerixafor, and 25 (10%) rescue day 5 plerixafor. As expected, there were significant differences between cohorts including age, comorbidity indices, histology, and amount of prior chemotherapy. After controlling for differences between groups, the odds of collecting 2 × 106/kg HSCs on the first day of collection and 5 × 106/kg HSCs in total was the highest in the cohort undergoing chemomobilization. In conclusion, our experience highlights the effectiveness of chemomobilization.


Assuntos
Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Linfoma/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Antígenos CD34/análise , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Benzilaminas , Contagem de Células , Ciclamos , Feminino , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/administração & dosagem , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/normas , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/citologia , Compostos Heterocíclicos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Linfoma/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Transplante Autólogo , Adulto Jovem
2.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 49(8): 1052-5, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24797182

RESUMO

In an otherwise eligible patient, inadequate mobilization of PBSCs is a limiting factor to proceeding with an auto-ASCT. In such situations, plerixafor is commonly added to improve PBSC collection yields along with cytokine (G-CSF alone) or chemomobilization (chemotherapy+G-CSF). Individually, both strategies are proven to be safe and effective. Here we report six patients who underwent successful mobilization with combination chemomobilization plus plerixafor after upfront failure of cytokine mobilization plus plerixafor. The median CD34(+) cell yield after chemomobilization was 2.48 × 10(6)/kg (range 0.99-8.49) after receiving one to two doses of plerixafor. All patients subsequently underwent ASCT without major unforeseen toxicities and engrafted successfully. No significant delays in time to neutrophil recovery were observed. Our experience highlights the safety and effectiveness of chemomobilization with plerixafor after G-CSF plus plerixafor (G+P) failure and suggests this is a viable salvage strategy after initial failed G+P mobilization.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Compostos Heterocíclicos/administração & dosagem , Linfoma/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico , Adulto , Idoso , Autoenxertos , Benzilaminas , Ciclamos , Feminino , Humanos , Linfoma/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...